Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 66 results by MikeBuzz
Mhm? So its 960usd a month for 6x gtx1070?
Well yes if you are able to get $32 per day, which is very unlikely, looking at current profit and diff its down to $26 per day
https://whattomine.com/coins?utf8=%E2%9C%93&adapt_q_280x=0&adapt_q_380=0&adapt_q_fury=0&adapt_q_470=0&adapt_q_480=0&adapt_q_570=0&adapt_q_580=0&adapt_q_vega56=0&adapt_q_vega64=0&adapt_q_750Ti=0&adapt_q_1050Ti=0&adapt_q_10606=0&adapt_q_1070=6&adapt_1070=true&adapt_q_1070Ti=0&adapt_q_1080=0&adapt_q_1080Ti=0ð=true&factor%5Beth_hr%5D=180.0&factor%5Beth_p%5D=720.0&grof=true&factor%5Bgro_hr%5D=201.0&factor%5Bgro_p%5D=780.0&x11gf=true&factor%5Bx11g_hr%5D=69.0&factor%5Bx11g_p%5D=720.0&cn=true&factor%5Bcn_hr%5D=3780.0&factor%5Bcn_p%5D=600.0&eq=true&factor%5Beq_hr%5D=2580.0&factor%5Beq_p%5D=720.0&lre=true&factor%5Blrev2_hr%5D=213000.0&factor%5Blrev2_p%5D=780.0&ns=true&factor%5Bns_hr%5D=5400.0&factor%5Bns_p%5D=780.0&lbry=true&factor%5Blbry_hr%5D=1620.0&factor%5Blbry_p%5D=720.0&bk2bf=true&factor%5Bbk2b_hr%5D=9600.0&factor%5Bbk2b_p%5D=720.0&bk14=true&factor%5Bbk14_hr%5D=14400.0&factor%5Bbk14_p%5D=750.0&pas=true&factor%5Bpas_hr%5D=5700.0&factor%5Bpas_p%5D=720.0&skh=true&factor%5Bskh_hr%5D=165.0&factor%5Bskh_p%5D=720.0&factor%5Bl2z_hr%5D=420.0&factor%5Bl2z_p%5D=300.0&factor%5Bcost%5D=0.0&sort=Profit&volume=0&revenue=current&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=abucoins&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bitfinex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bittrex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bleutrade&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=cryptopia&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=hitbtc&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=poloniex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=yobit&dataset=Main&commit=Calculate
Your stats are here, also the pool your mining to default payout is 1eth
https://ethermine.org/miners/0C8575B7348b90a818273d138e2fC56fC15FA012
https://ethermine.org/miners/0C8575B7348b90a818273d138e2fC56fC15FA012
I cannot find a thread for hashrefinery, so I've sent the user hashrefinery a message, and I figure I'd leave one here to see if anyone else is having an issue.
There was a payout today for balances above 0.001BTC, and the pool shows it's paid out, but the txid it shows on the page is not found, and it has not hit my payment address... Yet, it's removed from my balance on hashrefinery. Does any one else show a valid payment or is it just me?
There was a payout today for balances above 0.001BTC, and the pool shows it's paid out, but the txid it shows on the page is not found, and it has not hit my payment address... Yet, it's removed from my balance on hashrefinery. Does any one else show a valid payment or is it just me?
Means they dont have enough BTC to pay and the tx actually failed.
Its been fixed now
was playing around with couple amd rigs , things i had to tinker with (all of them win10 x64 , august blockhain drv. , mix match of 480, 570 cards)
1. GPUGROUPS variable , had to change , line 220 , include.ps_ | Add-Member GpuPlatform (Get-Gpu-Platform $_.Type) -Force
had to add parameter -Force , to be able overwrite group name , since it was already created while i was tinkering.
2. had to add -I 18 to be able to run A-SgminerXevan.json
3. manually had to change dualmining pool to suprnova DCR in A-ClayDual.json , since Yiimp is permanently loaded and rejects all DCR connections.
