Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 68 results by ParrotyBit
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: BitForce: True Tales of the Bitcoin Police
by
ParrotyBit
on 16/10/2011, 21:50:32 UTC
(Last time on BitForce ^^^)

Later that night the Bitcoin FreePort was shot down over the Pacific. It spun in...there were no survivors.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Topic OP
BitForce: True Tales of the Bitcoin Police
by
ParrotyBit
on 16/10/2011, 21:49:58 UTC
On Unclipped Wings

It was hot. Damnably hot. Frank Crow glanced at his watch uneasily, out of habit. It was a useless gesture, he wouldn't be going home today, or any day, for that matter. No bars held him, no laws obstructed him, he was here of his own volition. "The greatest prison in the world is one's mind," he mused to himself.

There were others like him. Many others. Lured by the promises of a ticket to the great seastead of Libertalia, they had come to the FreePort. Long ago, people would hitch their fortunes to a boat and sail off towards the great rigs. Unfortunately, the surrounding waters had become quite dangerous due to piracy from both outside and inside Libertalia. In fact, all communication from Libertalia suggested that it was better to arrive without a boat. Truly, the best way to enter Libertalia was with an open mind and sturdy body unburdened by worldly possessions. Of course, such a thing could easily be achieved with air travel!

Unfortunately, the corrupt powers that ruled this great nation forbade air travel to Libertalia! It was only natural that they, the opponents of freedom, would exert their influence over the aerospace industry in order to prevent their slaves from escaping. But there was a way out! Hidden on the outskirts of Nuevo New Los Angeles Primavera was the FreePort of Bitcoin--an airport whose sole purpose was to ferry the desperate to Libertalia. No normal pilot could evade the gangs of roving lupine air pirates that surrounded Libertalia. It took a Captain of skill, courage, and a little bit of luck to reach the airdrop point, and the corrupt laws of this country would only impede them. No slavedriver would clip the wings of these birds!

And so, hundreds of would-be-pilots arrived at the FreePort every morning. Frank had seen them all: some completely blind, some missing arms, and others covered in burns from head to toe. Their planes would often be rusted or missing windows. Instinctually, he'd warn passengers who wanted to charter a flight about these obvious problems. It wasn't his job, it was something you'd expect anyone to do for another! There were others who shared his passion; a man in a business suit with a badge, and a giant brightly colored tropical bird.

A young man, no older than 20, walked by Frank shouting for passengers. "Who are you? Do you even have a plane? You remind me of that Rando fellow!" asked Frank.

"Just let him go, Frank! He ain't done you no wrong. Give him a chance instead of giving him the third degree. Stop pretending to be the Bitcoin Police!"

Frank sighed. There was nothing he could do anyway. An elderly couple followed the pilot through the gates to the runway. In the blink of an eye the "pilot" had taken their money and their lives. He had seen this scene hundreds of times, every time as painful as the first. The actors might have been different, but the plot was always the same.

The lights flickered just a little. It was no secret that the Bitcoin FreePort was in disrepair. Their only income came from people paying to enter the FreePort, though fewer and fewer people were entering each day. One of the most entertaining pilots, Rando Fatt, had left in a hurry the previous night, and everyone was in a sour mood as a result. Rando's schtick was mostly harmless. He'd fill his plane up with passengers and sit on the tarmac for hours. Everyone in the airport would laugh at him and his clients until he kicked everyone out of his plane and locked the door behind him. His clients would go home, never to return, and he'd walk right back in the gates with a shoddy new disguise. Kind of like a libertarian Team Rocket, with slightly worse plans.

The businessman, Watt, turned to the parrot. "Hey man, want to watch some kung-fu movies on my phone?"

"Gently caress you, I'm female and there aren't any crackers left in the poo poo vending machine. I'm out. Toxx me on it."

The parrot flew off into the sunset, on unclipped wings.

(To be continued)
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Buying Bitcoin Through Google Checkout
by
ParrotyBit
on 16/10/2011, 19:18:03 UTC
Would it hurt to start with an explanation of why people are cautious ( if not downright fearful ) of new ventures based on past scams etc.? 

Great idea, go make a thread about scams in the newbie forums and request a sticky for it. Maybe call it "Trust No One". Anyone whitelisted should be assumed to know the rules already.

