The hacker Commander X of the hacking group 'Anonymous' yesterday on twitter revealed himself to be Anonymous Pirate, creator of Mazacoin.


For those who don't know who Commander X is, check out this article:  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/03/12/Anonymous-Unmasked-Meet-Christopher-Doyon-aka-Commander-X

I have a new identity proposal, although its not as cool as the idea Satoshi is a time traveling alien AI.  A group of hackers compromise some of Satoshi's old accounts then immediately go after Mazacoin's old website having acquired old account info belonging to Anonymous Pirate.  Therefore, I postulate that Anonymous Pirate and Satoshi are the same person.  https://mazacoin.org/mazacoin-org-returns-after-compromise/

The new website is a huge improvement.  Congrats!
https://mazacoin.org/

Has gmx said anything?

Why would someone buy an account then not use it?

I haven't heard if he found Lost or not.  What did he do to piss off the Lost Dutchman?

What is the anagram for "Thanatos Oomiaks"?

Anyone who waits for the future, receives one created by someone else.

Found this posted in dead thread so re-posting here:

They may not be mining, but there are some Oglala investors who have been buying mazacoin, they aren't all poor.   With the new block rewards, the price is fairly stable even with a low amount of trades on the exchanges.  However, it is still a long term investment as it will take quite a while for the development team to implement its proposals.  This is something new so its success is not guaranteed.  keep this in mind should you choose to purchase mazacoin.  Also, I'm sure guruvan would appreciate any assistance that would speed up this process.

A lot has happened in the last year.  He may have been as enthusiastic about bitcoin as yourself at one time, might still be.  Definitely go back and apologize for being an ass and talk to him about his experiences with accepting bitcoin.  There is an opportunity to make a bitcoin friend here.  We'd be interested in hearing a merchants perspective, as well as seeing this thread turned into a successful bitcoin transaction.

If Satoshi is still around and has his keys, expect at least 1 million USD worth from his known addresses to be converted into fiat within the next year.  This is a necessary step if it is doable to convince the general public via the media that bitcoin has value. 

You could try the Pine Ridge Area Chamber of Commerce and see if there is anyone there who knows of some online shops.  http://www.pineridgechamber.com/

How about half the block reward going to the miner and the other half being divided equally among all the tribes that adopt mazacoin as an official currency?

Yes, Mazacoin needs a high value against the US dollar for the citizens to adopt it as the dollar is the currency in use.  They do not live in complete isolation from the rest of the world.  Keep in mind that those nations do not own their land in the way most nations do.  They have the use of it through treaty with the US, like Great Britain had the use of Hong Kong.  This is an immoral stance for the US in my opinion.  However, that's a different though not unrelated issue as it demonstrates the position they are in with regards to the power the US holds over those nations to force them to concede to US commercial or government interests that desire to exploit that land or whatever they want.  Mazacoin as a currency would be a step in the direction of self determination for those nations.

Since Mazacoin isn't backed by gold and doesn't have widespread use, it has to get that value against the dollar from exchanges.  As Mazacoin is gradually, over time, being accepted and used as a currency, it will function as a means of generating wealth to those nations that mine it and trade it.  The promise of wealth and ease of use over fiat generates acceptance.  So, yes, the exchange value is very important for the citizens of those nations to adopt and use it and improve their standard of living in the process.

It does seem to be Payu.  Thankyou for the update if you are.  However, I can see how this is a valid concern, considering this user has only two posts for this year showing in his profile.

If "to argue" can be defines thusly:  give reasons or cite evidence in support of an idea, action, or theory, typically with the aim of persuading others to share one's view.  Wouldn't this indicate an attempt at clarification and not an argument since no evidence was presented in conjunction with the question?

This should be considered a pump attempt until there is a statement from the development team.

I imagine there will soon be a hat passed around collecting coins to buy a barrel of tar and some goose feathers, to give to you as a gift for your ideas.