Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 23 results by MekMekPL
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.2 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 09/03/2018, 09:15:56 UTC
Hello

I have problem, with restart after timer and creating DAG.
I get occassionally problems with DAG creation when miner restart after timer... never problem when startup manually.

I PUT -GSER 4 to delay every card but that does not help.. do you think PSU is the issue ?

04:46:36:967   18cc   parse packet: 242
04:46:36:967   18cc   ETH: job is the same
04:46:36:967   18cc   new buf size: 0
04:46:39:186   14c8   GPU1 DAG creation time - 6667 ms
04:46:39:186   14c8   Setting DAG epoch #174 for GPU1 done
04:46:39:186   c4   Setting DAG epoch #174 for GPU2
04:46:39:186   c4   Create GPU buffer for GPU2
04:46:39:592   c4   GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_kd failed 4 (0), unspecified launch failure
04:46:39:592   c4   GPU 2, Calc DAG failed!
04:46:39:623   1ac8   GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
04:46:39:623   1f24   GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
04:46:39:623   103c   GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
04:46:39:623   1ac8   GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
04:46:39:623   1f24   GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
04:46:39:623   103c   GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
04:46:39:623   1ac8   Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
04:46:39:623   1ac8   GPU 1 failed
04:46:39:623   14c8   GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
04:46:39:623   1f24   Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
04:46:39:623   1f24   GPU 0 failed
04:46:39:623   56c   GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
04:46:39:623   103c   Set global fail flag, failed GPU4
04:46:39:623   103c   GPU 4 failed
04:46:39:623   116c   GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
04:46:39:623   14c8   GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
04:46:39:623   56c   GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
04:46:39:623   116c   GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
04:46:39:623   14c8   Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
04:46:39:639   14c8   GPU 1 failed
04:46:39:623   56c   Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
04:46:39:623   116c   Set global fail flag, failed GPU4
04:46:39:639   116c   GPU 4 failed
04:46:39:639   56c   GPU 0 failed
04:46:40:107   176c   Setting DAG epoch #174 for GPU3
04:46:40:107   176c   Create GPU buffer for GPU3
04:46:40:107   176c   CUDA error - cannot allocate big buffer for DAG. Check readme.txt for possible solutions.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.2 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 07/03/2018, 12:22:04 UTC
Hello

i got problems with few miners.... they occasionally get this problem. Before v11 the rigs were stable and never had problems. Any ideas? :

13:09:30:629   1638   ETH: 03/07/18-13:09:30 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
13:09:30:629   1638   target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 173(2.35GB)
13:09:30:629   1638   ETH - Total Speed: 188.924 Mh/s, Total Shares: 18, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:12
13:09:30:629   1638   ETH: GPU0 31.803 Mh/s, GPU1 31.572 Mh/s, GPU2 31.756 Mh/s, GPU3 31.795 Mh/s, GPU4 31.770 Mh/s, GPU5 30.229 Mh/s
13:09:36:895   1638   got 243 bytes
13:09:36:895   1638   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x9535d44aa03ed3044af9ec36125bd117575459f1f19323e8af46520446b9f05e","0x4e2977c9152afafb8ea63ea5434ada0692b481b8ad37d05391c3a7738d63eb5d","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}

13:09:36:895   1638   parse packet: 242
13:09:36:895   1638   ETH: job changed
13:09:36:895   1638   new buf size: 0
13:09:36:895   1638   ETH: 03/07/18-13:09:36 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
13:09:36:895   1638   target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 173(2.35GB)
13:09:36:895   1638   ETH - Total Speed: 190.483 Mh/s, Total Shares: 18, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:12
13:09:36:895   1638   ETH: GPU0 31.789 Mh/s, GPU1 31.716 Mh/s, GPU2 31.765 Mh/s, GPU3 31.730 Mh/s, GPU4 31.732 Mh/s, GPU5 31.751 Mh/s
13:09:39:614   1638   send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x8fa29ef", "0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000c2d74293"]}

13:09:39:692   18d8   GPU0 t=43C fan=49%, GPU1 t=45C fan=50%, GPU2 t=47C fan=56%, GPU3 t=47C fan=56%, GPU4 t=51C fan=64%, GPU5 t=40C fan=48%
13:09:40:333   1638   ETH: checking pool connection...
13:09:40:333   1638   send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}