Oh wait...
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Win Free Jewlery Gift Certificates Just for Voting in the Mining Rig Contest!
by
ParrotyBit
on 16/10/2011, 18:58:03 UTC
I'd vote but I keep getting confused by all the shoes! They sort of subvert the traditional advancement, you know. Adidas and all that.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Buying Bitcoin Through Google Checkout
by
ParrotyBit
on 16/10/2011, 18:08:37 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Monopolies: The mistake I keep seeing here (or just ignorance)
by
ParrotyBit
on 13/10/2011, 19:11:43 UTC
If a company has a monopoly on oil, people can substitute by switching to natural gas, ethanol, or electric.

We've got more than 6 billion people on the planet and no one has destroyed the oil monopoly yet. Odds are we'll all be dead before it's broken. It's not the government keeping down the electric car, it's the "free market" producing products that fit right into oil's plan. Demand for plastics aren't disappearing anytime soon, and hybrids killed electric cars off.

"The man with the visible hand" isn't trying to stop clean energy sources from gaining a foothold. There was no guy who made a car that got 120 MPG but got hushed up by the government. Clean energy gets you a tax break the oil monopolies don't get, and polluters have to buy carbon credits. Ethanol? Weren't some free-marketers complaining about corn subsidies earlier? As for natural gas, I'm fairly sure you know exactly which companies have the infrastructure to extract and transport it better than any others. Gasoline is heavily taxed, and even required to go through additional purification processes to be used in our vehicles. Despite what some people believe, there's no magic magnetic source of energy waiting for an angelic BTC investor to pick it up. I'd hate to see how poorly these substitutes would do without the massive assistance they're getting from the government as they are now.

In a real free market, the oil monopoly would end when they ran out of oil or kill off all ocean life (and the rest of the world) with another BP leak they can't stop (Where's the free market obligation for them to stop the leak anyway? The consumers haven't punished BP at all, only the government has).

I'd say the biggest mistake/ignorance I see here is people assuming the "free market" is a giant reset button. This isn't like starting a new game of Civilization or playing EVE on a clean server. The same people who own all the land/wealth/means of production now will own all the land/wealth/means of production even if every single government was abolished this second. I'm sure you'd want to call a "do over" and let everyone grab what they wanted (and your free-market children would ask for exactly the same thing), but that's not happening. You'd still be the 99% with 1%, and they'd still be the 1% with 99%. 100 years from now, they'd be the 1% with 99.9%. I'm sure everyone here thinks they've got the skills, expertise, or talent to be in that 1%, but I'd say about...1% of you are right about that.

Incidentally, placing 24th out of 26 isn't being in the top 1%. It's not the top 50% either.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: I want to teach you how to make money. [Sticky Please]
by
ParrotyBit
on 12/10/2011, 23:34:01 UTC
Check out my failsafe way to win at roulette by owning the wheel!
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Bitcoin got me some action...
by
ParrotyBit
on 12/10/2011, 21:27:47 UTC
Soooo, bringing it full circle, we go on a really epic hike and I end up railing this beautiful blonde stockbroker on top of a waterfall in the Sierras. Bam.

Those are the San Gabriel Mountains, the Sierras are a ways off!

I actually had no idea people went panning anywhere near there, I live right off Azusa, and I've been driving halfway to San Diego instead.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 20:50:11 UTC
He'll be happier because he'll actually have other reasons to live besides shaping ground beef?

Meanwhile Mr. or Ms. 16 hours bides their time, saving and scrimping every cent. Eventually, robots are produced to flip burgers automatically. The grasshopper dies, the ant lives.

Meanwhile Mr. or Ms. 16 hours bides their time, saving and scrimping every cent. They grow envious of 8's happiness and decide to buy a weapon with the money they've saved. No one stops them. The grasshopper dies, the ant lives.

Meanwhile Mr. or Ms. 16 hours bides their time, saving and scrimping every cent. 16 saves up enough money to be able to procure some means of production, and forms a burger company. BurgerB takes enough customers away from BurgerA so that the grasshopper gets laid off. The grasshopper dies, the ant lives.

Yeah, I know, in some versions of the story the ant lets the grasshopper in and he learns his lesson and everyone is happy. Not this one. There's always going to be some jerk red ant acting purely to gain control of the market and/or situation, and the regulations on the market should be at most to keep these red ants' actions within reason, and at least a safety net for the grasshopper to not starve through a winter. I won't debate at all whether current governments meet these requirements, as I don't believe they do. However, a truly free market won't meet either.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 20:36:19 UTC
Also painting/drawing, writing music or books, writing software/apps, blogging, cooking, racing cars, taking photos, traveling and writing guides, and having sex. All activities that people derive pleasure from that others happily pay them to help them continue to derive pleasure from it.

