Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 466 results by Nexus9090
Re: [BLOCK] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 307 blocks solved!
Congratulations to miner bc1q~jr38 for solving the 307th solo block at solo.ckpool.org, with only 200TH!
-snip-
https://mempool.space/block/0000000000000000000180aab2a364d0baeddacf4048d0600065390a81651829
A miner of this size only has a 1 in ~36,000 chance of solving a block each day, or once every ~100 years!
-snip-
https://mempool.space/block/0000000000000000000180aab2a364d0baeddacf4048d0600065390a81651829
A miner of this size only has a 1 in ~36,000 chance of solving a block each day, or once every ~100 years!
Nice
congratulations Re: [∞ YH] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 305 blocks solved!
It's all about your network setup and why would you add such proxy in your setup? Of course it brings more to latency.
In Whatsminer settings there ain't things you can do to make latency better.
I aggregated with a power proxy. And I set the difficulty of each device to 262,000 without rejection. Is that okay?In Whatsminer settings there ain't things you can do to make latency better.
please help me
Anything you stick in the way of your miner and the pool will only ever increase latency it will never decrease it. I've no idea why you would put a proxy in the way, it makes no sense.
In terms of network infrastructure, your miner should ideally be connected directly by wire to your internet gateway/router equipment. Don't use WiFi or WiFi repeaters unless you've no other option.
After that you have zero control over the network infrastructure and the latency between you and the pool is just purely down to the physical route between your gateway and the pool server over the internet.
Are you using the best ckpool server for your location?
Quote
Configuration:
Miners in The Americas:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://solostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Europe and Africa region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://eusolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://eusolostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Oceania region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://ausolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://ausolostats.ckpool.org
Miners in The Americas:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://solostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Europe and Africa region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://eusolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://eusolostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Oceania region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://ausolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://ausolostats.ckpool.org
Ckpool code is available here: https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool
Yes, all very well. But why would you need to use it?
Just connect your miners directly to the pool.
Re: [∞ YH] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 305 blocks solved!
It's all about your network setup and why would you add such proxy in your setup? Of course it brings more to latency.
In Whatsminer settings there ain't things you can do to make latency better.
I aggregated with a power proxy. And I set the difficulty of each device to 262,000 without rejection. Is that okay?In Whatsminer settings there ain't things you can do to make latency better.
please help me
[/quote]
Anything you stick in the way of your miner and the pool will only ever increase latency it will never decrease it. I've no idea why you would put a proxy in the way, it makes no sense.
In terms of network infrastructure, your miner should ideally be connected directly by wire to your internet gateway/router equipment. Don't use WiFi or WiFi repeaters unless you've no other option.
After that you have zero control over the network infrastructure and the latency between you and the pool is just purely down to the physical route between your gateway and the pool server over the internet.
Are you using the best ckpool server for your location?
Quote
Configuration:
Miners in The Americas:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://solostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Europe and Africa region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://eusolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://eusolostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Oceania region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://ausolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://ausolostats.ckpool.org
Miners in The Americas:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://solostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Europe and Africa region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://eusolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://eusolostats.ckpool.org
Miners in Oceania region:
Point your miner to: stratum+tcp://ausolo.ckpool.org:3333
Graphical statistics can be found at http://ausolostats.ckpool.org
Quote
years of industry experience
Yet this is the first time you've posted here!?
Thanks but no thanks, there's just one too many "NEO" new pools popping up with no credibility and ZERO history.
Why would anyone trust their hard earned hash-rate to a noob pool?
What kind of USB hub are you running them from, does it have capacity to run 3 devices at the same time typically you need a USB hub that'll do 2.5-3Amps per port for the CompacF to run reliably.
See this table
I'm using the Gekkoscience 8 Port USB Hub 2.0, which successfully runs 3 sticks in the past.
I can't tell from the cgminer logging if the problem is with the sticks, usb hub, or configuration. This can be seen in my screenshots.
Try a different hub with just one stick at a time. I suspect your hub may be faulty.
here you can see the result in the output file
Thank you.
I think you must have a better heat-sink than is fitted on my BitAxe Gamma. My temps seem to be 5-10C more than yours.
Hello all,
for some bitaxe user here, maybe the tuning script is nice to know.
https://github.com/mrv777/Bitaxe-Hashrate-Benchmark/
you can auto tune the speed parameter to the best value.
Standard Usage
Run the benchmark tool by providing your Bitaxe's IP address:
python bitaxe_hashrate_benchmark.py <bitaxe_ip>
Optional parameters:
-v, --voltage: Initial voltage in mV (default: 1150)
-f, --frequency: Initial frequency in MHz (default: 500)
Example:
python bitaxe_hashrate_benchmark.py 192.168.2.29 -v 1175 -f 775
try it out, i moved my bitaxe gamma from 1.2 to 1.6 THs
Best regards,
Willi
for some bitaxe user here, maybe the tuning script is nice to know.
https://github.com/mrv777/Bitaxe-Hashrate-Benchmark/
you can auto tune the speed parameter to the best value.