13:09:40:380   1638   got 243 bytes
13:09:40:380   1638   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x9535d44aa03ed3044af9ec36125bd117575459f1f19323e8af46520446b9f05e","0x4e2977c9152afafb8ea63ea5434ada0692b481b8ad37d05391c3a7738d63eb5d","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}

13:09:40:380   1638   parse packet: 242
13:09:40:380   1638   ETH: job is the same
13:09:40:380   1638   new buf size: 0
13:09:40:536   378   em hbt: 16, fm hbt: 94,
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 0 (gpu0), hb time 47
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 1 (gpu0), hb time 172
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 2 (gpu1), hb time 47
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 3 (gpu1), hb time 172
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 4 (gpu2), hb time 78
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 5 (gpu2), hb time 203
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 6 (gpu3), hb time 78
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 7 (gpu3), hb time 203
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 8 (gpu4), hb time 94
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 9 (gpu4), hb time 219
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 10 (gpu5), hb time 203
13:09:40:536   378   watchdog - thread 11 (gpu5), hb time 78
13:09:50:349   1638   ETH: checking pool connection...
13:09:50:349   1638   send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}

13:09:50:396   1638   got 243 bytes
13:09:50:396   1638   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x9535d44aa03ed3044af9ec36125bd117575459f1f19323e8af46520446b9f05e","0x4e2977c9152afafb8ea63ea5434ada0692b481b8ad37d05391c3a7738d63eb5d","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}

13:09:50:396   1638   parse packet: 242
13:09:50:396   1638   ETH: job is the same
13:09:50:396   1638   new buf size: 0
13:09:50:661   10b0   GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:661   10b0   GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:661   10b0   Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
13:09:50:661   10b0   GPU 0 failed
13:09:50:661   18bc   GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:661   18bc   GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:661   18bc   Set global fail flag, failed GPU0
13:09:50:661   18bc   GPU 0 failed
13:09:50:677   a64   GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:677   a64   GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:677   a64   Set global fail flag, failed GPU4
13:09:50:677   a64   GPU 4 failed
13:09:50:677   20   GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:677   20   GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:677   20   Set global fail flag, failed GPU4
13:09:50:677   20   GPU 4 failed
13:09:50:708   eb8   GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:708   eb8   GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:708   eb8   Set global fail flag, failed GPU5
13:09:50:708   eb8   GPU 5 failed
13:09:50:708   648   GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:708   648   GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:708   648   Set global fail flag, failed GPU3
13:09:50:708   648   GPU 3 failed
13:09:50:708   1008   GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:708   1008   GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:708   1008   Set global fail flag, failed GPU5
13:09:50:724   1008   GPU 5 failed
13:09:50:724   1864   GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:724   1864   GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:724   1864   Set global fail flag, failed GPU2
13:09:50:724   1864   GPU 2 failed
13:09:50:724   2b8   GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:724   2b8   GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:724   2b8   Set global fail flag, failed GPU3
13:09:50:724   2b8   GPU 3 failed
13:09:50:724   11c4   GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:724   11c4   GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:724   11c4   Set global fail flag, failed GPU2
13:09:50:724   11c4   GPU 2 failed
13:09:50:771   b54   GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:771   b54   GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:771   b54   Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
13:09:50:771   b54   GPU 1 failed
13:09:50:771   a5c   GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
13:09:50:771   a5c   GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
13:09:50:771   a5c   Set global fail flag, failed GPU1
13:09:50:771   a5c   GPU 1 failed
13:09:59:599   1638   got 243 bytes
13:09:59:599   1638   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xe9e46efc3420221902c1014737fab8f50d03aada3ab84095d8e013cb07d960e8","0x4e2977c9152afafb8ea63ea5434ada0692b481b8ad37d05391c3a7738d63eb5d","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}

13:09:59:599   1638   parse packet: 242
13:09:59:599   1638   ETH: job changed
13:09:59:599   1638   new buf size: 0
13:09:59:599   1638   ETH: 03/07/18-13:09:59 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
13:09:59:599   1638   target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 173(2.35GB)
13:09:59:599   1638   ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 18, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:13
13:09:59:599   1638   ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s, GPU4 0.000 Mh/s, GPU5 0.000 Mh/s
13:09:59:631   1638   send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x0", "0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000c2d74293"]}

