Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 86 results by MoonDusk
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 20/01/2015, 11:48:01 UTC
I really agree, I don't feel too confident in coinjoin schemes, or master nodes.  Zero knowledge is where its at.  The video left a bad taste in my mouth.  It gave the opinion of someone simply trying to sell their coin. He wouldn't even acknowledge the value of zero knowledge solutions. Instead it was his job to criticize any competition as best he can, and tell you don't look there, buy DRK instead.

When/if a usable zk solution is found some day and implemented, we can assess its value.

It's been found and implemented and you're looking at it. It's usable and easy-to-use. Ready for anon B2B. No need to take my word for it: the Zeuner Report will be in soon…


I believe search and implementation is still ongoing:

...we have said on a few occasions that we will only be utilising a basic nizkp until zk-snarks is fully out and trustless.

I'm afraid you failing to taking into account that ryno was referring to ZK-Snarks lack of ability to be setup in a trustless manner, not NIZKP (Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge Proofs) which is in use in ShadowSend v2 and is trustless.

Since that post by ryno the guys working on ZK-Snarks figured out a trustless setup which is promising if SDC decide to take this route in the future. Info here: https://twitter.com/SDLerner/status/548205708236566530

Just to clarify for you.

When/if a usable zk solution is found some day and implemented, we can assess its value.

A zero knowledge solution has been found, it is being assessed by a qualified auditor. Lets await the results.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 27/12/2014, 13:33:50 UTC
Some quotes from Ryno to refresh your minds :

Our scheme was never going to be perfect, and we have said on a few occasions that we will only be utilising a basic nizkp until zk-snarks is fully out and trustless.

The reason we opted for anonymous tokens, instead of direct anonymous outputs to ringsigs, is because we're building towards direction we're heading in. What we're striving for... Encrypted values, with perfect nizkps, proving all values of inputs are real, without revealing any information about where they come from.

We're looking at many things, like homomorphic encryption, snarks, etc...
http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/976
snarks are advancing, along with many other ideas... We are not for limiting ourselves, but for bettering our [collective] future




This implementation is the foundation with which to slot in snarks. It will, again, blow anything close to it away! Again... Buy Shadow, don't buy it. Its of no consequence, it is the leading anon project. Very few people are just not yet ready to openly accept it yet.

Good news regarding ZK-SNARKS - https://twitter.com/SDLerner/status/548205708236566530
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 27/12/2014, 02:00:46 UTC
SDC is only a few months old mate this is not the final product it will be improved and right now it's as good if not better then anything else out there, that being said please stop talking about monero this is the SDC thread and everyone of your posts mentions it, you made your point, there are similarity's but were not done and we have done more in 4 months then xmr have in like 6 months really they haven't done much at all apart from change there name it's really not that impressive i bought in at the start and have been watching them  all i see is promises and no delivery, here i see no promises only delivery, face it, there is almost no coin out there that has done what the SDC team did in 4 months, it's insulting comparing SDC to other coins, there just not even in the same league, xmr is bytecoin with less coins and smaller pre-mine apart from put an X in there name what have they actually done? and i mean delivered not promised or currently working on, delivered, this is why SDC is better in every way, sorry to carry on but this is the SDC thread, you should expect it.

I agree. The amount of coding hours the devs put into this in immense and the pretty each feature delivered was unique to the space. In 4 months we've seen PoS Lite (staking), the simply stunning HTML5 wallet, stealth addresses, mobile PoS Lite wallets which stake (iOs and Droid), encrypted chat, and now ShadowSend v2. That an impressive list.

Wider adoption beyond the people who lurk these boards comes with usability and function. With a decentralised marketplace coming soon built into the beautiful UI, along with cutting edge anonymity technology this is now a product with a very real function. Throw in mobile updates with the updated new UI and ShadowSend v2/decentralised marketplace and we have something incredibly special.

There are very other coins out there successfully progressing to innovate and have as impressive display of function as SDC. Make up your own minds but thats my 2c (or 2 Shadowshis)

Lets not even think about the i2p screenshot teaser until we get an official announcement but that is another thing to look forward to it seems Wink

EDIT: Actually lets think about it Grin here it is

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 26/12/2014, 20:16:04 UTC
I have a question about shadow-to-shadow transactions.

0) I own 0 shadow.

1) Person A sends me 1 shadow.

2) I then myself 1 shadow. (not sure if this step is needed).

3) I send A some of the shadow back, say 0.9.