Cool, I want to race cars (not really, but anyway)! Where's my race car? Where's my piano to learn? My camera? My travel costs?

You aren't really going to give me any of those for free, are you... Furs are so cruel to their feathered friends!

Most people who do these things, aside from possibly writing software, don't get a cent for it. Even the 1% of them who do get paid for it have invested heavily beforehand in it with...the accumulation of resources, whether theirs or their parents'.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 20:03:56 UTC
Also, you don't actually lose anything every time you don't work. You can still produce enough value in short bursts to sustain yourself easily for the rest of your life. Considering flipping burgers isn't a scarce nor very valuable skill, yes, you will be working full-time for quite awhile before you can make your skills more valuable per hour.

Someone who works 8 hours a day flipping burgers has an advantage over the person who works 16 hours a day flipping burgers because
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 20:00:10 UTC
Here's your problem: You think caring for people involves one person sacrificing and the other gaining. In an ideal world, it's symbiotic. You can care for people and be profitable. Nobody has to sacrifice.

I'm going to pay for hospitals with good intentions and gumption!
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 19:55:12 UTC
Personal relationships. Socializing and sharing your life with your fellow man. Existing, thinking and sharing your thoughts with others can be an equitable exchange. There's more to life than eating, shitting and sleeping. Other people kind of give meaning to life in the end.

Don't we all look forward to just lounging with our families and friends at the end of the day?

We get less time to do that when our means of sustaining ourselves become horribly inefficient.

Lounging with our families and friends at the end of the day requires the accumulation of resources. Your friends, how do they get to your residence? Why do they have extra time at the end of the day? When did you make these friends?

Every second you aren't working is paid for by the time you worked. Those with more resources have more free time.

As for my last statement, it should make anyone want to vomit, but it's the sad truth.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 19:51:33 UTC
"Oh, Immanuel, people don't care. Only the government does! That's why we should give all our labor and money to them! We aren't smart enough nor caring enough to manage our own resources!"

The people who do care would have spent their resources on caring for others, losing their edge in profitability and sustainability. The people who don't care saved all their money and have more financial leverage as a result.

No matter what, the world is going to be screwed up unless more than 50% of the people are inherently good and under a democratically ruled, socialistic regime, or a truly benevolent individual with superpowers creates a magnificent dictatorship. Since neither of those are going to happen, I'd favor the least painful alternative.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 19:44:33 UTC
That's a funny straw man used against libertarians: that a person's only desire in life should be the accumulation of resources. I've never heard anyone argue that.

Aside from those who derive pleasure from their work, what desires can be fulfilled without the accumulation of resources?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 19:09:47 UTC
If the person voluntarily agreed to be bound by X terms, and X terms are followed, then there is no moral problem.

However, the practice of bonding a child to the debts/obligations of a parent is morally wrong, and such a contract is not valid. In the US, we call this phenomenon Social Security.

So who feeds the child born to two parents in debt?

Hey, debt can be transferred, right? Cool. Old guy, you're about to die, so take my debt for me? Kthx.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 18:53:12 UTC
There's bigger men and powers than some rinky-dink CEO.

CEO Mubarak is a bigger man than you!

But his company going under new management and forced merger of Tibet by China are only part of the free market of the world.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 18:45:25 UTC
States don't compete nor truly fail in our current environment. They are constantly bailed out and subsidized by the centralized banking entities. There is no true sovereignty at the moment and that's the problem. The people control the money control us.

You sure about that? Because not too long ago, I heard some workers revolted, got rid of their CEO, and found a new one.

Now if you don't mind, I'm going to go listen to Bohemian Rhapsody while making some Free Tibet signs.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 18:36:58 UTC
That there is no competition or a companies ability to fail. If you get paid regardless of what you turn out, you're not a business. You're a government.

States do compete, and states do fail. It's called war, and it's the competition between force to get more land. Try again, though.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 0.1% guys hold 50% Bitcoins, that's too CENTRALIZED!
by
ParrotyBit
on 11/10/2011, 18:29:46 UTC
If you're not bringing value, you're stealing. Theft can only be enabled by force. Effective force in our current world is limited to the state.

Consider states mega-corporations with a monopoly on land and force. Their "laws" are company policy. What makes the world different from a free-market economy?