13:10:00:365   1638   ETH: checking pool connection...
13:10:00:365   1638   send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}

13:10:00:412   1638   got 243 bytes
13:10:00:412   1638   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xe9e46efc3420221902c1014737fab8f50d03aada3ab84095d8e013cb07d960e8","0x4e2977c9152afafb8ea63ea5434ada0692b481b8ad37d05391c3a7738d63eb5d","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}

13:10:00:412   1638   parse packet: 242
13:10:00:412   1638   ETH: job is the same
13:10:00:412   1638   new buf size: 0
13:10:03:740   1638   got 243 bytes
13:10:03:740   1638   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x215e3b5366dc0ad70a3c94e90f89aef730f523866a9b70cc5b584d22eb40563c","0x4e2977c9152afafb8ea63ea5434ada0692b481b8ad37d05391c3a7738d63eb5d","0x000000006df37f675ef6eadf5ab9a2072d44268d97df837e6748956e5c6c2116"]}

13:10:03:740   1638   parse packet: 242
13:10:03:740   1638   ETH: job changed
13:10:03:740   1638   new buf size: 0
13:10:03:740   1638   ETH: 03/07/18-13:10:03 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
13:10:03:740   1638   target: 0x000000006df37f67 (diff: 10000MH), epoch 173(2.35GB)
13:10:03:740   1638   ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 18, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:13
13:10:03:740   1638   ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s, GPU4 0.000 Mh/s, GPU5 0.000 Mh/s
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: BLAKE 2s Mining related topics
by
MekMekPL
on 25/02/2018, 17:37:07 UTC
guys forget about blake2s and XVG.

Switch to keccak with SMARTcash.
Online wallet, 100% working 0% fee official pool

only problem with exchange - need to make account www.coinexchange.io and change to BTC (eventually to ETC later for withdrawal)

Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 21/02/2018, 20:23:47 UTC

you cannot mine CREA it's keccak-c. dont bother keccak there is no PROFITABLE coin.

i mined MAX here: max.thecoin.pw. WTM said 0 profits.


Actually SMART is Keccak and SMART is more profitable than XVG - at least for RX480.
Also SMART pools are much more stable as there are official ones.

where to mine SMART and where to sell?

Whattomine shows no exchanges?

is there online wallet ?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 21/02/2018, 13:37:13 UTC
Has anyone found a way to mine keccak? Whatever coin I try to mine, on whatever pool, i get 100% rejected shares on keccak.
Why is that?

Same question with no answer. All night I was tried and no success.
Last houpe was Smart Cash, but last night they went down with pool, and it seems that its some shady project. Lots of people complaining.

How I figure out, Keccak and Blake is a fork from Sha256. All coins are old from 2013-14,... and pools are too long closed.

Maybe we need Algo to mine ERC ICO tokens Huh

you cannot mine CREA it's keccak-c. dont bother keccak there is no PROFITABLE coin.

i mined MAX here: max.thecoin.pw. WTM said 0 profits.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: BLAKE 2s Mining related topics
by
MekMekPL
on 20/02/2018, 21:29:25 UTC
i just tried MAX coin on max on pool: max.thecoin.pw

but the hashrate is 1215 MH/s on 6xrx580, and WTM shows me only 1.1 USD extra on 6xRX580 this makes no sense.


VERGE was 4 USD... not is 2.5 USD still makes sense to do it but below 2 usd is useless.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: BLAKE 2s Mining related topics
by
MekMekPL
on 20/02/2018, 21:07:16 UTC
nlpool works ok now.. i got work etc. unfortunately massive orphans makes us work for nothing... hoprefully a good block now.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: BLAKE 2s Mining related topics
by
MekMekPL
on 20/02/2018, 20:40:50 UTC
yes but we need something to dualming with ETH

So not so much algos.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: BLAKE 2s Mining related topics
by
MekMekPL
on 20/02/2018, 20:28:47 UTC
total net hash has grown SO MUCH that a block comes up every 1-2 hours so need to be patient.

P.S last 2 blocks were ORPHANS unfortunately Sad verge network is just too big for all the NODEs to handle.

anyone got info on keccak coins ?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: BLAKE 2s Mining related topics
by
MekMekPL
on 20/02/2018, 19:49:17 UTC
NLPOOL was stable... for 2 days. Everything was GREAT. 1st day i got AS MUCH XVG as unimining 2.5 DAYS!