Standard Usage
Run the benchmark tool by providing your Bitaxe's IP address:
python bitaxe_hashrate_benchmark.py <bitaxe_ip>
Optional parameters:
-v, --voltage: Initial voltage in mV (default: 1150)
-f, --frequency: Initial frequency in MHz (default: 500)
Example:
python bitaxe_hashrate_benchmark.py 192.168.2.29 -v 1175 -f 775
try it out, i moved my bitaxe gamma from 1.2 to 1.6 THs
Best regards,
Willi
Hi Willi,
What was the impact on the thermal performance by doing this?
I've noticed even small variation in the voltage and frequency can make a big difference to the temperatures
Re: [BLOCK] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 306 blocks solved!
Congratulations to massive new rental miner bc1q~4kzx for solving the 306th solo block at solo.ckpool.org!
https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000978f2aa548b12b9fe7da9e2809d25f2d40ddfb63c1ae
Code:
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.360] Possible block solve diff 475434506010404.812500 !
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.431] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] Solved and confirmed block 912632 by bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx.FH
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] User bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx:{"hashrate1m": "61.9P", "hashrate5m": "18.6P", "hashrate1hr": "1.71P", "hashrate1d": "155T", "hashrate7d": "472T", "shares": 2590244944463, "authorised": 1686335063}
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] Worker bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx.FH:{"hashrate1m": "61.9P", "hashrate5m": "18.6P", "hashrate1hr": "1.71P", "hashrate1d": "155T", "hashrate7d": "461T"}
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.448] Block solved after 147102310200318 shares at 113.4% diff
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.431] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] Solved and confirmed block 912632 by bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx.FH
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] User bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx:{"hashrate1m": "61.9P", "hashrate5m": "18.6P", "hashrate1hr": "1.71P", "hashrate1d": "155T", "hashrate7d": "472T", "shares": 2590244944463, "authorised": 1686335063}
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.434] Worker bc1qh63yugquzjvdd9qn3fwsd6asgfzlh7s8sv4kzx.FH:{"hashrate1m": "61.9P", "hashrate5m": "18.6P", "hashrate1hr": "1.71P", "hashrate1d": "155T", "hashrate7d": "461T"}
[2025-09-01 02:48:56.448] Block solved after 147102310200318 shares at 113.4% diff
https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000978f2aa548b12b9fe7da9e2809d25f2d40ddfb63c1ae
Congratulations again!
Getting quite regular this.
Good luck all.
Re: [∞ YH] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 305 blocks solved!
Hello everyone I have 15 m30++ 110th devices connected to the proxy. What number should I set the difficulty for each device?
It shouldn't matter as I believe the pool will adjust to suite your rate but if you need a default difficulty 2.5*GH/s is a good guide so around 275,000 for each @ 110TH/s.
I'm having trouble figuring out why my three sticks won't initialize and I've posted a few screenshots if someone could help.
My boot script has always worked before:
sudo ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 -u xxx -p x --suggest-diff 442 --gekko-compacf-freq 425 --gekko-mine2 --gekko-tune2 85 --gekko-start-freq 350
Thank you
My boot script has always worked before:
sudo ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 -u xxx -p x --suggest-diff 442 --gekko-compacf-freq 425 --gekko-mine2 --gekko-tune2 85 --gekko-start-freq 350
Thank you
What kind of USB hub are you running them from, does it have capacity to run 3 devices at the same time typically you need a USB hub that'll do 2.5-3Amps per port for the CompacF to run reliably.
See this table
Re: [∞ YH] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 305 blocks solved!
Hello ck,
the 4334 is not ok? I mean, it works.. I am finding shares..
Thanks.
Regards, Frank
the 4334 is not ok? I mean, it works.. I am finding shares..
Thanks.
Regards, Frank
As -CK said, you need to be on the other port 3333 for lower hash rate equipment 17TH/s will require a much lower difficulty to return shares regularly enough for a stable hash rate to be shown on the stats page.
Port 4334 is for high performance systems and rentals >1PH/s
Use port 3333 things will be better for you.
Re: [BLOCK] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 305 blocks solved!
Congratulations to miner bc1q~nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz with 9PH for solving the 305th solo block at solo.ckpool.org! A miner of this size has about a 1 in 800 chance of solving a block per day.
https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000d22167aa0c9d1a49e7878631d6c93ea1b1c87b98ba24
Code:
[2025-08-17 10:19:46.991] Possible block solve diff 342913087948669.125000 !