"Arguments" : "-epool #SERVER#:#PORT# -ewal #LOGIN# -epsw #PASSWORD# -esm #ETHSTMODE# -allpools 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal myusername.amd1 -dpsw x -wd 1 -di #DEVICESCLAYMODE# -mport #APIPORT# -platform 1 #ALGORITHMPARAMETERS#"
4. Had to add to A-nsgminer.json additional parameters to be able to run it -w 128 -g 1 -I 18 to be able to run it
5. In A-CastXMR had to change --device with -G , otherwise only 1st gpu was used
6. Could you please add sgminer for x17 (verge)
p.s. forgot to mention , was running with following settings:
-MiningMode Automatic -PoolsName YIIMP,Mining_pool_hub,NANOPOOL -Coinsname DECRED,BITCORE,BITCOINGOLD,CHAINCOIN,DIGIBYTE,ETHEREUM,EXPANSE,ELECTRONEUM,ETHEREUMCLASIC,HUSH,LBRY,MONACOIN,ZENCASH,ZCASH,ZCOIN,
ZCLASSIC,KOMODO,MONERO,UBIQ,SIA,GROESTLCOIN,HSHARE,VERTCOIN,GOBYTE,FEATHERCOIN,LUXCOIN,DIGIBYTE,VERGE,BITSEND
1. GPUGROUPS variable , had to change , line 220 , include.ps_ | Add-Member GpuPlatform (Get-Gpu-Platform $_.Type) -Force
had to add parameter -Force , to be able overwrite group name , since it was already created while i was tinkering.
2. had to add -I 18 to be able to run A-SgminerXevan.json
3. manually had to change dualmining pool to suprnova DCR in A-ClayDual.json , since Yiimp is permanently loaded and rejects all DCR connections.
"Arguments" : "-epool #SERVER#:#PORT# -ewal #LOGIN# -epsw #PASSWORD# -esm #ETHSTMODE# -allpools 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal myusername.amd1 -dpsw x -wd 1 -di #DEVICESCLAYMODE# -mport #APIPORT# -platform 1 #ALGORITHMPARAMETERS#"
4. Had to add to A-nsgminer.json additional parameters to be able to run it -w 128 -g 1 -I 18 to be able to run it
5. In A-CastXMR had to change --device with -G , otherwise only 1st gpu was used
6. Could you please add sgminer for x17 (verge)
p.s. forgot to mention , was running with following settings:
-MiningMode Automatic -PoolsName YIIMP,Mining_pool_hub,NANOPOOL -Coinsname DECRED,BITCORE,BITCOINGOLD,CHAINCOIN,DIGIBYTE,ETHEREUM,EXPANSE,ELECTRONEUM,ETHEREUMCLASIC,HUSH,LBRY,MONACOIN,ZENCASH,ZCASH,ZCOIN,
ZCLASSIC,KOMODO,MONERO,UBIQ,SIA,GROESTLCOIN,HSHARE,VERTCOIN,GOBYTE,FEATHERCOIN,LUXCOIN,DIGIBYTE,VERGE,BITSEND
1. Config.txt explanation for @@GPU is wrong in current release, is fixed in master branch now, GPUplatform atribute must not exist on groups definitions, now is automatically calculated.
2. Added
3. Other way is change yiimp.ps1 file to ignore that pool
4. -w128 was included, others added now.
5. Reported hours ago in Github, Fixed this morning in master branch
6. The only one I found is an old Cryptomining blog release, It dont works for me.
Thx a lot
Thanks for all your hard work! I'm happy to donate to this as this saves me a great deal of time. Only issue I have is sometimes ccminer crashes when Megaminer closes it and results in a dialog box for me to close. Unfortunately Megaminer will not time out (watchdog?) so it will stand still until you click the box. Its caused me numerous nights of no work being done because of this. If possible, can you make sure ALL the process windows ** AND ** resulting dialogs are closed before switching algorithms. Thx.
-peZ
P.S. I'm a coder, just not Powershell.