Now nlpool has been probable DDOSed by other pools that steal... or it just grow so much that cannot handle.. but that's not sure.

Cause the pool was ok for some time with 13 TH/s. Now it's 9-10 and there is problems so i guess attacks from others.

NO OTHER POOL IS OK (maybe antmine now.. was overloaded but i dont know about payments).


DONT USE OXO! 100% STEAL of hashpower.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 19/02/2018, 11:40:28 UTC
i think we need a new topic for NLPOOL - XVG pool.

This is gettting to much info here that is not realted directly with Claymore's miner.

The pool works now, it was down for 10 or so minutes - probably service.

The pool has grown quite a bit and i think admin need to reconfigure - add some power...

EVEN with 20% downtime is much better to mine with it than unimining that takes 50% ;-)
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 18/02/2018, 17:05:38 UTC
NLPOOL - this is LEGIT and NICE!

Please tell me why ORPHAN blocks came up? what might be the reason?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 17/02/2018, 19:15:24 UTC
ahaspool is not good - cause you can just set the algo - blake2s.

But the ahash send you diffrent coin work - not only XVG, sometimes TAJ, soetimes neva... but this coin is worthless. They should send the work that is most profitable but when they switch to those coins my BTC earn indicator went flat.. instead of rise.

That's the problem, i not accusse of steal.

I used to mine with algo switching on ahashpool was ok, but no when zec / eth i back in game makes no sense (and the stability wasnt so good, with 300+ gpu's i need stability)
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 17/02/2018, 18:41:46 UTC
Hey guyS!

it's 24h since i switched to nlpool.nl for blake2s.

THIS IS much better than ahash, and DEFINATELY than unimining!

i got 470 XVG from 30 amd RX GPUs (40-42 GH)! The pool is big now almost 9 TH!


On unimining i got 360 IN 2.5 DAYS!!!!!!! THAT JUST PLAIN THEFT!

HAIL to nlpool ;-)

Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 16/02/2018, 15:14:33 UTC

Please read:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.msg30398663#msg30398663

Again, i am very sorry that some blocks were lost, however this is solved now. I would appreciate it if we could make it up to you ;-)

Also, i would like to say that looking at the miners dashboard is see people mining XVG with the wrong password settings.

-p c=XVG-blake2s  <<< This is incorrect
-p c=XVG,ID=004_RX580_4   << Incorrect
-p x   << Incorrect.

The correct password for verge is c=XVG  nothing more, nothing less ;-)


oooh that sucks... i changed all to just c=XVG. I need to have my miners on diffrent position - cause i need to see if they all mine the same etc.
I used ID= from ahash and on unimining and it worked... i also get all sucess shares from your pool...

do not know much about pool admin but should work imho

anyway switched and we will see.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 16/02/2018, 14:15:25 UTC
YES - Mine with NLPOOL
KOREPOOL - switch all to NLPOOL.
too much of small pools.

We need 2-5 TH, and then we have 1-2 blocks per hour, which is quite ok.

I just put 40 GH on nlpool. Works fine, i could suggest to start with higher diff - at least 10 or so.
Cause in the beggining there was a flood of shares ;-)

now the diff adjusted and is beetween 35 and 56.

What we need now is more hashpower so we can catch some blocks.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 16/02/2018, 13:33:58 UTC
with dual mine on XVG and XSH the hashrate is not very stable with dcri 44-45. any one has reach a decent drci so the ETH is stale like with DCR.
Thanks

Please inform on your equipment. There is a 200-250W extra power drain using DUAL with XVG, so either you are too low on POWER settings, or your PSU cannot provide.

I have seen that with RX470 i put -5 power instead of -10 power and got extra hash on eth and XVG also with higher DCRI.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 16/02/2018, 13:12:02 UTC
unimining was 55-60% of what should be.. i switched to anttmine, looks better but after an hour or so i got serverfull messages and cannot get WORK Sad

i got around 28-30 XVG in 2 hour... so it's CLOSE to what to mine says on 44000 MH/s, == 330 XVG per day. ( 12 x 28 = 336) Grin Grin Grin

probably i switch to nlpool but the blocks are coming so rare it will be hard to benchmark within 2-3 days.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 16/02/2018, 10:35:00 UTC
⭐ Merited by EthereumPY (1)
Hi there

i mined 2,5 days on unimining (with new address) 5 rigs of 6 RX cards (5x RX580 and 1xrx470), hashrate on claymore around 41000. The pool always says less but that just not accurate.
I assumed let it be 35000, with What to mine and highest ever difficulty from today (but 3 days average is much lower) it said should be 200 XVG per day.

