Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 118 results by Morbo
Может, есть какие бонусы для владельцев пулов?
бонус один и большой
если получится 51% процентов вычислительной мощности сети откусить
Bitcoin is decentralized. Bitcoin Wikis are not.
fossil is a decentralized version control system and has a built-in wiki. just saying
They have a whitelist system that only allows people to edit the wiki if they send a small amount of bitcoins to an address.
Which makes it a censored centralized system. The very opposite of what Bitcoin is supposed to be.
How would you like to magnify your wealth, influence, and prestige?
This isn't wisdom, this is elitism and ego fapping.
Quote
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
thank you very much, that's exactly what i did
THIS IS THAT NEW TOPIC and its purpose is to shed some light on a problem in this forum
Few of my posts expressing negative attitude towards reflink spam were deleted.
I've got system private messages looking like this:
The problem with these automated messages is that they don't even link back to the thread the deleted post belonged to, so it's not possible to quote the thread and the topic starter in abuse accusations, this isn't handy at all.
Apparently there are reflink spammers in this forum who abuse the feature of self-moderated topics to silently censor any criticism directed towards them. And this creates a very serious precedent. The lack of transparency in exposing these forum users makes the admins look like biased in favor of such slick people. Lack of very strict moderation rules is what made this forum highly popular, but lack of fairness and transparency that favors spammers with hidden agendas is what can bring this forum down. You don't want a full scale confrontation between spammers and those who dislike them to the point of being ready to burn the whole place just to eradicate the spamming defilers.
inb4 a new forum is being developed, it will have all features you need, just be patient. Please don't bring this argument, I don't believe in the whole BS about the new forum
I've got system private messages looking like this:
Quote
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
The problem with these automated messages is that they don't even link back to the thread the deleted post belonged to, so it's not possible to quote the thread and the topic starter in abuse accusations, this isn't handy at all.
Apparently there are reflink spammers in this forum who abuse the feature of self-moderated topics to silently censor any criticism directed towards them. And this creates a very serious precedent. The lack of transparency in exposing these forum users makes the admins look like biased in favor of such slick people. Lack of very strict moderation rules is what made this forum highly popular, but lack of fairness and transparency that favors spammers with hidden agendas is what can bring this forum down. You don't want a full scale confrontation between spammers and those who dislike them to the point of being ready to burn the whole place just to eradicate the spamming defilers.
inb4 a new forum is being developed, it will have all features you need, just be patient. Please don't bring this argument, I don't believe in the whole BS about the new forum
*** Stop bitching at the OP. It makes you look juvenile, and its embarrassing ***
If you'd spent two minutes researching this forum section instead of going ad hominem, you could notice that OP has made multiple garbage copypaste posts pointing to his site. The quality of content is horrible and he looks like yet another parasite who's trying to whore some free site clicks just because bitcoin is a buzzword now.
Andresen = Andrew son = Son of Andrew
Ibn! (c)
Can we have 90% of donations spent/donated soon to avoid future controversies?
im sure you could ask him
I'm scared, can you do it anonymous?
scared of what?
Khadafi and others, were about to start The African Union with the gold backed Dinar and the currency.
He also used to control the biggest underground plain water resource on Earth.
You expect him to run a secure forum for a multibillion dollar industry but spend not spend big bucks?
This is A Bitcoin forum, not THE Bitcoin forum.Anytime a complaint arises, there's someone who emphasizes that this is just a forum, not the forum. See the access over tor thread for example.
You expect him to run a secure forum for a multibillion dollar industry but spend not spend big bucks?
This is A Bitcoin forum, not THE Bitcoin forum.