You can disable the pop up from within windows
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/alejacma/2011/02/18/how-to-disable-the-pop-up-that-windows-shows-when-an-app-crashes/
I´m proud to present my new adquisition (Xfx 4gb), I hope this helps to test software and solve issues easier for me. I never had amd card before and It´s funny for me open this world.
As I say sometimes, I´m doing this program for me, as a hobby on my free time, and to return comunity some for free mining software I get past months, but still I want to thank donators for help to mitigate profit lost for time my rigs are stopped testing or failed with new alpha releases.
As I say sometimes, I´m doing this program for me, as a hobby on my free time, and to return comunity some for free mining software I get past months, but still I want to thank donators for help to mitigate profit lost for time my rigs are stopped testing or failed with new alpha releases.
Nice purchase, it will be worth testing out against some of the extra AMD miners from here
https://github.com/Fedeparma74/Megaminer/tree/Parma/Miners
tutulfo, how do I switch to internal wallet on nicehash?
The ugly way is to edit
The ugly way is to edit
Code:
$CoinsWallets.get_item('BTC')+'.'+$Workername
to:Code:
'nhaddress.'+$Workername
but is there a better way of doing it?See the following
https://github.com/tutulino/Megaminer/pull/106
Keeps looping on benchmark(something wrong with lbry 
):
Next Interval: 431 secs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E)nd Interval (P)rofits (C)urrent (H)istory (W)allets |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------ACTIVE MINERS----------------------------------------------------------
Speed BTC/Day EUR/Day Algorithm Coin Miner Pool Location PoolWorkers
----- ------- ------- --------- ---- ----- ---- -------- -----------
219.05 MH/s|255.56 MH/s Benchmarking Benchmarking ETHASH|LBRY ethereum| ClayDual40 NH|ZPOOL EUROPE
Any way to disable dualmine or lbry without changing in the powershellscript ?
I am gonna check more tomorrow, late now have to sleep
):Next Interval: 431 secs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E)nd Interval (P)rofits (C)urrent (H)istory (W)allets |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------ACTIVE MINERS----------------------------------------------------------
Speed BTC/Day EUR/Day Algorithm Coin Miner Pool Location PoolWorkers
----- ------- ------- --------- ---- ----- ---- -------- -----------
219.05 MH/s|255.56 MH/s Benchmarking Benchmarking ETHASH|LBRY ethereum| ClayDual40 NH|ZPOOL EUROPE
Any way to disable dualmine or lbry without changing in the powershellscript ?
I am gonna check more tomorrow, late now have to sleep
Check the stats file for this miner I bet the second row of numbers is 0, not sure why this happens but I have seen it before, delete the stats file and rerun it will then work
Will zpool and nemosminer support HShare soon ? = Yes
Can you tell us an approximated time frame when it will be supported?Zpool already support hsr and if you check out the latest hit commits its already there in Nemos
Or check out
https://github.com/MikeBuzz/Megaminer/releases
Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher
Have added phi and hsr algos
https://github.com/MikeBuzz/Megaminer/releases/tag/4.6
will be tweaking to use best miner over the next few days
https://github.com/MikeBuzz/Megaminer/releases/tag/4.6
will be tweaking to use best miner over the next few days
Anybody want a faster xevan miner?
Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
not profitable anymore, maybe you cna try to make a faster phi miner, now we are at 13.3 MH for a 1070
Which miner are you using for phi?
Thanks for all the comments guys. Perhaps I should take a step back a bit.
On whattomine.com what would I enter in the top two lines of boxes. The 480 by default is set to 3 and when I edit this to zero and add 6 in to the 1070 box everything goes to 0.
What am I doing wrong?
On whattomine.com what would I enter in the top two lines of boxes. The 480 by default is set to 3 and when I edit this to zero and add 6 in to the 1070 box everything goes to 0.
What am I doing wrong?
