Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 63 results by Nootnewbie
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Not sure if anybody is interested in this, but I'd be willing to get a price set for my shares before trading starts. We can use an escrot service to transfer once trading begins again. Gauging interest for selling 10,000 of my shares for 12 BTC total. PM me if interested.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Is anyone going to sell for less than 0.0025 when crypto trade is up?
Crypto trade just made 2FA today, maybe as a response to actm being listed soon?
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
When Ken said that Activemining shipped the first products to customers, maybe he was meant to imply that Activemining itself was the first customer?
I'm open to using you as escrow. Have you provided this service a lot in the past?
I escrowed already more than 2,000BTC and ran a groupbuy for avalon chips where i had 4,816BTC in total in escrow.
@VE... im impressed how hard you work for cheap shares...
That's it?
gauging interest
Without any form of escrow, this can't work reliably. Talk is cheap.No reliable 3rd party escrow services?
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Lets say hypothetically that everything is sunshine and rainbows right now.
What exactly can Ken disclose? (Sorry, dont feel like wading through hundreds of pages)
What exactly can Ken disclose? (Sorry, dont feel like wading through hundreds of pages)
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
If each chip hashes at 16,000 Mhz, then I think that it may make sense that we're at low production. This would mean that we'd have approximately 1000 chips at this point right? That would seem more than just sample chips.
No. At the moment we have 1TH/s divide 16GH/s = 62 chips.
If we are at low-production then based on your 1000 chips we would be hashing at 16TH/s (Twice my estimate by the way)
So again no, we are hashing at perhaps 62 - 100 chips. And if that is the low-production run, then we are in trouble. I hope that is just the prototype.
Thanks for the clearup
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
If we were to make guesses as to where we were on the timeline, would we be at the "low volume chip production" phase right now? As in the extra hashing power we received recently was from low volume chip production as opposed to sample chips?
Whenever I bring this up I get called a FUDster or something.
I am sure we were meant to have the low-production run about 2 weeks ago now, having the prototype at the beginning of November. And no, the hashing power only adds up to 2TH/s MAX (it's a lot lower), that is 700GH/s from the old miners and around 1TH/s from the prototype.
I expect the low-production run to give us between 2TH/s and 8TH/s, this would bring in about 5 bitcoin per day.
So we are still barely hashing and are way behind. We are now entering December with half our hashpower still being Klondikes and Avalons.
If each chip hashes at 16,000 Mhz, then I think that it may make sense that we're at low production. This would mean that we'd have approximately 1000 chips at this point right? That would seem more than just sample chips.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
If we were to make guesses as to where we were on the timeline, would we be at the "low volume chip production" phase right now? As in the extra hashing power we received recently was from low volume chip production as opposed to sample chips?