I've heard that all tokens that will not be sold in the ICO process will be destroyed, is that true? Is this step aimed at supporting the price of the token?

Now I am using forkdelta instead of etherdelta I feel much comfort in forkdelta but I really disappointed with etherdelta horrible behaviour . I was the investor of etherdelta token sale . They raised 10 million even no news about that .

Actually pump and dump is a jargon used in investment as a term fraudulent activities. I think these people just want to deceived people and steal the money of their investors to earn instant income.

Math is hard so i wont pretend that i understand all of it,but im pretty sure team figured out everything and adjusted it to this lowered hard cap.

Hi Michael,

Thats a great question and point you have raised there.

There are many factors that have come into play which has effected this. For starters, when we first decided upon our hard cap, which is fixed to the price of ETH, the value of ETH was much lower. Our hard cap should really be set against a fixed amount of ETH, however we have already changed our hard cap twice and we want to refrain from consistently changing things and causing confusion.

Another reason for our hard cap being much lower than what you suggested above, is due to the community and there response. We originally set our hard cap to $60m. Since then we have had the community state that we should lower our hard cap.

The purpose of the hard cap is to stop an ICO from raising more than it needs. Our goal is $20m and therefore we have set our hard cap at $20m. Taking more than that would be greedy and unnecessary. We are here to empower the community with our technology, not take from them. We have a solid four plan which we have reviewed multiple times with many of our advisors who come from strong business backgrounds, from which we have strategically planned so that $20m covers the project for 4 years.

Due to us deciding upon the total supply back in 2017, this has also had an effect and therefore is the reason why we will be left with some many extra tokens. However, our smart contracts are designed to only mint the amount of FORCE that is purchased, meaning that if only 1m FORCE were bought, that would be all the FORCE that would exist. Rather than burning the rest of the supply, it makes more sense to only mint what is purchased. I hope that makes sense?

I understand that this may cause some confusion, but we are trying to balance between constantly changing things and causing confusion as well as getting things right. The way we see it is that, $20m is now our hard cap. That is what we need $20m to carry out our 4 year plan. Taking anymore than $20m would therefore be unnecessary.

So to answer your question, our hard cap is fixed at $20m. We will not take more than $20m. Whatever is minted, is final.

Thank you for raising this point, its a great question and I am sure it will help the rest of the community as well.

I hope I have answered your question? If there is any other questions you may have, I'd be happy to answer them.

~ Jake Ashby, General Manager TriForce Tokens
 

Hi all,

I'm working on this list of ICO definitions. This is a LIVING LIST, and I'm seeking input so that I can create a public glossary of sorts. Share your thoughts! I'll constantly update the definitions on this list based on new information. See the end of the list for sources...there will be many in addition to the feedback I get here.

This ICO DEFINITION LIST works in tandem with this HOW TO EVALUATE ICO OPPORTUNITIES list.

First, I am gathering a list of terms to be defined. Let me know what you'd like to add:

• DApp:
• Token:
• Utility Token:
• Security Token:
• Usage/Work Token:
• Use Case:
• Testnet:
• MVP:
• Hard Cap:
• Soft Cap:
• ROI:
• Marketcap:
• Freeze:
• Vesting:
• Staking:
• Masternodes:

Thanks in advance for your collaboration!


Sources:
1.

I do not advise you to try to make money on pamp groups. Only the organizers of pumps earn on them. Perhaps you will be able to make some money at first, but in the end you will lose all your money. There are no honest pump groups.

Good project ! This would surely make our lives easier as free lancers in the web . Coz most websites they get some of your eanings , greedy developers . Im hoping for your success ! Keep it up !

The idea has always attracted me! Create an environment (model it somehow, in a programming language). Define some life form (model their replication, mating, dying etc.) then let them live! Even could model a crypto into it, in order to test how it will be distributed 
The more complex their behavior, the more chaotic will the outcome be. But imagine one of these life forms continue to live! How would you feel, as their creator! 

I think it makes sense to invest in more than one coin. What is said here is just a suggestion. The most accurate is your own research.
I recommend that you research neo, iota and cardano. I think these are coins to be valued in the future.

Why people invest in ICO when it is risky and these days most of the coins are dropping. Do you think ICOs are going to survive for a long time?

What do you mean? I still have active connections in my wallet.

Bumping this thread because I noticed to today that Etherdelta was loading very quickly.  Fastest I've ever seen.  There is about a 5 second delay for the DDoS support, then about 5 seconds to load.  Used to take 30-60 seconds. 

It all applies to both current and future junior member account till you rank up with your activities count and merit. Check the link Lutpin posted above you.

You might also want to check out that link too.

Jr Members can no longer have signature links.