Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 29 results by Newminer2018
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 16/04/2019, 17:56:27 UTC
SINOVATE Infinity Nodes Public Testnet is continuing with full throttle. Keep joining in #🧪infinity-nodes-testnet  for collaboration and for finding bugs before the Mainnet!

Join Us: https://discord.gg/aygJnnX

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/552167734071263296/567747200013041664/Capture.PNG?width=1240&height=676


This has been a very exciting project. After much adjusting and fine tuning, I have finally got sinovate up and running. Once I copied my wallet to the SIN file, reboot and now have my wallet working. i just have one question. How do you get your infinity node to show up? Does it take away?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 15/04/2019, 22:46:28 UTC
Infinity Nodes Testnet is open for Public. Please download the windows wallet and join!

addnode=104.248.251.21
addnode=104.248.131.67
addnode=212.156.62.166

https[Suspicious link removed]


https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/494800139307712513/567466161336221706/launch.png   

So I downloaded the sinovate wallet, went into tools/open masternode configuration file and added the three nodes. Saved it as a config file and restarted the sinovate wallet. It has been idle for more than 1/2 an hour and not connecting. And ideas of what I either did wrong or missed.
Post
Topic
Re: Vertcoin - First Scrypt N | First Stealth Address - Privacy without mixer
by
Newminer2018
on 17/02/2019, 11:25:26 UTC
Quote
I have downloaded the latest Vertcoin Wallet and still getting this message. "This is a pre-release test build - use at your own risk - do not use for mining or merchant applications". What version of Vertcoin Core wallet should I be on?
Should be  v0.14.0.0-0f495ed.   You can download from here: https://github.com/vertcoin-project/vertcoin-core/releases

Many thanks, Have updated and all is good.
Post
Topic
Re: Vertcoin - First Scrypt N | First Stealth Address - Privacy without mixer
by
Newminer2018
on 15/02/2019, 11:20:02 UTC

I have downloaded the latest Vertcoin Wallet and still getting this message. "This is a pre-release test build - use at your own risk - do not use for mining or merchant applications". What version of Vertcoin Core wallet should I be on?
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 17/01/2019, 13:18:53 UTC

Top 25 rich list of raven is 41.39%  in 1 year with 15% of the total supply already in circulation.
https://explorer.ravencoin.world/richlist
 
SUQA top 25 is 13.91% in 4 months with 40% of the total supply in circulation.
http://suqaexplorer.com/richlist
 
Simple math to understand the future of SUQA!

Great information cryptotamer01. I had a look at my wallet and was hoping you could help me out.

SZq78drXVbrr8Exirp7x1DvxUAMc8he45D
Total Sent (SUQA)   Total Received (SUQA)   Balance (SUQA)
241991.46956091   348853.17658750   106861.70702659

I see that my balance is 106861.70702659 and I have been using the timelock since the start, can you explain how 241991.46 has been sent and the total received is 348853.17.

Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 07/01/2019, 13:41:32 UTC
For those who think that the developers are selling. Here is the 2 financial statements https://medium.com/@suqa/on-founders-fee-transparency-431a16550058and
https://medium.com/@suqa/suqa-monthly-financial-statement-december-2018-7004fbc6b268
And here is the developer funds wallet that was never spent,  not going to be spent and it will not be used in SIN nodes.

The developer fee will reduce from 9.08% to 1% SIN Hard-Fork Time Late March.
This is just for you to see how we are transparent and never sold any SUQA.
The top 25 wallet is decreased to 14.88% and the 30 days time-locked amounts are almost 60 million SUQA.
Future will be great for the patient ones because your team is working non-stop without even selling anything!
https://i.imgur.com/enrPmSQ.png
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team.
If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure.
The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork!

For 1 Year? ...

Earlier in the post, your team members state that it will NOT be used for SIN nodes, period!

Which is it?

#crysx
You don't want us to take advantage of the SIN nodes even after 1 year. I think we deserve to use our funds after all these hard work and the developer funds will also be spent for 1 year for running and maintaining SUQA and it will be much less after 1 year. We are also reducing the developer fee to 1% on hard fork-time.

That is fine then,  we will not use our funds for SIN never but it also shows the guarantee that the SIN nodes will be profitable after 1 year and more Wink

Don't make this as an attack - it isn't ...

I didn't say what you claimed, and I certainly am not against the team using the funds. You all well deserve it.

I AM saying that if you are going to post something, and become ambiguous about it, then it leads to confusion AND distrust in the team AND the project. Something I would not like to see with SUQA especially with Pallas on the team. So you will need to set in concrete (or at least change TO what you WILL do - regardless of outcome), which it is EXACTLY what you will do.