Try this
http://whattomine.com/coins?utf8=✓&adapt_q_280x=0&adapt_q_380=0&adapt_q_fury=0&adapt_q_470=0&adapt_q_480=3&adapt_q_570=0&adapt_q_580=0&adapt_q_750Ti=0&adapt_q_10606=0&adapt_q_1070=6&adapt_1070=true&adapt_q_1080=0&adapt_q_1080Ti=0ð=true&factor%5Beth_hr%5D=180.0&factor%5Beth_p%5D=720.0&grof=true&factor%5Bgro_hr%5D=213.0&factor%5Bgro_p%5D=780.0&x11gf=true&factor%5Bx11g_hr%5D=69.0&factor%5Bx11g_p%5D=720.0&cn=true&factor%5Bcn_hr%5D=3000.0&factor%5Bcn_p%5D=600.0&eq=true&factor%5Beq_hr%5D=2580.0&factor%5Beq_p%5D=720.0&lre=true&factor%5Blrev2_hr%5D=213000.0&factor%5Blrev2_p%5D=780.0&ns=true&factor%5Bns_hr%5D=6300.0&factor%5Bns_p%5D=930.0&lbry=true&factor%5Blbry_hr%5D=1620.0&factor%5Blbry_p%5D=720.0&bk2bf=true&factor%5Bbk2b_hr%5D=9600.0&factor%5Bbk2b_p%5D=720.0&bk14=true&factor%5Bbk14_hr%5D=15000.0&factor%5Bbk14_p%5D=750.0&pas=true&factor%5Bpas_hr%5D=5640.0&factor%5Bpas_p%5D=720.0&skh=true&factor%5Bskh_hr%5D=159.0&factor%5Bskh_p%5D=720.0&factor%5Bl2z_hr%5D=420.0&factor%5Bl2z_p%5D=300.0&factor%5Bcost%5D=0.1&sort=Profitability24&volume=0&revenue=24h&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bittrex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bleutrade&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bter&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=c_cex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=cryptopia&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=hitbtc&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=poloniex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=yobit&dataset=Main&commit=Calculate
I see that 3 is still placed in 480. I'm assuming 480 is a separate graphics card? Doesn't this skew the calculations if it's calculating as 3x 480s and 6x 1070s?
You have to click the graphics card model so it highlights in either Red or Green, only those highlighted are used in the calculations
Thanks for all the comments guys. Perhaps I should take a step back a bit.
On whattomine.com what would I enter in the top two lines of boxes. The 480 by default is set to 3 and when I edit this to zero and add 6 in to the 1070 box everything goes to 0.
What am I doing wrong?
On whattomine.com what would I enter in the top two lines of boxes. The 480 by default is set to 3 and when I edit this to zero and add 6 in to the 1070 box everything goes to 0.
What am I doing wrong?
Try this
http://whattomine.com/coins?utf8=✓&adapt_q_280x=0&adapt_q_380=0&adapt_q_fury=0&adapt_q_470=0&adapt_q_480=3&adapt_q_570=0&adapt_q_580=0&adapt_q_750Ti=0&adapt_q_10606=0&adapt_q_1070=6&adapt_1070=true&adapt_q_1080=0&adapt_q_1080Ti=0ð=true&factor%5Beth_hr%5D=180.0&factor%5Beth_p%5D=720.0&grof=true&factor%5Bgro_hr%5D=213.0&factor%5Bgro_p%5D=780.0&x11gf=true&factor%5Bx11g_hr%5D=69.0&factor%5Bx11g_p%5D=720.0&cn=true&factor%5Bcn_hr%5D=3000.0&factor%5Bcn_p%5D=600.0&eq=true&factor%5Beq_hr%5D=2580.0&factor%5Beq_p%5D=720.0&lre=true&factor%5Blrev2_hr%5D=213000.0&factor%5Blrev2_p%5D=780.0&ns=true&factor%5Bns_hr%5D=6300.0&factor%5Bns_p%5D=930.0&lbry=true&factor%5Blbry_hr%5D=1620.0&factor%5Blbry_p%5D=720.0&bk2bf=true&factor%5Bbk2b_hr%5D=9600.0&factor%5Bbk2b_p%5D=720.0&bk14=true&factor%5Bbk14_hr%5D=15000.0&factor%5Bbk14_p%5D=750.0&pas=true&factor%5Bpas_hr%5D=5640.0&factor%5Bpas_p%5D=720.0&skh=true&factor%5Bskh_hr%5D=159.0&factor%5Bskh_p%5D=720.0&factor%5Bl2z_hr%5D=420.0&factor%5Bl2z_p%5D=300.0&factor%5Bcost%5D=0.1&sort=Profitability24&volume=0&revenue=24h&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bittrex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bleutrade&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=bter&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=c_cex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=cryptopia&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=hitbtc&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=poloniex&factor%5Bexchanges%5D%5B%5D=yobit&dataset=Main&commit=Calculate
Well right now profit have dropped and are still dropping, you would be lucky to make £8 per day with that setup if not paying for electricity, so would look at over a year to make the money that the setup has cost you back again. You might be better to just invest the money in some coins.
