I would invite people to visit
https://masternodes.online/ and review other coins as well. You can see many starting ROI are around the 2700% ROI that we have calculated to be practical at 100 masternodes online.
Very well, it is settled that there are many projects has high percentage of returns too, just like yours, I don't think I want to bother poking around them as I am currently busy with seeing how far and serious your project is. I think we need to get back to the main concern here, that you still need to prove your legitimacy. The promised return of investment was merely a trigger that causes questions upon your credibility. The main concern here that I tried to erect as well as solve is how you refuse to inform us your team member, or anyone with clear reputation that can vouch you by stating you're legal, (and by that, also willing to be hold responsible in case of the entire team leave with raised funds). Essentially, this responsibility fell to the team member, which usually can be tracked how real they are in person from their history on LindkedIn and other social medias. But as you refuse to disclose the info, I ultimately offered you to prove your legitimacy to the public by other means, namely asking any of the entities that you've helped in the past to give some testimony. Entities with projects or clear and solid background, not newbies that's credibility is questionable. And so far, you're still not providing it. I, as well as other members of the community here that perhaps also following this issue, am still waiting.
Now, as you pointed out the site, I'd like to point out to public here too what the site suggest on the bottom of their own site,
ROI changes often and is not the most important factor. Please consider Dev Team - Community - PURPOSE/Platform - Liquidity - Wallet when making masternode purchases.
As I highlighted, the site themselves stressed on how important it is to know the team's background.
Hey Miiike,
This team really is legit, I've been following Crypto-Mick for months watching him learn the crypto world through several other coins being their marketer. My first experience of Mick was in Linda and I've continued to see him across many other communities.
I joined this project mainly in that I know that he is the real deal! He has no intentions on scamming anyone and has even gone out and said he will be committing 100% of his time to this project and crypto starting in 2019 if not sooner. What else do you want from a leader? He truly is committed to making this coin successful and he has only made a positive impression on the crypto community for several months in a row. Which over these months he's easily learned the do's and don'ts of what to do in the crypto space.
Lets just compare this to a political position. Would you want a guy/woman going into office who hasn't had any experience as a lower role in politics? That's how politicians come to be and become a trusted person. I honestly think that's exactly what Crypto-Mick has done and he has found people he's trusted over this time to be apart of this coin.
The concept of the coin is brilliant and we shall see what other avenues he decides to take this coin, but definitely the eye appeal is there for it.
There's my thoughts on it and I truly support the project! If you haven't seen my name before, I am a critical part of several teams across the crypto space on discord. Currently have a team role in GMCN, GIVES, Altcoin Global, and also this project. Just a little background on me if you are questioning my statements here.
mbush
I'm sorry, first of all, I'm not really fluent in names of crypto, there are thousands currently exist and hundreds coming everyday. So what (or is it who?) is Linda? And I assume Crypto-Mick here is...the alias of the dev?
I'm not sure what you tried to say on your paragraph about political position, care to explain more?
And about background, sure, do you mind giving me any name for me to do the check? Linkedin, perhaps?