You are either using the funds for SIN nodes, or you are not.
You are either cashing some of the funds in to pay for certain areas of the development, or you are not.
You are either keeping the coins locked away, or you are not.

Which ever way you decide is best to move forward for the BENEFIT of the project, especially when the team needs to meet payments, then you should state it, plan it and follow through with it, even if there are changes made down the track.

In the previous posts, one of YOUR team members stated they will NOT use the funds for SIN nodes, then YOU post that you will but only after a year.

State what is going to happen, and agree with the WHOLE team what it should be THEN post what it will be. Even if it changes later in the year, at least at THIS time you ALL agree on what needs to be done, and there will be NO confusion that the community will experience because two team members can't agree on what should be said publicly or not. The community that you have worked so hard to build and the community that trust your word with what you do. Just be consistent, no matter what you do.

NOW do you understand what I am saying?

#crysx
You are right. There was a misunderstanding because i thought we could also benefit from SIN after 1 year. The problem of coins transforming to split systems from pow only is if the developers have most of the funds then they could use it for their nodes in the beginning get the most high ROI  and do whatever they want with them but after 1 year the developer funds will not win high ROI because of all the nodes will be full and the reward will be yearly around 30% give or take. Also the developer wallet after 1 year will not mean anything because there will be more richer wallets because of SIN while keeping low inflation but you are right first we said we will not use it means we will not use it. Sorry for the confusion.

To make everything clear. The developer funds will not be used in the SIN nodes never. They will be used just like how they are used right now. For development and continuous progress of the SUQA project. We will be providing the developer wallet under one wallet address so keeping track of it from the community will be easy.
They are divided to different addresses right now because they are time-locked but just after the hard-fork we will provide our 1 developer wallet address to be seen in the explorer as top wallet.

We will also keep releasing financial articles for monthly spendings to our community so like everytime, everything will be transparent.

Thanks

Many thanks for clearing this up. I am still very new to all of this and would appreciate if you can enlighten me on the future of SUQA.

I have been mining the coin since early October and been very happy with the team and the community.

The questions I have to help me understand the direction that SUQA is going are:

1. After the hard fork and the SIN nodes are available, you can use your SUQA to purchase a node. Is the node a device that you then share with other members depending on how much you spend with 100,000 coins being the minimum.

2. Will we still have the same wallet or will we have to upgrade to another wallet?

3. Will we be mining the SUQA coin as we are now after the hard fork?

4. Can we buy a node with our locked coins or do we need to use unlocked coins?

Many thanks.

Hello and thanks for the great support.
1. After the hard fork if you want to use the SIN nodes then you need to lock 100K minimum. You will need to setup a linux machine with a static ip or rent a vps for your nodes to be running.I think the VPS's are around 2.8 euro monthly. If you lock for Mid SIN for 500K or for Big SIN for 1 million, you will still only need 1 VPS or a linux machine with a static ip. You will have a private key that you can use from anywhere to setup your device but we suggest you to keep it running once it is setup to not lose any block rewards.
2. You will need to upgrade tot he brand new wallet but your current funds will be there just like before.
3.Yes you will be mining SUQA as you are now just after the hard-fork.
4. You can not use the locked coins but every 2 minutes from the blocks the nodes will pay you just like mining so if you are an early adopter you will get back your coins way early from the block rewards.

Thanks

cryptotamer01 Thank you very much answering my questions and now have a much better understanding as to how the SINs will work. Not really a Linux user so will just keep mining with the GPU's.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 07/01/2019, 12:43:12 UTC
For those who think that the developers are selling. Here is the 2 financial statements https://medium.com/@suqa/on-founders-fee-transparency-431a16550058and
https://medium.com/@suqa/suqa-monthly-financial-statement-december-2018-7004fbc6b268
And here is the developer funds wallet that was never spent,  not going to be spent and it will not be used in SIN nodes.

The developer fee will reduce from 9.08% to 1% SIN Hard-Fork Time Late March.
This is just for you to see how we are transparent and never sold any SUQA.
The top 25 wallet is decreased to 14.88% and the 30 days time-locked amounts are almost 60 million SUQA.
Future will be great for the patient ones because your team is working non-stop without even selling anything!
https://i.imgur.com/enrPmSQ.png
Great evidence to build up more trust on the SUQA team.
If coins in the fund sell at one time, they will put the SUQA price under massively pressure.
The developers funds will not be used for SIN nodes for 1 year and it will be used only for development purposes and spendingsd will be monthly from that wallet. Everybody can track of the wallet just after the hard fork time so there will be much more trust for the project. We are making the hardfork to be legal as non security and we want our members to win from the SIN nodes. We don't think for ourselves. SIN will be the most fair node system that is announced months before for people to get ready for this and the developer funds will not be used so it will be just for the majority of the SUQA believers which will create new riches in April after the hard-fork!

