Search content
Sort by
Showing 15 of 15 results by MinerMinor
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Not exact science okay. But a 42% variance is a bit extreme, no? And it's been over a week like this. Honestly wondering if the 0% fee is being hidden. Just realized forgot to mention this is for RavenMiner.com pool.
ravencalc.xyz is fairly innaccurate and generally over estimates by a large margin. I have implemented a more accurate calculator in my miner, give it a shot if you'd like.
Ravencoin Miner: an optimized open source miner created specifically for Ravencoin.
v2.5
Optimizations to all hash functions:
bmw, jh, blake, groestl, keccak, skein, luffa, cubehash, echo, shavite, simd, fugue, hamsi, shabal, whirlpool, sha
v2.4
Cubehash and Keccak Optimizations
Can color RVN/day line with secondary release Ravencoin Miner v2.4 (COLOR)
Note: See color.txt
v2.3
Fix miner not submitting shares when Hamsi was first Hash function!
6% increase in overall hash rate!
v2.2
Kraww!
Added estimate for RVN earned per day (displays every 5th share)
https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases
Already using your miner. It estimates 221 Raven per day. I guess it's time to switch pools. No one else is having these earning issues with RavenMiner.com pool?
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Not exact science okay. But a 42% variance is a bit extreme, no? And it's been over a week like this. Honestly wondering if the 0% fee is being hidden. Just realized forgot to mention this is for RavenMiner.com pool.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Posted this at the pool announcement thread, but realized this thread is actually active:
Can someone please explain the discrepancy between the amount paid out since it's 0% fee?
https://s9.postimg.cc/vd8p2wngf/hashrate.png
https://s9.postimg.cc/xukgaax3z/rvncalc.png
Total paid for past 24 hours is 130 Raven. According to http://ravencalc.xyz/ with 40 Mh/s I would get around 228 Raven in 24 hours. That's 42% less earned than what is projected.
Can someone please explain the discrepancy between the amount paid out since it's 0% fee?
https://s9.postimg.cc/vd8p2wngf/hashrate.png
https://s9.postimg.cc/xukgaax3z/rvncalc.png
Total paid for past 24 hours is 130 Raven. According to http://ravencalc.xyz/ with 40 Mh/s I would get around 228 Raven in 24 hours. That's 42% less earned than what is projected.
Re: [ANN][POOL] RavenMiner.com - Dedicated Ravencoin (RVN) Pool
Can someone please explain the discrepancy between the amount paid out since it's 0% fee?
https://s9.postimg.cc/vd8p2wngf/hashrate.png
https://s9.postimg.cc/xukgaax3z/rvncalc.png
Total paid for past 24 hours is 130 Raven. According to http://ravencalc.xyz/ with 40 Mh/s I would get around 228 Raven in 24 hours. That's 42% less earned than what is projected.
https://s9.postimg.cc/vd8p2wngf/hashrate.png
https://s9.postimg.cc/xukgaax3z/rvncalc.png
Total paid for past 24 hours is 130 Raven. According to http://ravencalc.xyz/ with 40 Mh/s I would get around 228 Raven in 24 hours. That's 42% less earned than what is projected.
Re: Ravencoin Miner: an optimized open source miner for Ravencoin
v2.5 is extremely laggy vs v2.4 on my GTX970. Seems to be same hashrate. Any way of getting it toned down again? Before it was possible to use computer for light browsing while mining.
Give a slightly lower intensity a try. You can also use non-integers like 19.5 or 19.9 or whatever
That should help
Thanks! Will try. What is the default intensity? (if bat file is blank with nothing specified)
Re: Ravencoin Miner: an optimized open source miner for Ravencoin
v2.5 is extremely laggy vs v2.4 on my GTX970. Seems to be same hashrate. Any way of getting it toned down again? Before it was possible to use computer for light browsing while mining.
Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - New Ver, P104-100 support, 970+ fixed
Interesting. I set it to OFF and yet under the GUI it still shows P2. Any idea?
http://img.techpowerup.org/180226/nvidia-20180226-142516.png
http://img.techpowerup.org/180226/nvidia-20180226-142516.png
Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - New Ver, P104-100 support, 970+ fixed
I have another problem now though...
After updating the rig to the fall creator's update - and new nVidia drivers 391.01 I lost 25% hashrate (from 1350 to 1040 kH/s). I have been running the high priority miner, using parameters -i 5 -c 4. I also now seem to get a lot of "Share rejected, invalid job ID" messages. No idea if related or what's going on. Any ideas?
