@Slow Death
To answer your questions:
I am the founder of the project. I created the project idea about 20 years ago. I wrote the whitepaper, smart contracts, and the website for the most part.
There is no trading team, and there wont' be until we complete our ICO, and we have a physical location locked in place. If you were ever involved with a real startup company you would know there is almost no way to hire real members before the company starts up. It's not even economical to do so, and I am aware many companies do it, because they burn someone else's cash. History has showed me those startups will never survive. For more information read the whitepaper on our trading or ask here. There are no red flags. It's your opinion on how a team should run, nothing else.
@Arrrvin
That's a reasonable question to ask. At the very beginning when we started to write the paper, we had a business behind it, but had no clue about ICOs, or how to execute them. We asked around in Telegram channels for
ICO advisors and we found people that offered ICO services. Services from programming to ICO teams, marketing, etc. We took ICO team and programming (Airdrop, Website applications). Those were placeholders to us, knowing well we will upgrade them to our own members. If you were closer to the project, you would know we did eventually hire our own members for the team and started replacing those recommended members
who we had little contact with. From 6 we were down to 4 only. Anyone that could not KYC was being removed. Problem was our marketing bounty hunters and us, who submitted the team to many websites and it was a pain to remove them. We are still removing them.
Now, if you ever tried to run an ICO you would know all these ANN threads, and ICO teams are fake. There is about 6500 ICO Advisors on LinkedIn who probably have nothing to do with ICOs. Almost all ANN Threads are bumped for money. Our ANN, BOUNTY, AIRDROP thread did not have a single paid bump. That's why we had very little posts. Ironically, we are one of the most legit ICOs out there.
@Everyone
We did not have a problem with this thread. We made a mistake, you had the right to call us out. We admitted to it. What we have a problem with is false accusations, false assumptions, and false negative feedback.
If you made the thread about fake photos and submitted 1 negative feedback about fake photos, it would be justified, but instead you accused the ICO of being a scam without a single proof, you submitted multiple false negative feedbacks for the same thing, you made fake accusations about the rest of the team, and you (User marlboroza) submitted negative feedback to innocent people in our threads. Those people are innocent and have nothing to do anything. We do not have a single shill. Think about your actions next. Dont judge if you dont know.
More, since the witch hunt went full spree, we decided to Subpoena anyone making any kind of false accusations. You are allowed to talk about fake photos on our past team, or anything else you have proof for. We will litigate for anything else.