Question: Is it possible for A using some offline techniques in the (far enough) future to tell this 0.9 shadow is mine with a high probability? Probably this depends on the number of transactions of the network and number of users. So if you answer this question feel free to go into this as well.

I know for instance that, as things are right now, with Monero this fails, i.e. person A can tell the money comes from me with a high probability.

Thank you.

Correct me if i'm wrong guys, this is what i've gauged from reading WP and slides of this brilliant system.

When you redeem Shadow token to SDC the Shadow is not destroyed but added to the pool of Shadow tokens. Say Bryan sends 1 SDC to Shadow and holds his Shadow in his stealth address, the 1 SDC is now destroyed. Phillip who is unrelated to Bryan decides to redeem 1 of his 100 Shadows to SDC, which would appear on the blockchain as a newly minted SDC. Clearly a Shadow-SDC transaction has happened but the token could have been redeemed by anyone holding Shadow. The 1 Shadow which Phillip used to redeem his 1 SDC stays in the network increasing the potential outputs.

Poor Bryan might be having fingers pointed at him if it wasnt for the stealth addresses/ringsig/Shadow token/SDC creation and destruction ensuring anonnymity.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 26/12/2014, 17:18:20 UTC
please make presentation or youtube vid..lm lost Roll Eyes

Supposedly there is one coming soon according to a few posts back.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 26/12/2014, 17:17:43 UTC

Cool. That is an option. But why not accept shadow and keep tx's as Shadow>Shadow?


Yeah thats an option also. But this system allows the best of both worlds. I think one of the aspects which makes ShadowSendv2 zero knowledge is that SDC is destroyed and new SDC is minted after being signed by ring sigs, so these tokens are like intermediaries for the creation of new SDC on the blockchain.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 26/12/2014, 17:01:44 UTC
So here's a way of keeping things anon in the Shadowverse. Correct me on any points.

1. Franklin has 8,000 SDC
2. Franklin creates a stealth address in his wallet and backs up his wallet again because he created a new addy.
3. Franklin sends 6,666SDC to his stealth addy. Now they are Shadow and have disappeared from the blockchain.
4. When Franklin goes shopping he simply spends some of his stash of 6,666 Shadow to pay for things from merchants who offer stealth addys too.

Done. Perfect anon?

Correct me if i'm wrong guys, this is my understanding of the zk system.

3. Franklin sends 6,666SDC to his stealth addy with the 'SDC - Shadow' option. Now they are Shadow and have disappeared been destroyed from the blockchain.
4. All Franklin has to do is select 'Shadow - SDC' as the send option and send to the merchants regular SDC address. The ring signatures remove the link between the tokens and the network mints new SDC for the merchant, which are fresh coins with no blockchain history. So no stealth addresses needed for the merchant.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 25/12/2014, 13:40:00 UTC
ShadowCash Christmas sale on at Bittrex Grin
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 & White Paper MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 22/12/2014, 01:05:32 UTC
a little over 300 blocks…



Those are the eyes of a man who has just witnessed the birth of zero knowledge transactions.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 & White Paper MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 19/12/2014, 11:49:09 UTC
Who ever dumped and hit my 22.5ksats order, thank you! Grin
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 (ZK Anon) & White Paper NOW AVAILABLE! ⋆⋆⋆
by
MoonDusk
on 16/12/2014, 14:18:23 UTC
Such big news deserves a new article, which can be found here.

Will try to do a more in-depth analysis later this week, assuming I can make sense of the technical stuff that's way above my pay grade... Smiley

Great article once again jdebunt!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 15/12/2014, 19:16:06 UTC
Homestretch fellas!

Keep it up! Im in vegas right now celebrating this event.



Red or black?

xD

Exciting times for sure!

Incredible how close together they build their tall buildings in Vegas. Enjoy yourself  Grin
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 13/12/2014, 13:49:07 UTC
I love the mobile wallet (released) and stealth addresses (released and open source) but have several questions:

1. All the marketing efforts seem similar to CLOAK (Cloaktalk vs. Shadowtalk, One Market vs Cloak Bay, similar websites and writing styles for press releases, etc). Is the marketing team for SDC the same as it was for CLOAK? (I know the dev team including Ryno and technovert is different).

2. While the current stealth address tech is open source (thanks!) the ZK release in beta is not. Is there a reason for this? It seems to me that by putting the beta code in GitHub, progress could be made faster and any potential problems before public release would be more likely to be found. While a whitepaper is great, the community needs to see actual (zero knowledge) code to make sure it works as designed and is safe.