For 1 Year? ...

Earlier in the post, your team members state that it will NOT be used for SIN nodes, period!

Which is it?

#crysx
You don't want us to take advantage of the SIN nodes even after 1 year. I think we deserve to use our funds after all these hard work and the developer funds will also be spent for 1 year for running and maintaining SUQA and it will be much less after 1 year. We are also reducing the developer fee to 1% on hard fork-time.

That is fine then,  we will not use our funds for SIN never but it also shows the guarantee that the SIN nodes will be profitable after 1 year and more Wink

Don't make this as an attack - it isn't ...

I didn't say what you claimed, and I certainly am not against the team using the funds. You all well deserve it.

I AM saying that if you are going to post something, and become ambiguous about it, then it leads to confusion AND distrust in the team AND the project. Something I would not like to see with SUQA especially with Pallas on the team. So you will need to set in concrete (or at least change TO what you WILL do - regardless of outcome), which it is EXACTLY what you will do.

You are either using the funds for SIN nodes, or you are not.
You are either cashing some of the funds in to pay for certain areas of the development, or you are not.
You are either keeping the coins locked away, or you are not.

Which ever way you decide is best to move forward for the BENEFIT of the project, especially when the team needs to meet payments, then you should state it, plan it and follow through with it, even if there are changes made down the track.

In the previous posts, one of YOUR team members stated they will NOT use the funds for SIN nodes, then YOU post that you will but only after a year.

State what is going to happen, and agree with the WHOLE team what it should be THEN post what it will be. Even if it changes later in the year, at least at THIS time you ALL agree on what needs to be done, and there will be NO confusion that the community will experience because two team members can't agree on what should be said publicly or not. The community that you have worked so hard to build and the community that trust your word with what you do. Just be consistent, no matter what you do.

NOW do you understand what I am saying?

#crysx
You are right. There was a misunderstanding because i thought we could also benefit from SIN after 1 year. The problem of coins transforming to split systems from pow only is if the developers have most of the funds then they could use it for their nodes in the beginning get the most high ROI  and do whatever they want with them but after 1 year the developer funds will not win high ROI because of all the nodes will be full and the reward will be yearly around 30% give or take. Also the developer wallet after 1 year will not mean anything because there will be more richer wallets because of SIN while keeping low inflation but you are right first we said we will not use it means we will not use it. Sorry for the confusion.

To make everything clear. The developer funds will not be used in the SIN nodes never. They will be used just like how they are used right now. For development and continuous progress of the SUQA project. We will be providing the developer wallet under one wallet address so keeping track of it from the community will be easy.
They are divided to different addresses right now because they are time-locked but just after the hard-fork we will provide our 1 developer wallet address to be seen in the explorer as top wallet.

We will also keep releasing financial articles for monthly spendings to our community so like everytime, everything will be transparent.

Thanks

Many thanks for clearing this up. I am still very new to all of this and would appreciate if you can enlighten me on the future of SUQA.

I have been mining the coin since early October and been very happy with the team and the community.

The questions I have to help me understand the direction that SUQA is going are:

1. After the hard fork and the SIN nodes are available, you can use your SUQA to purchase a node. Is the node a device that you then share with other members depending on how much you spend with 100,000 coins being the minimum.

2. Will we still have the same wallet or will we have to upgrade to another wallet?

3. Will we be mining the SUQA coin as we are now after the hard fork?

4. Can we buy a node with our locked coins or do we need to use unlocked coins?

Many thanks.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 23/11/2018, 19:29:03 UTC
Recently CryptoDredge v0.11 has been released. Gives about 1-2% hashrate improvement of SUQA mining. Significant difference of power consumption is not found. The stability seems the same

Many thanks for letting us know. I have switched to the newer version and is working great.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 22/11/2018, 00:07:30 UTC
Are most holders of SUQA using time lock?   ya or nay.   


ya
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 21/11/2018, 14:19:13 UTC
What do you need to pay attention to when upgrading the old wallet to the latest version of wallet?

All you need to do is exit out of your wallet. Once it has completely shutdown, download the new wallet and unzip the files. Once complete, just click on the wallet icon and it will open with all your previous data as this is kept in the appdata directory.