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.087] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] Solved and confirmed block 910440 by bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz.52BE1957C966
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] User bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz:{"hashrate1m": "9.18P", "hashrate5m": "9.16P", "hashrate1hr": "9.2P", "hashrate1d": "7.15P", "hashrate7d": "1.92P", "shares": 306446076609, "authorised": 1755277406}
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] Worker bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz.52BE1957C966:{"hashrate1m": "125T", "hashrate5m": "127T", "hashrate1hr": "111T", "hashrate1d": "85.7T", "hashrate7d": "23T"}
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.095] Block solved after 80320634207461 shares at 62.1% diff
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.087] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] Solved and confirmed block 910440 by bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz.52BE1957C966
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] User bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz:{"hashrate1m": "9.18P", "hashrate5m": "9.16P", "hashrate1hr": "9.2P", "hashrate1d": "7.15P", "hashrate7d": "1.92P", "shares": 306446076609, "authorised": 1755277406}
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.088] Worker bc1qhgfpg54q8u0qnq8cyzvtpwhzm7z4g0wk8hpq60nwsgdw0wfh4trqal69fz.52BE1957C966:{"hashrate1m": "125T", "hashrate5m": "127T", "hashrate1hr": "111T", "hashrate1d": "85.7T", "hashrate7d": "23T"}
[2025-08-17 10:19:47.095] Block solved after 80320634207461 shares at 62.1% diff
https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000000d22167aa0c9d1a49e7878631d6c93ea1b1c87b98ba24
Congrats to the miner and -ck another one for the win!
Mine on!!
Re: [∞ YH] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 304 blocks solved!
Hi -ck
Is eusolo.ckpool.org running OK at present, I've been unable to connect all morning.
Thanks
G.
All seems fine as far as I can see.Is eusolo.ckpool.org running OK at present, I've been unable to connect all morning.
Thanks
G.
Thanks, I've fixed it. Seems my FTTP router was having a bad day.
Re: [SOLO] Docker-based Bitcoin Full Node Mining Stack (Bitcoind + CKSolo + CKStats)
The same question could be asked of yourself, why did you bother making a docker for it?
that was easy: because no-one seems to have done an all-in-one-solution
Makes sense I guess.
TBH, I think we're in a minority running our own nodes and pools. Most people are happy to use pools provided by others.
I run some of my miners locally and the rest are chugging away split between CKPool and Briians. Been running for over a year on Solo now still no sign of a block though.
Re: [SOLO] Docker-based Bitcoin Full Node Mining Stack (Bitcoind + CKSolo + CKStats)
Been tinkering and added a front-end for my local CKPool
Live logs and stats
Live logs and stats
Any reason why you do no just use the standard CKStats? I did a docker (which is a bit heavy, as CKStats also needs PSQL) - https://github.com/magicdude4eva/btc-fullnode-stack/tree/main/ckstats
Yes, because I wanted to do it myself. You don't learn anything by just plugging other people's work onto things I admit there are areas of the chain where we're reliant on other peoples work for example the pool code and bitcoincore as well as CGminer. But at some point I'll probably tinker there too and make my own miner code.
Plus I found it interesting and engaging.
The same question could be asked of yourself, why did you bother making a docker for it?
Re: [SOLO] Docker-based Bitcoin Full Node Mining Stack (Bitcoind + CKSolo + CKStats)
Been tinkering and added a front-end for my local CKPool
Live logs and stats
I'll probably add graphing to it at some point but its good enough for now.
Live logs and stats
I'll probably add graphing to it at some point but its good enough for now.
Re: [SOLO] Docker-based Bitcoin Full Node Mining Stack (Bitcoind + CKSolo + CKStats)
I cracked the G-club last night - best share 1.94G so far on a NerdQAxe++ with my stack..
Congrats, the best I've done so far was 146G thats with a mix of workers BitAxe Gamma, Gekko Compac F and some boards of my own creation based on BM1397 and BM1366 running on CGMiner/Raspberry PI. In total around 7.2TH/s combined.
Re: [∞ YH] US/EU/AU solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 304 blocks solved!
Hi, I like this pool, but I have a simple question! Can 80TH find a block? By luck, for example? And has this ever happened? I want to know some of these things so I don't have to pay the energy cost for nothing.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes indeed, its a gamble but others have won blocks with lower hash rates than 80TH
According to solochance.com your odds are
Chance per block: 1 in 12,012,250
Chance per day: 1 in 83,418
Time estimate: 229 years
Significantly better odds than winning the lottery, but still a long shot nevertheless.
But, nothing ventured and all that!
Good luck...
