Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 428 results by Nikolaj
Re: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine
as simple as that, the volume will move to another exchange, yobit (Decent volumes btw, it could get easily double that amount in a short time, reaching cryptopia yesterday volumes)
It's possible to see higher prices due the bigger demand, and the absence of sell pressure due the internal incident of cryptopia.
It's possible to see higher prices due the bigger demand, and the absence of sell pressure due the internal incident of cryptopia.
Re: [ANN] Diamond (DMD) Evolution v 2.0 | Hybrid Security | 25% PoS
Hey Guys,
a question about the upcoming snapshot:
method 1 and 2 / am I able to do the same now (12 of sept)? Because it's wrote up the 10th
Need I just to secure the Wallet.dat, and swap it to the new chain?
We need 10k DMD to make a MN, right?
Thanks
a question about the upcoming snapshot:
method 1 and 2 / am I able to do the same now (12 of sept)? Because it's wrote up the 10th
Need I just to secure the Wallet.dat, and swap it to the new chain?
We need 10k DMD to make a MN, right?
Thanks
I suggest you have your private key as well, method 1, just in case. Later on you can import it to the new wallet which will be available on the 15th.
You can export your privatekey today if you want as well.
Yes, 10k per masternode, if less you can go for standard PoS.
Thanks for the suggestion
Re: [ANN] Diamond (DMD) Evolution v 2.0 | Hybrid Security | 25% PoS
Hey Guys,
a question about the upcoming snapshot:
method 1 and 2 / am I able to do the same now (12 of sept)? Because it's wrote up the 10th
Need I just to secure the Wallet.dat, and swap it to the new chain?
We need 10k DMD to make a MN, right?
Thanks
a question about the upcoming snapshot:
method 1 and 2 / am I able to do the same now (12 of sept)? Because it's wrote up the 10th
Need I just to secure the Wallet.dat, and swap it to the new chain?
We need 10k DMD to make a MN, right?
Thanks
Re: [ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine - Cryptopia
Coin launched on july 18th, 313 pages on bitcointalk, high profitability, good volumes, JUST 1 exchange and an halving incoming.
What else to say if not Must buy?
These aren't coins for the weak hands, and faint hearts.
Sell and leave, but don't regret later. Spreadcoin teaches.
What else to say if not Must buy?
These aren't coins for the weak hands, and faint hearts.
Sell and leave, but don't regret later. Spreadcoin teaches.
Is there any reason why they went x11 vs an asic resistant algo? And is there a chance coin algo may change before release or is it set as x11
Pretty hard to find any reason.
Someone could think for potential personal interest, with a proprietary X11 asic farm. Going for ASIC in 2017 it's not wise, give the market conditions.
I have yet to see arguments against X11 aside from "people will dump". Can anyone give a different argument as to how X11 / ASICs will have detrimental effects on the network?
"Getting raped by giant ASIC farms" isn't very persuasive. Though, it does bring about some humorous imagery.
"Getting raped by giant ASIC farms" isn't very persuasive. Though, it does bring about some humorous imagery.
it's about hashrate distribution, with asic, you have higher chance of a single guy contorling the network with gpu not so much
Precisely (Eth/Zcash distribution)
So is it confirmed X11?
If it is, good luck with your project because We move out.
Ethereum and Zcash adoption are two massive lessons of the way to proceed with the distribution process, not letting yourself get raped by giant X11 ASIC farms (that could have been made in the meantime prior the HLM release).
If it is, good luck with your project because We move out.
Ethereum and Zcash adoption are two massive lessons of the way to proceed with the distribution process, not letting yourself get raped by giant X11 ASIC farms (that could have been made in the meantime prior the HLM release).
Testmining with the new kernel is looking good. Will deploy tomorrow on 100++ rigs...
The code is infected with gpl..
With nicehash $$$ backing and the angry french dude, I don't think I will release it.. I am the best optimizer in the world.
ROFL The code is infected with gpl..
With nicehash $$$ backing and the angry french dude, I don't think I will release it.. I am the best optimizer in the world.
"best optimizer in the world" with fake 6% optimization.
do you want a medal or what ?
here it is "best fake optimization in the world"
At least you don't call yourself the most modest in the world...