Thanks in advance!

1. The marketing team is not the same as it was for CLOAK. Shadow have actually marketed the coin vastly different to the approach CLOAK took which was based on deadlines and a lot of hype. Shadow has survived all these months by letting the features they developed do the talking. In particular, ShadowChat encrypted chat, HTML5 PoS Lite wallet, stealth addresses and soon true anon in the form of zk transactions.

2. I'm not sure if the code will become open source straight away. The devs have put hundreds of coding hours into producing their zk implementation, if it was open straight away the tech will be copied into other coins pretty fast as happened with rynos stealth addresses. The code will likely be audited by someone reputable whilst closed, hopefully not too long after we will see open release. This seems a fair approach.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 12/12/2014, 17:17:02 UTC
Hey guys, I have a problem – some time ago, I bought SDC, moved it to my wallet and have been staking since then.

I'm on Windows now and have a slight issue that when I'm AFK for a long time, my OS goes to sleep but can't be woken up, so I have to hard restart it.
That happened just now and when I opened my wallet, I see that my wallet shows almost 6.400 SDC less than I should have (that never happened before).

My wallet is in sync, there are no outgoing transactions in my wallet and I'm kinda freaking out.
Can somebody tell me what happened or how to advance? You can imagine how unpleasant that is.

Are you running ShadowLite? I've had issues with transactions not syncing or showing up in lite mode. I always had to restart the program to show the transactions that came in.

Yes, I'm running lite with staking. Also encrypted (dunno if that helps).

It's not about not showing up some recent transactions, I had that balance for a pretty long time now..

Can anyone point me on how to repair the wallet? I've tried restarting it a few times already.

Check your wallet address in the blockchain explorer and see how many coins are sitting in the wallet. That should shed some more light.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 10/12/2014, 13:49:15 UTC
I dont undestand the merge mining
SDC isn't POS?

SDC is in PoS so mining has finished. However there is a SDC multipool if you want to mine and be paid out in SDC.  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 09/12/2014, 15:50:50 UTC
Sweet mary! SDC is the best Christmas present I could have ever asked for Grin
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 07/12/2014, 20:40:39 UTC
Nice, I love this project. Someone dump on me Grin
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 30/11/2014, 13:50:12 UTC
Guys, relax. There are those who want fast profits and want the devs to get the zk anon out as fast as possible in order for them to achieve this. The devs however want to deliver a stable and polished product and not a rushed attempt. For those who didn't take part in the first phase of zk public testing, it does work albeit a bit complex. The next phase of testnet will have a simplified experience allowing users to make the zk transactions a hecka easier.

I'm not sure if you guys noticed, but now that that 'whale' has exited and removed his sells only 5.15BTC is needed to 27000sats with 22.7BTC buy support to 14500sats.

If you've been watching Shadow from the start you'd have seen a lot of great tech built and the best to come is just around the corner, patience guys.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 27/11/2014, 12:45:28 UTC
For those 2 lazy to click the link



Thanks for this update.
Do you have any estimation of the next testnet?

It wont be very long. The main bulk of the work has been done in getting zero knowledge anon functioning and most of the bugs ironed out (these are the important parts). Now it's just down to making usability a bit easier. As far as I'm aware the next round of testing and fixing should be the last phase before the first release of ZK anonymity on the main network Wink

are u answering this question on behalf of SDCDev/dev team or just ur ideas?

what does it mean "it wont be very long"....for me 1 month is long, for someone else one week or a day

better we stopped using round words like soon, not long etc.

I'm not part of the dev team, just my thoughts from reading and speaking to community members. Only SDCDevs has an accurate answer. The problem with giving dates is that devs then need to meet those dates or face backlash, or release a rushed product. I think for this reason the Shadow team have always given loose dates for feature releases. Maybe ryno or co could chime in with a rough ETA.

It wont be very long though, in the sense of what we've seen built over the last few months compared to the tasks left for this zk-ring release.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SDC] Shadow | Zero Knowledge Anonymity Public Testnet Online! | PoS-SPV | HTML5
by
MoonDusk
on 27/11/2014, 12:15:58 UTC
For those 2 lazy to click the link



Thanks for this update.
Do you have any estimation of the next testnet?

It wont be very long. The main bulk of the work has been done in getting zero knowledge anon functioning and most of the bugs ironed out (these are the important parts). Now it's just down to making usability a bit easier. As far as I'm aware the next round of testing and fixing should be the last phase before the first release of ZK anonymity on the main network Wink