By request of Mikemike, the escrow coins are now staking

what happens to the holders of viorcoin in case of an take over ?? are the coins lost or just the name changes ??

Well, The need of the hour is doing more than "JUST TALL TALKS" be it on any coloured paper. Anyways PM your vior address....

New wallet will be released soon

take a look
http://www.cryptophone.de  

We need to have a whitepaper, Even MIKE would readily help us through it and many other if we need them -http://startuphangar.com/

I had 0.02btc on a buy order for Kore. instead, I donated it. I know it is not much but as you said, it can add up. hope it helps. good luck!

Donated .2 to the cause  TxId d560df2e6177ae1a58ab9720ad3165ad1e6581a9a3b3cbe3aa4b7e87369854ad

13xcUHggtpUcip2bZT4wd9FcK3PENNv3oD

Everyone else help out too

Any eta for new wallet?

can you also list kore wallet address for donations. I will send a little not much...

Thanks MM,

1) Yes I thought so, I just wanted to clarify that before we got too in depth on the charging of the VOIP, although it is a discussion that should always be progressing it currently seems it is not a vital point for the next release.

2) If we could somehow lock the browser tab unless the wallet is staking, that would guarantee users would atleast need some coins in the wallet to use the feature, but would not limit it to larger KORE holders like setting a minimum holding requirement would.

3) We may have to just use a VOIP service first, then as it moves forward setup our own. Is this the part VIOR could potentially setup and we pay them as the service provider, I recall you mentioning something like this?

4) Does this mean that it won't be coded from scratch, more based on 3rd party software? It sounds like FIRE can continue if things get back on track which is good.

5) I will go ahead and donate .1 or 2 in the next couple of days, it might mean pulling my small buy support, hopefully some other junk sells though hehe.

 

made a little donation, hope it helps


Community!!!!

help with whatever you can

0.01btc - 0.02btc - 0.03btc

whatever you can

13xcUHggtpUcip2bZT4wd9FcK3PENNv3oD

1) Is the updated VOIP going to be in the next wallet release, or just the FIRE browser? I agree we should finish current projects first, so if FIRE is first we should be discussing that.

2) If the VOIP is in the next release I think we should have free wallet to wallet calls, if its possible to make it that the wallets would have to be staking something at least... that should be good enough. If we can't force the wallets to be staking to enable interwallet calls that is not so bad, at least it would help exposure and increase overall adoption.

3) Any calls to external networks and charging for them, well that discussion looks intense and I haven't read it all and need some sleep

So what is the most urgent priority today?

Yes $100 seems like a lot and that is in USD so may have a different ability for other countries who are impoverished. But these impoverished people do not get to use the service for free just because they can't afford it. So the market will determine who has $100/$50/$25 to buy coin with and who doesn't just won't use the service. The fee isn't set $100 is a good starting point though.

The $100 is a lifetime of use. It also Stakes to make calls so you make money when calling, 25% or (X%) goes to Kore to pay for the service. If no one can afford the $100 then no one buys the coin and it stagnates, but at least it is there for those who can afford to use it. If you just make it free then it may go away by default if anyone could download the wallet and call for free. The coin has no real meaning at that point.

To combine the best of both worlds though charge a fee for those who do not want to buy the $100 worth of coin and then allow the people who bought the $100 worth of coin to Stake and make those Fees. That way you can casually use the service for a fee that goes to the entire network.


Yep, but I don't think it should change later. I think if you implement the minimum Coin Value Stake to Make calls and a Call per minute type scenario for a fee it drives buying and that also supports the selling of the Staking which Kore gets 25% and makes that more lucrative rather than just have money funneled through to BTC and pay the developers. Support in Market Cap is more important in the long run. Essentially the buying of the coin to make calls with shows Investor class adoption. This also allows investors to be paid for their investment even if the coin doesn't go up in price, they get their money back over time. People who don't want to invest and just use the coin pay the Fee and the investors get a portion if Staking.

It really grows exponentially from there since at that point the coin could be worth more than the fee and fractions can be used to pay with. Now the Staking percentages can also be set up as a Cost Structure instead of an Inflationary view. If you consider that Market Cap may exceed the base of cost for a lower level of service, you will need to then scale to meet the demand. This would have to be setup intrinsically within the Staking percentage. Everyone would agree to a higher percentage since they know it must grow at a higher rate than most coins who just value based on trade. Kore has services and must meet any financial aspects as any normal corporation would be required to. Yet still be decentralized. It is a very tight rope to walk.