We do not need super experts in the Judges Committee.
Most of the questions will be asked just to get an expert opinion.
For example, I am a founder of the company. And I am sure that my project will be of interest to the investor Mr. X. But he doesn't respond to my messages. And this is obvious, if I found his contacts, then hundreds of others found and wrote. Therefore, I go to the AskBrains platform, pay and send a message. But now I know for sure that he will see my message and write his opinion about my project.
Even ordinary people in the Judges Committee will understand whether this investor has even bottom the essence of the project or hasn't even read the description.
This is not freelancing. There are no tasks as such. The Judges Committee checks whether the expert has bottom of the issue and nothing more.
Thank you for your comments and clarifications. Now I understand your idea. And I want to say that I have not seen such an idea on the market. I thought that you want to make a freelance platform, and your AskBrains project is much more interesting.
I immediately understood that AskBrains is a cool project! I am very happy that other people began to understand this too
Post
Topic
BoardTokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] AskBrains - new wave in professional communications ⚡️⚡️ Bounty
by
Ragnar_loves_vikingcrypto
on 22/07/2019, 18:33:26 UTC
Do you have the white list? I want to sign up.
Post
Topic
BoardTokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] AskBrains - new wave in professional communications ⚡️⚡️ Bounty
There was once similar project that propose an idea of experts earning by help answer questions. It didn't go well. Nonetheless, you might ends up better, so allow me to ask about details, first of all, how will you prove that the experts are indeed experts?
You're wrong! This is not the same project as the rest.
If you read all the information provided by the guys, you would understand it.
It was enough for me to read these 2 articles to understand it!