Hope this helps
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 09/11/2018, 11:21:15 UTC

Hello all, I am running windows 10 and the CryptoDredge miner. I have gone into my setting and included the miner app in my "allow app through my firewall". What can I do to stop the virus software from always stopping the program even after I have restored it?

use t-rex 0.7.3)
Many thanks. will give it a go tonight.

t-rex is much slower.. why not take advantage of the best!
simply add and exclusion to your anti-virus for the folder of cryptodredge... its not a virus but AV's dont like it of course lol
as a matter of fact what i did is added an exclusion for a complete mining folder and i put everything there this way its a one time deal and whatever new version or other miners you add in there is excluded! easiest way IMO

I agree. Since using Cryptodredge, my hash rate increased by 20% on average. So far, I turned off real time protection and that seemed to work overnight. I will look at adding the folder of all miners to my anti-virus.

Many thanks.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 08/11/2018, 21:06:51 UTC

Hello all, I am running windows 10 and the CryptoDredge miner. I have gone into my setting and included the miner app in my "allow app through my firewall". What can I do to stop the virus software from always stopping the program even after I have restored it?

use t-rex 0.7.3)
Many thanks. will give it a go tonight.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 08/11/2018, 17:41:19 UTC

Hello all, I am running windows 10 and the CryptoDredge miner. I have gone into my setting and included the miner app in my "allow app through my firewall". What can I do to stop the virus software from always stopping the program even after I have restored it?
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 04/11/2018, 21:01:22 UTC
Millions in USD have been made from sold SUQA by miners getting cheap profits.  SUQA devs could have made millions by now if they wanted easy money but they haven't done that.  SUQA is following through on their plan.  SUQA has huge momentum:  1) Original algorithm, 2) Team dedicated to Bitcoin ideals (egalitarian and inclusive community), 3) CMC listed in just weeks which is extremely rare compared to many other coins, 4) Meaningful technical contributions (miners, wallet development, ecosystem development), 5) And a road map and plan that should support their ecosystem plans.

You just don't get to where SUQA is right now without having really good people skills which also means really good business skills.  The future is VERY bright with SUQA.

Very well said and looking forward to a great success for SUQA.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 04/11/2018, 15:02:03 UTC
Any good pool suggestions? Icemining is down on any stratum for me and beepool only recognizes 60Mh or 500Mh.
F2Pool? I dont like the 3% fee

 I use bsod (0.9% fee)
Can you tell me what your batch file is as my miners will and have not connected to BSOD and when I try to lookup the pool, i get cannot open page so thought it was down.


Code:
@echo off
:start
t-rex -a x22i -o stratum+tcp://eu.bsod.pw:2460 -u WALLETADDRESS.miner1 -p c=SUQA -i 20
goto start

Many thanks.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 04/11/2018, 13:22:53 UTC
Any good pool suggestions? Icemining is down on any stratum for me and beepool only recognizes 60Mh or 500Mh.
F2Pool? I dont like the 3% fee

 I use bsod (0.9% fee)
Can you tell me what your batch file is as my miners will and have not connected to BSOD and when I try to lookup the pool, i get cannot open page so thought it was down.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 01/11/2018, 11:56:43 UTC
Good Day all,

Can anyone give an update on the TheBSODPool. For the last few days, my miners stopped connecting to it and now the webpage has not been up since yesterday? Moved to icemining.ca and no problems just lower hashrate.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 30/10/2018, 17:33:32 UTC
To the Dev's,

I was wondering about the 25% apr for the first three months and wanted to know if you make a deposit, one day before the three month period is about to end and make the deposit for three months, will you still get the 25% apr as you locked in prior to the change to 5% apr.

Would appreciate any feed back.

I am mining this coin, with two 6 GPU rigs and two gaming computers with two GPU's in each. I read the posts on this site almost everyday and enjoy the wealth of information from the supports.

So far I have been very impressed with the Team and the direction of this coin.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 19/10/2018, 18:33:31 UTC
Dear developers, you can describe the main reasons for creating a mining project? I think a lot of people want know it!
Investors get 5% per annum just for keeping coins in the wallet. This allows you to maintain interest in the project and the fundamental growth of the coin

Tell me if I am wrong, but I believe that you earn the interest on the coins that you put in a deposit not the coins that are in your wallet. I have have been making a deposit everyday for the coins that I have mined the previous 24 hours.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
Newminer2018
on 17/10/2018, 22:55:30 UTC
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx

Haha, my account is maybe a newbie account, but I'm here registered longer than you and in cryptoworld for long time, I only dont need to comment everything like you and respond to attacks like yours. So calm down boy.

Boy? ...

This shows YOU as the professional you are. Longer than me? OK Smiley

You speak rubbish, yet claim fact, even though you prove nothing but your lack of experience in all you do. Boy - HA!

In layman terms, you prove nothing more than what you display. Luck is certainly not dealing you a good card here.

Have fun, and don't forget to respect pays dividends in more ways than you think.

#crysx
Very well said....