I just don't get all these scam claims of the XC crew!  Seems absolutely ridiculous to throw such claims at XC!!

I'm not invested in XC or BlockNet (or SuperNet) but watching it all. 
This statement should be recognized:
http://www.atcsecure.com/blog/Official_Statement.pdf

7 you say?


its a fucking joke.

edit: and that is a quote from spoetnik yesterday, sure there is more since then.

Why don't you ask Prometheus to prove that he is part of this? I bet he can't prove shit.
Any access to any github out there?

I don't think so...

No I very well do get the point, But the Blocknet official twitter account is claiming they are faked, others like you claim prom is just speaking BS.

The conversations are true, It'd be easy enough for "The blocknet" to just claim as you do that proms claims are BS rather than insist i faked skype conversations.

There is plenty of circumstantial evidence, plus you have to look at the way people reacted and answered certain things.

Though i do know there wasn't any prom/dan connection till August.

They met through Aero coin.

Either way you could have cold hard facts and in controvertible proof and still people will follow others blindly. Its just the nature of humans.

There is a ton of investment now in BLOCK and people trapped having bought the IPO. So of course they can't abandon it. They have to try and preserve some value.

Lol and now i Have negative trust for posting the logs to set the record straight. Just goes to show you eh.

I find it useful to keep reminding myself that the map is not the territory and the bitcointalk/github account is not the person.

Co-incidentally, I encountered some interesting relevant info, thought I'd write it up and share it with the discussants here ...

BlockNet is a straightforwardly-rebranded git clone of BitSwift. By “straightforwardly-rebranded”, I mean that, apart from some minimal changes to parameters, the rest of the changes are to the strings carrying the coin's name. This string replacement is often crude, fuzzily focused and inadequately constrained.

Fuzzy focus in BlockNet revealing BitSwift origin https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet/blob/master/COPYING#L1

The current construction of BlockNet's heritage trail as AGS, DRM, HACK is incomplete and should read BITSWIFT, AGS, DRM, HACK

As a cloneparent, BitSwift itself is a straightforwardly-rebranded git clone of AegisCoin, as revealed by the dog's breakfast that the AegisCoin dev has made of the original carsenk clone with s/DRM/AGS/g and which, like a treasured family heirloom, has been faithfully preserved all the way down to the BlockNet code:

Example of inadequate constraint inherited from inept ancestor dev https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet/blob/master/src/addrman.cpp#L9

AegisCoin itself is a clone of DreamCoin, a Carsen Keck device. The original carsenk github repo is long gone but I made a fork at the time and the code testifies that the Korean hackcoin dev (who, to give him his due, had successfully created a “best-of” coin which is still prized today) was justified in accusing Carsen Keck of crass ineptitude:

https://github.com/gjhiggins/dreamcoin/blob/master/COPYING

BlockNet, presented for ICO in Nov 2014, is basically a degraded copy of 6 month-old hackcoin and the identifiable descendants that populate the family tree have all turned out to be black sheep. Using this foul heritage as a foundational codebase for an ambitious project is an inexplicably odd choice for a reputedly savvy dev.

It may be that the choice of initial commit is irrelevant - some devs adopt the tactic of simply obliterating the original commit with a later monolithic commit or even ignoring the open source code entirely and pursuing a V2.0-binary-only release policy, spuriously argued as aimed at protecting IP.


Cheers

Graham

yea and he works for xc, fibre, nhz, librex, Util, Xcash, Apex and more! He's a collaborative dev and a freelancer. I did indeed pay Dan for some tech, as well as payed him for a code review... A code review SDC wanted as well. You try to shine this as if i'm some kind of villain. I don't deny that Dan has done some work on projects i've been a part of. I still don't see how any of this makes blocknet an elaborate scam.. It's a legitimate project and we will succeed.

You give me far too credit assuming i'm trying to deflect anything. I'm simply pointing out that you're acting like a desperate ignorant fudder. Your "evidence" as your refer to is nothing but modified statements of mine taken significantly out of context used to make a feeble attempt at proving your point, (this is getting old) a point which if falls on perhaps the weakest of minds and becomes accepted as fact pushes your agenda which is to FUD competing coins with the hopes that they will come to SDC (you stated this in IRC)

I've given my guys notice that I will be exiting SDC if it indeed comes to light that SDC team is in any way involved in this baseless, weak and pathetic attack on the project. I will be mercilessly exiting SDC.

I used to like SDC in fact, i'm currently (not for long) a large holder of the coin after speaking with smurf in regards to technology. The team seemed driven with an appetite for success so i picked up a good many early and even gave it a good run up in value. I've given my guys noticed and i'm awaiting their responses in regards to their current SDC holdings.

I suggest you have smurf contact me.

Pr0m3

Money making here I come!

Yea, break out your tin foil hats for this one guys... Look at those twitter DM's this guy can't even spell let alone make a point against what will be a ground breaking collaborative work utilizing many prominent devs.

These attacks orginate from the SDC community, some real class folks over there.

THE BTC FROM THE IPO HAS NOT LEFT THE EXCHANGES IT IS IN ESCROW AND IT WILL BE PLACED IN A MULTI SIG WALLET.