Search content
Sort by
Showing 13 of 13 results by Qulian
Sure! Everything is a "perfect demonstration" of whatever ognasty or you say 
I just posted something obvious so I really don't need "everyone listen to" me. People can read.
You both should try and come back to the real world instead of convincing each other there's a conspiracy against "the 2 only remaining successful users here". You just embarrass yourselves.
I just posted something obvious so I really don't need "everyone listen to" me. People can read.
You both should try and come back to the real world instead of convincing each other there's a conspiracy against "the 2 only remaining successful users here". You just embarrass yourselves.
Man, that obvious sock puppet is totes making me feel marginalized right now. You know what is embarrassing? Nutless little turds like you who can't even stand by their own words so they need to use socks.
What an overwhelming (and original) reasoning
I think if he was around hed be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated. Hence why were becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.My point exactly.
Yes, everyone listen to the obvious sock puppet of another member here without the balls to speak using their main username. This is a perfect demonstration of what he was talking about. People who operate openly and rank up in this system via time and effort are inherently targets of those who manipulate these systems for their own gain. The decent people doing things the right way then have their overt operations and effort used as leverage against them, while the abusers operate in the dark to increase their own control by displacing them. This is again why I advocate for a standard of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws before leaving negative ratings, because without objective substantiation the trust system simply becomes a tool of extortion of the few people left trying to do it the right way.
Sure! Everything is a "perfect demonstration" of whatever ognasty or you say
I just posted something obvious so I really don't need "everyone listen to" me. People can read.
You both should try and come back to the real world instead of convincing each other there's a conspiracy against "the 2 only remaining successful users here". You just embarrass yourselves.
⭐ Merited by Lauda (1)
I think if he was around hed be blamed for people losing money in free markets, called a scammer for his holdings, and would be a target for jealous individuals who were unhappy with their own lives. Pretty much the same way every other successful long term member here is treated. Hence why were becoming more and more rare.
Your username really should be eGONasty.My point exactly.
Perhaps this has something to do with the fact that he is an extortionist and a scammer and is harmful to the community and marketplace. Maybe theymos is using some kind of AI to detect this.
Yes! Maybe. And the AI decided to let her leave trust but not receive it. Lauda's Trust summary doesn't load anymore. Did sending trust 4439 times and receiving an unknown number or feedbacks tricker a time out somewhere?
Maybe it occurred because of limitations imposed by theymos?
OK, new limits:
- You can't give more than 5 ratings to a single user.
- Your total sent ratings is limited to three times your activity, but at least 1.
- The comment length is limited to 600 characters, but each newline counts as 120 characters.
- You can't give more than 5 ratings to a single user.
- Your total sent ratings is limited to three times your activity, but at least 1.
- The comment length is limited to 600 characters, but each newline counts as 120 characters.
Isn't this forum going away? Why so many feature requests for this ancient hunk of SMF?? 
You're right. After all, the forum will switch to the software in one or two decades. Re: [scenarios] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
OP, you should make a scenario exactly like ch4 but adding that anyone who adds negative or neutral trust to cryptohunter is automatically excluded. I think that is what he wants and would make automagically remove colluders according to him.
AFAIK if a scammer reaches DT1 then other DT1 users can exclude that scammer and he would be off DT1. No need to exclude everyone who included him.
If the scammer is on DT2 then he will be off DT2 when more DT1 users exclude him than those who include him.
If the scammer is on DT2 then he will be off DT2 when more DT1 users exclude him than those who include him.
Hence why I tagged them and reported the post for deletion. Good thing I didnt wait until they successfully scammed and a post was made in the scam accusation section.
If I am looking correctly, this is first account OG has tagged for spreading malware since 2011 
Go ahead, brag around, first time is something to remember
I dont spend my time looking for people to tag... However, it seemed a good opportunity to display how useless the current tagging efforts are, that they literally dont even tag actual scam threats because theyre too busy trying to keep newbies off the forum. Dont let that stop you from trying to find a way to turn my positive action into a negative though...
And a single untrusted user you tag doesn't prove you're more useful than harmful for the forum. You shouldn't generalize so easily.
Even if it means Red Painting TM a Global Moderator - hilariousandco and his sock puppet hilariousetc ?
Being a moderator doesn't matter. If he were a scammer he should be tagged without hesitation. If you're implying he is then say so.It's very strange calling "sock puppet" a secondary account he's explicitly informed is his alt account to be used in unsecured environments.