I have 6x 470 setup you could have for £2k 🤣
I have 6x 470 setup you could have for £2k 🤣
Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher
I have just updated https://github.com/MikeBuzz/Megaminer to include Xevan, will push the commit upstream later today
Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher
i noticed that i had a lot better benchmarks on nemosminer for c11 with the alexis78 version.
unfortunately in megaminer by default there is just one version for c11 activated, so i have just added c11 into the /Miners/ccminerAlexis78.json myself.
the one i just added to the config, ccminerAlexis78, gives me 117.87 MH/s, while the old default one gave me just around 95 MH/s.
it's a performance gain of more than 20%, and it's currently the best algo to mine on zpool.
what i like from nemosminer is that it has multiple ccminers for the same algo, so that your benchmark will decide which version to actually use based on the best performance.
of course this will take more time benchmarking, but that's just a one time thing that needs to be done, and after that it will just produce more money for same equipment.
having multiple ccminers per algo is something that should also be added to megaminer by default i think. let the benchmarks decide which one is best rather than making the choice yourself i front.
----
checking some more,
HMQ1725, i ad 29.82 MH/s with the default ccminer-2.2
i have just added it to the ccminerTpruvot and i'm getting 30.61 MH/s
this is yet another example where nemosminer out of the box is quicker than megaminer because of having multiple ccminers per algo.
i think this should be implemented soon, to be able to be just as quick as nemosminer, at this moment megaminer is slower just because of this reason.
unfortunately in megaminer by default there is just one version for c11 activated, so i have just added c11 into the /Miners/ccminerAlexis78.json myself.
the one i just added to the config, ccminerAlexis78, gives me 117.87 MH/s, while the old default one gave me just around 95 MH/s.
it's a performance gain of more than 20%, and it's currently the best algo to mine on zpool.
what i like from nemosminer is that it has multiple ccminers for the same algo, so that your benchmark will decide which version to actually use based on the best performance.
of course this will take more time benchmarking, but that's just a one time thing that needs to be done, and after that it will just produce more money for same equipment.
having multiple ccminers per algo is something that should also be added to megaminer by default i think. let the benchmarks decide which one is best rather than making the choice yourself i front.
----
checking some more,
HMQ1725, i ad 29.82 MH/s with the default ccminer-2.2
i have just added it to the ccminerTpruvot and i'm getting 30.61 MH/s
this is yet another example where nemosminer out of the box is quicker than megaminer because of having multiple ccminers per algo.
i think this should be implemented soon, to be able to be just as quick as nemosminer, at this moment megaminer is slower just because of this reason.
I had noticed the same so I created the following
https://github.com/MikeBuzz/Megaminer
This has been setup with the best ccminers per Algo that I have tested with a 1070, you can just copy the miners files to your current version and they will work
Where do i find this dcri setting please?
are you using the nicehash gui? or using claymore? if using claymore just add -dcri 120 to you command line, if using nicehash you might have a setting somewhere for extra miner commands
Got my card in, up and running.
