Done, I've proved you wrong.

No, you haven't.

By that, you mean a guy who paid $300 for programming work and wants a $3000 refund, along with others.

Anyone who uses CoinLenders, or invests with BTCINVEST knows that I don't scam.

That's background context

It's OK, you're not going to get any emails to your inbox.

Milkshake, I thought you were pretty good before, but now I've realized you're just pretty much bluffing with everyone. Don't worry, your day will come, and that scammer accusations thread is going to be very funny.

Here's some pretty old chat logs that BTCTalkAccounts know I have already (so no harm in disclosing them);

a: we need eyes on DiamondCardz

b: who is he?

a: some bitcoiner guy, I need to know what he knows, he's helping Trade

b: this guy? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=55122

c: whats up with you today? you're paranoid like hell today

d: I've locked myself out of the antwoorp server, can anyone with root reset my google auth?

a: he's digging info he could be a risk, he's helping that aussie prick

a: and who knows r3wt who gave him info he's fucking leaked it to trade what did he know?

a: wtf is up with all those posts on scotaloo? the password was changed too I've told you fuckers about doing that stop it now and abandon that account, it's a risk!

d: yeah somebody was looking for DiamondCardz docs a few days ago, he's a definite risk, I think it's on antwoorp but I'm fucking locked out, nobody cares, really?

a: guys whats with all those posts on that scotaloo account? are you trying to fuck us up?

a: Aussie guy is now a high priority we have DiamondCards docs but we need to know everything he knows and the same for r3wt

a: who the fuck is posting on scotaloo btw?

d: yeah sorry bro I got carried away it was me, I'm jumping ship now

a: you were supposed to be handling trade

d: I got locked out, nobody will help me, nothing I could do, I was trying to distract him

d: btw do we have anything to do with BASICasic? it's exposed

a: omg! idiot!

a: anyways, trade is a top priority now, everyone working on **** drop your shit and handle him, I want DiamondCardz looked after too we need eyes on him

e: I dont think trade is such a problem i think ur over reacting here what can possibly he know?

a: I have a gut feeling something is up with him.

f: don't worry I'll handle Diamond, he's only 15 don't go hard on him

a: I only want you to eye him nothing else no contact at all he can't know much but he might be able to help us with the aussie, they're in communication.

g: that TradeFortress guy is definitely a problem I looked into it the guy is well known, I'm on the case now

a: good, and what about r3wt, is nobody going to confess? tell us what he know?

d: I tried to figure out earlier, I think he knows something about Blazr

a: who's blazer?

g: we hired him a while ago to make the mass bitcointalk account creating script and he posted on a sock for a while

d: thats the nick I was trying to find! I grilled r3wt earlier, all he knows is that Blazr is connected, he could be a risk, I dont think it warrants eyes on Blazr though

g: confirmed, Blazr knows nothing, other than the fact we create and operate lots of alts

a: I don't like this whole situation at all...this is starting to become big how many alts are exposed?

d: not that many, they're all dead ends

a: OK we need a list we're abandoning every one of them, and where is Blazr?

g: he finished a while ago

a: who is he? do we have dox?

g: no idea we never doxed him, he didnt know much so there was no need

a: I want Blazr's dox too,

You'll have to admit that you'll (BTCTalkAccounts) accept a ban by theymos if you are proven to be an alt of BTCTalkAccounts. I'll reveal the evidence right here.

Want me to do that and cut off one of your sources for new accounts like this one?

I don't recommend making contact with a phisher and extorter, especially one that uses a purchased account to hide their identity.

I've been investigating the BTCTalkAccounts ring and I've uncovered quite a bit. For more info, see the scotaloo thread and such.

You're pretty dumb, BTCTalkAccounts.

Dear readers, here is a message that came to me. Could you please help me to understand the second intentions (if any) of the sender? Is possible to use the information this guy demands to damage coinlenders or its users? Thanks a lot.

Your atrocious grammar makes it hard to take you seriously.

Milkshake ruined his own release by trying to premine some 1360 blocks. Why are we still having this discussion? I did you guys a favor by exposing what was going on. Don't kill the whistleblower.

Isn't that simply a future?

The one starting with 199 is mine, the one starting with 96 belongs to arjay45.  Between the two of them, you'll probably connect to one or the other between crashes of elacoind.  Both of us are seeing elacoind crash (segfault) every few minutes.

IRC got join
connection timeout
trying connection 198.199.86.4 lastseen=0.0hrs
IRC got join
IRC got join
Added 50.137.151.133:7688 from 92.243.23.21: 17 tried, 308 new
IRC got new address: 50.137.151.133:7688
connection timeout
trying connection 86.157.191.43:9223 lastseen=0.1hrs
connected 86.157.191.43:9223
send version message: version 60001, blocks=0, us=82.168.107.39:9223, them=86.157.191.43:9223, peer=86.157.191.43:9223
trying connection 198.199.86.4 lastseen=0.0hrs
Added time data, samples 6, offset +2 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60001, blocks=4992, us=82.168.107.39:53994, them=86.157.191.43:9223, peer=86.157.191.43:9223
IRC got join
received block ee79864ed6088eaef4c6
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : nBits below minimum work
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
received block 93fc3aef72622cded90d
ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : nBits below minimum work
ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
disconnecting node 86.157.191.43:9223
Disconnected 86.157.191.43:9223 for misbehavior (score=100)
IRC got join
connection timeout
trying connection 54.245.12.125:9223 lastseen=0.1hrs
IRC got join
connection timeout
trying connection 198.199.86.4 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 118.210.234.30:9223 lastseen=0.1hrs
connected 118.210.234.30:9223
send version message: version 60001, blocks=0, us=82.168.107.39:9223, them=118.210.234.30:9223, peer=118.210.234.30:9223
trying connection 198.199.86.4 lastseen=0.0hrs