Just wanted to tell I tried to change to 100% donation. It only worked with 9.99 >_<
Bye guys! might have a look here when PPS .. right now ABC is pretty sweet! less then 0.5 rejected. Inaba you should check what they do to keep it so low. Here i had about 3~4% Rejected shares.
They modify their getwork server to report less rejects/stales. There's no mystery there. I can do the same here if it'll make you feel better, though. I can, in fact, using their methods, give you 0 rejects.
They have the same reject rate as here, they just don't report it to you, so you will never know if you are having a problem or not and therefore causing a detriment to the pool as a whole. On an individual level, it's not a big deal, but when you start getting a lot of miners, and if everyone has absolutely no idea if there's a problem, it can add up to a significant drain on the pools true hashing power (vs reported hashing power). Unless they've done some mathematical gymnastics with stat reporting, their true hashrate is 1.5 - 3.5% lower than their reported hash rate. That means you are losing out on 1.5 - 3.5% of your potential income vs variance when you make a decision to mine at a given pool. (That is not to say your overall income is materially affected, only your decision making ability to assess whether one pool is better than another. Although, if enough people have unreported problems it will also affect your overall income as well. But you'll never know unless people self report a lower than expected income.)
They bill this as a "feature," and in so far as they pay you on stale shares it is definitely a bonus, but in reality it's basically dishonest math when measured against the accepted standard. I've not found anywhere that they confirm or deny that they report stats based on stale shares as well.
So I wanted to see what you guys have to say in your defense?
Just wanted to tell I tried to change to 100% donation. It only worked with 9.99 >_<
Bye guys! might have a look here when PPS .. right now ABC is pretty sweet! less then 0.5 rejected. Inaba you should check what they do to keep it so low. Here i had about 3~4% Rejected shares.
This is my last block.. it's only going to be ~.18 (before ~.3) don't see the point in continuing with it .. Sorry guys.. Thanks for a nice pool. Just not worth it no more..
What I meant was that if there would be a pin security password it would work like how you use a credit-card.. type the wrong pin 3 times and it swallows your card.. here it would lock your account.. then mail you or send backup stuff to your mail and phone..
still your system with sending a one time code by sms or email sounds nice too.. It was just something i saw at ABCPool.co
naw >_< my worker was down for a while, while the block was found.. earnings only 0.22713856 instead of 0.3 ;P bad worker! -6.62% vs prop
@Inaba I was thinking about adding a 4 key pin needed to be given when saving changes. If wrong 3 times it locks account and mails you. Just incase some one tries and hacks your account or something ;P I donno.. getting a little paranoid with this block so well hidden/locked..
More users joining .. making me earn 16.6% less.. I do hope the extra speed added will make up for it in time it takes to solve blocks.. Do we have an acceleration increase graph I could look at? Speed vs time over amount of shares per hour?