Power 80%
Core +100
Memory +400
Fan Spd 75%
Steady at 58 degrees C
daggerhash 26.5 MH/s
decred 847 MH/s
First clock changes, will see how it runs overnight and add more.
Looks ok so far guys? (Mining on NiceHash)
Power 80%
Core +100
Memory +400
Fan Spd 75%
Steady at 58 degrees C
daggerhash 26.5 MH/s
decred 847 MH/s
First clock changes, will see how it runs overnight and add more.
Looks ok so far guys? (Mining on NiceHash)
Worth playing with the -dcri setting with -dcri 120 I get about 30.5mhs eth and 1ghs decred
Is that in the nvidia driver control panel or Afterburner?
Your using the nicehash gui miner right?
Got my card in, up and running.
Power 80%
Core +100
Memory +400
Fan Spd 75%
Steady at 58 degrees C
daggerhash 26.5 MH/s
decred 847 MH/s
First clock changes, will see how it runs overnight and add more.
Looks ok so far guys? (Mining on NiceHash)
Power 80%
Core +100
Memory +400
Fan Spd 75%
Steady at 58 degrees C
daggerhash 26.5 MH/s
decred 847 MH/s
First clock changes, will see how it runs overnight and add more.
Looks ok so far guys? (Mining on NiceHash)
Worth playing with the -dcri setting with -dcri 120 I get about 30.5mhs eth and 1ghs decred
I have two rigs... one is 7x ASUS DUAL OC GTX 1070s.
I get about 460 sol/sec on EWBF 0.34 on Equihash, and 30.5MH/sec on Claymore dualmining Equihash and Sia (total of 214MH/sec for the rig), at around 145W per card.
The other rig is 5x Gigabyte Windforce GTX 1070 and 1x MSI Duke GTX 1070.
For Equihash, the Gigabytes get around 470-480, and the MSI can reach 500 - but these cards are much heavier on the power draw, even with power turned down.
On Claymore dual-mining ETH and Sia I get around 31.5MH/sec (total of around 188MH/sec for the rig).
Great performance but I would suggest the DUALs if electricity cost is a big factor for you.
What I am curious about is Lyra2z settings. My Gigabyte and MSI rig together gets about 9000kH/sec (averageing 1500kH/s per card) when mining ZCoin.
I'm not at all sure what the best overclock settings for this algo are, so any input would be appreciated.
I get about 460 sol/sec on EWBF 0.34 on Equihash, and 30.5MH/sec on Claymore dualmining Equihash and Sia (total of 214MH/sec for the rig), at around 145W per card.
The other rig is 5x Gigabyte Windforce GTX 1070 and 1x MSI Duke GTX 1070.
For Equihash, the Gigabytes get around 470-480, and the MSI can reach 500 - but these cards are much heavier on the power draw, even with power turned down.
On Claymore dual-mining ETH and Sia I get around 31.5MH/sec (total of around 188MH/sec for the rig).
Great performance but I would suggest the DUALs if electricity cost is a big factor for you.
What I am curious about is Lyra2z settings. My Gigabyte and MSI rig together gets about 9000kH/sec (averageing 1500kH/s per card) when mining ZCoin.
I'm not at all sure what the best overclock settings for this algo are, so any input would be appreciated.
Try this build of ccminer for lyra2z
https://github.com/Nanashi-Meiyo-Meijin/ccminer/releases/
Im about to take the plunge and buy a 1070... can anyone recommend a brand/model please?
Try to get one with Samsung memory. That being said I don't know any producer that uses just Samsung memory so good luck.
Just ordered this.
Next day delivery.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/zotac-geforce-gtx-1070-mini-8192mb-gddr5-pci-express-graphics-card-zt-p10700g-10m-gx-10r-zt.html
I have that card, mine has Micron memory
Not fussed on my memory at this stage, Im in the very early stages of my mining career. This card will go into my gaming system, will be left on overnight to mine. In time, i plan on making a dedicated mining rig.
I have tweaked a version of MegaMiner, at the moment each algo is using the fastest miner i can find
https://github.com/MikeBuzz/Megaminer