Что-то сайт у вас странно работает: нельзя выбрать валюту (т.е. вроде как работает только на продажу биткоинов, судя по курсу), и вообще индикатора валют нету. Пройти дальше ввода сумм тоже нельзя - кнопка "Продолжить" ничего не делает. "Резервы на кошельке", "Резервы наличными", "Резервы Visa/Mastercard" непонятно что означают и зачем показаны.

И отзывы у вас на сайте все старые, ещё с 2019 года. Да и тут в теме что-то пустенько.

For the sake of completeness, I've just got a reply from Xapo support (after 5 days).

Seems like it's time to move Xapo to another category. Their support seems dead. I experienced it myself and there is more evidence in their thread here.

You guys appear to be very professional. I like how you handle issues and present information. One of the few threads on Bitcointalk that I genuinely enjoy reading. Keep it up!

P.S. The other quite professional service I'd name is Poloniex. I wonder if you could find it interesting to cooperate with them. Must be sick combination of altcoins and traditional markets trading.

Even though this method of counting waves is somewhat uncommon, I guess many could find it useful to get an idea of what Bitcoin is really doing (courtesy of too-bad).

If you want uber-trollangle this might be the one. But I seriously doubt it. This is more just for fun count.

I think there are not enough subwaves in your 1. It is possible to force it but then 4th subwave is very much shorter than 2nd. Can you show how would you subdivide it?
Also there are so clear divergences between my ((iii)) and ((v)) which I can't ignore (EWO, RSI, daily CMO, volume and bid/ask volume ratio). Even though ((v)) is extended.

In bullish scenario wave 2 should be much longer in time IMO. The target shown is 0.618-1 time of wave 1:



Closer look:



Beware that most wave targets here are not aligned to fibos and put intuitively only.

I haven't drawn bearish (red) count yet. It supposes nested 1-2's here, but I'm not sure it would play out.

Countdown it seems to be.

Hi eboard10.
Even more that: Frost & Prechter in their "Elliott Wave Principle" book say that second waves are never triangles. They appear only in 4ths or Bs. This is why I put (A) wave there, so that (B) is triangle in this scenario.
If we consider alternative count where there is (1) instead of (A), then we must be in the beginning of C of (2) now:



This is my second favourite count. However the beginning of this C looks very weak. It might be that we're having nested 1-2's, but counting C subwaves as motive is nearly impossible. Moreover, C being >0.618 of A in this scenario would lead to breaking 20 weeks and 100 days SMAs, as well as daily upper BB. We've been below W20 for ten months already, so breaking it on wave C of such small degree seems very unlikely.

Thanks h3

@phoenix1. Regarding C breakout. Yeah, that's an interesting question. Especially considering our latest struggle to break 50 and 20 days SMA's. Though we saw enough excitement on waves up even during last months. So it may get enough power to break those. Would be more interesting to watch what would happen at daily upper BB edge which currently drifts along with 20 weeks SMA and 100 day SMA (it also coincides with 0.618 projection):

I'd like to say thanks to all the contributors and share one of my counts which I lately see as most probable. Sorry for any inconvenience that may be caused by =x= and -x- style of wave markings. I use those because I truly believe that wave degrees should be unique from sub-micro to Cycle level to easily distinguish them. =x= is a subwave of x, -x- is a subwave of =x=.

Don't want to put much text here but you can be sure that all of the smaller degree waves were carefully counted too.


So, mid-term, it seems to me like long triangle (or maybe flat).




Last month. (iv) and (i) of ((a)) of B don't overlap as it may be seen.




Red count corresponds to the blue one in the above charts.




Orange is alternative to red which doesn't change overall picture.


Daily may end up like this:


The triangle could resolve both ways actually, so don't take downside as granted. I simply think it's more likely.

Thick red line above is log TL since ATH. May not be positioned exactly as SC doesn't like log lines.
Open for discussion and criticism.

Do we have to explicitly request NRS conversion or having old wallet would do?

You should be the one to start 

Yeah, that's not a rule, but I can hardly remember any second waves retracing less than 50% so I'd expect this one to get at least a bit closer there.

Shouldn't ii (we're currently in) retrace at least 50% of previous i, which happens to be at 269.83 (1663 on Huobi), and which is only possible if subwave b is finished?

If you are a long-term investor (that will hold for 4 or more years) it is safe for you to buy all the way down.

I would say that 2014 chart is incomplete.

And you will always have different counts possible which lead to diametrically opposite resolutions. So it's mostly about probabilities.

Hm, don't treat everyone by few examples.
Also the statement could be true for almost any human.