HODL your horses, my mistake.After updating the rig to the fall creator's update - and new nVidia drivers 391.01 I lost 25% hashrate (from 1350 to 1040 kH/s). I have been running the high priority miner, using parameters -i 5 -c 4. I also now seem to get a lot of "Share rejected, invalid job ID" messages. No idea if related or what's going on. Any ideas?
I had forgotten to switch back to forcing P0 state.
All good, back to good ol'speeds.
How do you force p0 state? And does this affect 1070 Ti's too?
Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - New Ver, P104-100 support, 970+ fixed
Windows 10 1709 (build 16299.248)
3x nVidia 1070 Ti @ 100% PL, +200 core, +700 memory
Biostar 250-BTC
4gb ram
80gb page file
With 388 this worked just fine with no errors.
Jumping to 390 this causes errors. Even at 70% PL same thing. I had to drop it down to 50% and only then it would not cause that error. So I downgraded back to 388 drivers and run at 100% PL right now until we can debug it?
3x nVidia 1070 Ti @ 100% PL, +200 core, +700 memory
Biostar 250-BTC
4gb ram
80gb page file
With 388 this worked just fine with no errors.
Jumping to 390 this causes errors. Even at 70% PL same thing. I had to drop it down to 50% and only then it would not cause that error. So I downgraded back to 388 drivers and run at 100% PL right now until we can debug it?
I don't know if I will be able to debug such problem. Don't you think that +200 core + 700 mem is too much for your gpu? Have you tried to reduce overclocking with 390.77 drivers?
I dropped it down to +400 memory (like you have yours I believe?) and it's working okay without any hashrate penalty. I am still on the 388 drivers though. +700 worked okay for all other algoths/miners before. Will eventually upgrade drivers again I suppose. Until then thanks and keep up the great work!
4,190 hashrate for 3x 1070 Ti at 100% PL, +200 core, +400 memory
Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - New Ver, P104-100 support, 970+ fixed
Windows 10 1709 (build 16299.248)
3x nVidia 1070 Ti @ 100% PL, +200 core, +700 memory
Biostar 250-BTC
4gb ram
80gb page file
With 388 this worked just fine with no errors.
Jumping to 390 this causes errors. Even at 70% PL same thing. I had to drop it down to 50% and only then it would not cause that error. So I downgraded back to 388 drivers and run at 100% PL right now until we can debug it?
3x nVidia 1070 Ti @ 100% PL, +200 core, +700 memory
Biostar 250-BTC
4gb ram
80gb page file
With 388 this worked just fine with no errors.
Jumping to 390 this causes errors. Even at 70% PL same thing. I had to drop it down to 50% and only then it would not cause that error. So I downgraded back to 388 drivers and run at 100% PL right now until we can debug it?
Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - New Ver, P104-100 support, 970+ fixed
For anyone having the miner stop with the following error:
It's because of newer nVidia drivers. Can confirm it happened to me on latest drivers (390.x) and when I downgraded back to 388.3x it seems to work again. Looks to be an issue with original palgin miner too as per: https://github.com/palginpav/hsrminer/issues/9
Hopefully this fork can be updated so we can use latest drivers in case of any future speed ups happen.
Quote
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1070' at line 1460
It's because of newer nVidia drivers. Can confirm it happened to me on latest drivers (390.x) and when I downgraded back to 388.3x it seems to work again. Looks to be an issue with original palgin miner too as per: https://github.com/palginpav/hsrminer/issues/9
Hopefully this fork can be updated so we can use latest drivers in case of any future speed ups happen.
Oh geeze. 80-100? Let's say 90 H/s. So $3.50 for the MONTH according to https://www.cryptocompare.com/mining/calculator/xmr?HashingPower=90&HashingUnit=H%2Fs&PowerConsumption=0&CostPerkWh=0&MiningPoolFee=0
Is that accurate? lol
Is that accurate? lol
Jumped in to try it out.
In US we get $200 promo credit and at the VM rental page I see 2 viable options:
The one you list is D4S_V3 for $143 for 4 CPUs.
I also see a B8MS for $252 for 8 CPUs.
Any idea on the profitability of the 4 CPUs you suggested? Trying to see if it's worth to go for 8 for less than 2x the rental price.
In US we get $200 promo credit and at the VM rental page I see 2 viable options:
The one you list is D4S_V3 for $143 for 4 CPUs.
I also see a B8MS for $252 for 8 CPUs.
Any idea on the profitability of the 4 CPUs you suggested? Trying to see if it's worth to go for 8 for less than 2x the rental price.