Hahah.
Epic
Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | Decentralize Everything (decentralized blockexplorer coming)
There's more, a dedicated comunity (spreadtalk)
With the coming hlm swap and btc rising, we'll have a very interesting time ahead.
@georgem, how's it going mate?
With the coming hlm swap and btc rising, we'll have a very interesting time ahead.
@georgem, how's it going mate?
The decentralization is the key element to avoid the acquisition of dominance of a certain group in the initial stage; the issue is that you cannot avoid it, just put a delay on it.
It can be a long term feature, like the ICE-Age of Ethereum, or it could lead to an ASIC viability like any other crypto, but just remember that the "centralization"concept means also volume on a daily basis, and volume means market capitalization.
You cannot acquire success without having a third-party infrastructure backbone, and it's simply called market approval.
In my experience the ASIC technology it's unfortunately a wrong step, because it leads to an excess of centralization in the mining process (easy build-up of farms) and consequently a bigger issue related to 51% attacks (double spending).
A path with a CPU compatibility in the testnet, with a near-0 distribution with an early stage it would be fair, associated to a random distribution. Then, following the client's releases and patches, it could be scheduled a VGA startup phase, which would imply a near-immediate market approval, efficient step-up and distribution phase. Have a look at ZEC emission rate, and what brought to ZEC/BTC: it started with hype, and due the latter it vanished, like a leaf of ice in the desert.
Don't give so much importance to the algo, the emission plan it's one of the keys to the success of a coin.
It can be a long term feature, like the ICE-Age of Ethereum, or it could lead to an ASIC viability like any other crypto, but just remember that the "centralization"concept means also volume on a daily basis, and volume means market capitalization.
You cannot acquire success without having a third-party infrastructure backbone, and it's simply called market approval.
In my experience the ASIC technology it's unfortunately a wrong step, because it leads to an excess of centralization in the mining process (easy build-up of farms) and consequently a bigger issue related to 51% attacks (double spending).
A path with a CPU compatibility in the testnet, with a near-0 distribution with an early stage it would be fair, associated to a random distribution. Then, following the client's releases and patches, it could be scheduled a VGA startup phase, which would imply a near-immediate market approval, efficient step-up and distribution phase. Have a look at ZEC emission rate, and what brought to ZEC/BTC: it started with hype, and due the latter it vanished, like a leaf of ice in the desert.
Don't give so much importance to the algo, the emission plan it's one of the keys to the success of a coin.
The biggest issue I see with starting off with ASIC mining would be the illusion of centralized mining- as the ability to create the mining hardware would be in the hands of a central group. That argument would be fuel for many individuals.
If Helium reached an appropriate valuation, we could see the entry of larger and specialized ASIC companies into the scene. What's to stop them from developing a much more effective chip? The main strategy I see towards a decentralized mining network would be to deploy an algorithm that is memory intensive- or any specification that renders ASICs obsolete. An algorithm that is GPU friendly would be much more viable as it allows everyone in on the game from the start. The network would be truly decentralized, with no group with the "key" to mining in the beginning.
If you want to select an algorithm that is both GPU and ASIC friendly, X11 would definitely be viable. ASICs hashing X11 were released last year by small manufacturers, and the hardware is already spread amongst many miners.
If Helium reached an appropriate valuation, we could see the entry of larger and specialized ASIC companies into the scene. What's to stop them from developing a much more effective chip? The main strategy I see towards a decentralized mining network would be to deploy an algorithm that is memory intensive- or any specification that renders ASICs obsolete. An algorithm that is GPU friendly would be much more viable as it allows everyone in on the game from the start. The network would be truly decentralized, with no group with the "key" to mining in the beginning.
If you want to select an algorithm that is both GPU and ASIC friendly, X11 would definitely be viable. ASICs hashing X11 were released last year by small manufacturers, and the hardware is already spread amongst many miners.
A direct feed of ASIC from the developer of the coin has some pretty evident and potentially harmful consequences, like the devs centralization of hashing power.
It would be better eventually to adopt a solution like DGB as an example, which has an ASIC and VGA support on it's own, due the usage of different algos. Problem solved.