Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 126 results by Mitak
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: 55nm Bitfury chips - Direct 220V Project
by
Mitak
on 27/01/2017, 20:35:42 UTC
I think , that power part of the design is not going to be bottleneck , here.
The SPI will be pain in the ass, You will have to use some kind of level shifting.
RPI is too much of  a mess for my taste too
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 18/09/2016, 14:21:06 UTC
Yes you are right , but:
5 V 1.2 A it is what - 6 W
with 6 W with theoretical specs current 16 nm generation of Bitfury you will get roughly 50-60 Ghs tops and the chip will be hot as hell, so the device will need good coiling - heat sink alone will have trouble to handle the heat or it have to be oversize .
This is my reason
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 15/09/2016, 23:41:20 UTC
The USb flash drive type miner is very limited in terms of current (power) if it have to be USB 2.0 compatible
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 15/09/2016, 23:39:22 UTC
I completely understand.
I'm under NDA with design team myself ( signed one ), but only one 16 nm chip here.
I do not know what contract they have with the chip manufacturer
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 15/09/2016, 23:08:23 UTC
Smiley
OK
fair enough
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 15/09/2016, 22:58:40 UTC
Two different 16 nm chips you say.
I suspect you are under NDA, but if I speculate and say this might be Bit fury and Bitmain.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
So from here you steeped on ground level 0 at least
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 14/09/2016, 07:36:46 UTC
Any news here ?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly"
by
Mitak
on 20/08/2016, 06:49:09 UTC
I know a person that had one sample for design tests a few months ago , but not sure what happened next .

Just out of curiosity.

Has anyone (except people directly related to BitFury) got there hands on one of BitFury's 16nm chips, or maybe is there anyone who bought the containerized solution? And if yes, what are your experiences with either of the 2 (chips and/or container)?

Or is BitFury's typical answer that the minimum order quantity is 1 million USD, without stating how many chips that would be, and that their 1st batch is sold out Smiley


Furthermore, seeing that the minimum investment needed is apparently 1 million USD, I wonder whom they addressing when the thread reads "16nm...sales to public starting shortly", and how is this supposed to help decentralization of the BTC network as was stated in the quote of the 1st entry in this thread?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 28/03/2016, 18:52:51 UTC
Yep for single chip nanofury style is ok.
I ever did single chip.
Again I'm sorry I  do not have access from here to the  C code
But if you still need it I will be able to send it in a day or two
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 28/03/2016, 17:35:48 UTC
So, as mentioned earlier, the proof-of-concept I'm working on now is based on the Avalon A3218. As there isn't a publicly-available datasheet on the A3218, I'm assuming the protocol works about the same as documented in the A3222 datashet.

So today I started setting up a test rig to establish SPI communication with one of the chips. But I need to know what data to send it. If anyone's got advice on this, I'd be happy to hear it.

Specifically, stuff like the A3222 datasheet gives three clock configuration segments, but I don't know why. And especially a means of calculating the midstate and other preprocessed values (a0, e0, etc). I'm spending time parsing through cgminer code, but by now there's a heck of a lot of cgminer code to look through and I figure surely after 3 years of Avalon products in the wild someone knows how those calculations work. Mostly I just need a valid sample I can push to the chip and see if it talks back with something that seems in any way "correct".

And yes, if it helps motivate someone to assist a bit, I will try to implement an A3218 stickminer based around this work.
Hi,
I've always used MCU to communicate with Avalon chips.
A3222 was similar to gen 2 and 3
I can dig for the code for 3222 I'll be able to do this in my old lab
It is a firmware cod in C
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly"
by
Mitak
on 26/03/2016, 18:51:18 UTC
Any rummors on s9?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 26/03/2016, 18:49:57 UTC
Nothing official, only rumors Wink
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 12/03/2016, 16:32:12 UTC
There are no news from Bitfury , avalon is the second choice did you both with kilo managed to get chip docs or you  just do reverse engineering ?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 03/03/2016, 19:00:27 UTC
I did not realize that sidehack did not get the chip info yet.
They will for sure provide a sample as soon they get more chips , at least to have more options for distribution later
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly"
by
Mitak
on 03/03/2016, 12:20:41 UTC
Well right now Kilo is pretty much the designated agent for getting chips. My conversation with Punin got as far as giving him some info to make out and send me an NDA around the end of January (which I never received) and then about two weeks later he dropped a line mostly to let me know he'd posted the 28nm info stuff. That's pretty much it.

I have 2 other people that are actually communicating with me and I will have the chips when they are released.  Wink
AFIK the chip is a fact. In some posts Punin wrote about  eng samples and the video part 1,2,3 in youtube are showing this.
But... when production run will be available and if they are going to sell small quantities or samples is another question .
I think that it is not only up to Punin and big USD will talk Wink
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 29/02/2016, 20:58:31 UTC
wow, chill
my comment was in answer  to the one before me.
I might not reading your BM based miner , but I'm reading this thread very carefully
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 29/02/2016, 17:05:00 UTC
Most probably yes.please excuse me.
So what is this with antminer refurb ?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Community Miner Design Discussion
by
Mitak
on 29/02/2016, 08:33:17 UTC
I do not think using Antminer boards as a host for Bitfury16 nm chips will work.
It is a tempting idea , but that is all just an interesting idea.
Be prepared for new board with new design etc...
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: New Miner X5 on BitFury 16nm chips
by
Mitak
on 29/02/2016, 08:29:59 UTC
You are not exactly right.
I do not know the details, but most probably the chips order from bit fury would take 2-3 months.
The risk that this integrator takes is big and they are trying to secure sales .
The thing is that the pre order market is over long ago back in 2013-14 and only integrator with good own or investors money can do the game
Post
Topic
Board Group buys
Re: Bitfury 16 nm chips and board design
by
Mitak
on 26/02/2016, 22:23:44 UTC
There were great times with a lot of projects targeted to DIY and home miners Cheesy