I mined barely 150/day and put 35000 only in the calculator. So honestly i should get 230 at least with 30 GPU's.

http://i63.tinypic.com/2vahyzn.png

i switched to antmine now and will get back with info.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v10.6 (Windows/Linux)
by
MekMekPL
on 03/02/2018, 12:32:54 UTC
Hello

i recently switched all my GTX 1070/1070ti to ETH due to ZEC price drops etc.
I find some rigs work ok (stable) and on some the hashrate is fluctuating.

may this be realted to drivers? are there drivers ok ?

385.41 for 6x1070 rigs

and 388.59 fo 6x1070ti rigs? or claymore requires the newest nvidia drivers?

i use v10.5 version.... the HASHRATE is ok at the start, but then after some time fluctuates. I check on nanopool for 6hr average and find some rigs only have 170 MH/s avg.

settings differ cause i try...

1070: power 75 (high but i want stability, not really low power), core -200 (some -190 now), mem +680 (some +690). the rigs are very cool temps around 38-42 deg.

i put -r 120 so the client restarts (i find this give better hash?)

MY RX580 rigs are 100% stable there is no fluctiation but nvidia with ETH gives me headache plz help ;-)



ETH: 02/03/18-13:29:46 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 191.148 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:22
ETH: GPU0 31.876 Mh/s, GPU1 31.869 Mh/s, GPU2 31.899 Mh/s, GPU3 31.850 Mh/s, GPU4 31.756 Mh/s, GPU5 31.900 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/18-13:30:11 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 184.847 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:22
ETH: GPU0 31.192 Mh/s, GPU1 29.779 Mh/s, GPU2 31.177 Mh/s, GPU3 30.376 Mh/s, GPU4 31.250 Mh/s, GPU5 31.073 Mh/s
GPU0 t=39C fan=69%, GPU1 t=42C fan=69%, GPU2 t=41C fan=69%, GPU3 t=38C fan=69%, GPU4 t=32C fan=69%, GPU5 t=48C fan=69%
ETH: 02/03/18-13:30:27 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 174.012 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 23.557 Mh/s, GPU1 30.301 Mh/s, GPU2 30.699 Mh/s, GPU3 30.942 Mh/s, GPU4 30.857 Mh/s, GPU5 27.655 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/18-13:30:35 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 146.193 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 22.078 Mh/s, GPU1 22.095 Mh/s, GPU2 31.022 Mh/s, GPU3 22.006 Mh/s, GPU4 26.825 Mh/s, GPU5 22.167 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/18-13:30:43 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.880 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 31.674 Mh/s, GPU1 31.843 Mh/s, GPU2 31.833 Mh/s, GPU3 31.756 Mh/s, GPU4 31.142 Mh/s, GPU5 31.633 Mh/s
GPU0 t=39C fan=69%, GPU1 t=43C fan=69%, GPU2 t=43C fan=69%, GPU3 t=38C fan=69%, GPU4 t=32C fan=69%, GPU5 t=48C fan=69%
ETH: 02/03/18-13:30:50 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 191.070 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 31.879 Mh/s, GPU1 31.858 Mh/s, GPU2 31.790 Mh/s, GPU3 31.868 Mh/s, GPU4 31.859 Mh/s, GPU5 31.816 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/18-13:30:51 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 190.558 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 31.838 Mh/s, GPU1 31.822 Mh/s, GPU2 31.588 Mh/s, GPU3 31.853 Mh/s, GPU4 31.816 Mh/s, GPU5 31.641 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/18-13:31:12 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.109 Mh/s, Total Shares: 87, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 31.362 Mh/s, GPU1 31.209 Mh/s, GPU2 31.028 Mh/s, GPU3 31.851 Mh/s, GPU4 31.836 Mh/s, GPU5 31.823 Mh/s