Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 28 results by Rastro
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 30/06/2019, 18:52:35 UTC
that were the best thing which we can do for the MTNC community.
but i think this isnt possible...  Undecided
It was nearly a one-person project at beginning. Despite the fact that months ago, back in 2018, ideaupdater wrote that he planned to hire others for the project, but by now we can believe that he did not hire anyone else, and the project was abandoned. Hope from time to time, and honestly, till now I don't "see light at the end of tunnels" for Masternode coin. However, you are likely right that no one can take over this project, except when ideaupdater decide to give the project to community.

No, the community does not need Ideaupdater to take the project. The code is there and it is open-source. We just need a new developer.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 18/05/2019, 20:39:09 UTC
Nothing is working. There are chain splits, there is not a working explorer and nobody knows what the right chain is.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 15/05/2019, 02:50:15 UTC
Cryptopia has closed and will get liquidated!!!!!!!  Cry  Cry  Cry  Cry  Cry  Cry  Cry
```Press release

Cryptopia Limited appoints Grant Thornton as liquidators

David Ruscoe and Russell Moore from Grant Thornton New Zealand were yesterday appointed liquidators of Cryptopia

Despite the efforts of management to reduce cost and return the business to profitability, it was decided the appointment of liquidators was, in the best interests of customers, staff and other stakeholders.

The liquidators are focused on securing the assets for the benefit of all stakeholders. While this process and investigations take place, trading on the exchange is suspended.```
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Balances
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 02/05/2019, 13:44:12 UTC

which wallet should we currently use?

The new Walltet (MTNC-qt Reborn) does not show me any coins

Please Help  ... Thanks

See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2056867.msg50807677#msg50807677
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 02/05/2019, 12:53:48 UTC
thanks novaexchange that they support us to swap new MTNC .
we just waiting for cryptopia's feed back.

by the way, all old mtnc holders will swap to new MTNC  in a limited amount of time. the rule will coming next.

Before that, how can we make sure we are on the correct chain?

Sending MTNC to NovaExchange to qualify for the SWAP would be harder without syncing the correct chain.

EXACTLY!! We first need a working explorer and a snapshot to put our wallets in the right chain.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 26/04/2019, 15:47:15 UTC
How to put the coins in the new wallet?
Using importprivkey I get the error "Invalid private key encoding (code -5)". And putting the old wallet in the directory I get an error message and no coins appear there.
Has anybody got to put the coins in the new wallet?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 05/03/2019, 20:07:19 UTC
I tried to sync my wallet a few days ago but wasn't able to.

MTNC wallet eats all my bandwidth despite I have super fast internet at home and there was no internet connection on my other computers, TV, etc.

t was for sure MTNC wallet because when I switched him off my internet connection get back to normal. This is the same thing as a few months ago when there was a chain split.

I was out of sync and couldn't resync because of this same problem.

Last time I tried with my old 4.0 wallet and today when I have a little more time I'll update to a new 4.1 wallet and let you know if I was able to sync and share other stats.

This good idea to share info maybe there is really no need for the swap. This will only hurt the coin.

Like I said I have updated my wallet to the newest version 4.1.0.0 and started synchronization.

As always MTNC wallet eat my internet connection and no other apparat connected to the internet at home were able to work properly.

Despite everything I turned wallet on in the night and in the morning I was synced.

From what I see I am on this same chain as @WWzsocki because network wage is small only 100K+ and I got stakes every minute with 100K MTNC staked.

So is anybody able to tell which chain is the right one or only the developer is able to do that?

Why the hell there will be a swap if there are only a few problems which could be easily resolved?

No, nobody but the developer can tell you what is the right chain. But getting stakes every minute is not a good sign.

There won't be a swap for now. A swap could be useful to get rid of the developer, that does nothing at all, and start with a new developer and a new team. But first we would need to find a new developer, a new team and make a good project.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 03/03/2019, 23:03:21 UTC
Correct me if I am wrong but if one download new wallet and sync then should be automatically on the right chain?

Problems can happen to older wallets and already staking users and masternodes even if with the latest wallet.

Right?


Nope.
It only happen if the MTNC team make a built-in wallet nodes.
If they don't do that, you have to add active nodes (nodes on right chain) to sync your wallet on right chain, and let them staking on right chain.
After that, your wallet will give your real staking rewards on right chain.
By now, no one knows which chain is the right one, and which nodes are on right chain.

True. All you need is a working explorer and the community can handle every thing.
Right now there is no explorer and one exchange that will definitely delist soon because of his irresponsive behavior as an admin.

who lost faith in this coin??
raise your hand please.

We have a member @Snodo who was the creator of the latest explorer.

From what I know this should be no problem to set up new explorer and he has already handed over all needed info to @Ideaupdater months ago.

I keep thinking if a community can take over such a project like MTNC if the developer is not reachable anymore?

Or even against the developer? The hard fork I guess?

Yes, we could take over MTNC and get rid of the developer with a fork. But we would need a new developer. Without a developer no coin can survive.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 03/03/2019, 07:15:51 UTC
What is the latest bootstrap we could trust?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 03/03/2019, 06:47:15 UTC
Here is an explorer:
http://mtnc.snodo.de:3001/

But nobody but the developer can say if this explorer in on the right chain or not. It says "Masternodes 0", which is very estrange.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ▉ANN▉ MTNC ▉▉▉▉░ Masternodecoin ░▉▉▉ Multiple Privacy Center Platform
by
Rastro
on 15/02/2019, 00:49:56 UTC
There is a last chance to recover a small percentage of the invested money in (almost) dead coins like this one. It is to swap it for another currency that take dead projects like this one. I know two, but maybe there are more:

Merge:
https://discord.gg/2wpurMH

SalvajeProject:
https://discord.gg/Sf3w4Py


By the way, is there a working explorer for this coin?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: Any new promising Masternode coins?
by
Rastro
on 19/05/2018, 09:07:07 UTC
I like Diamond (DMD). Not exactly new; it is 4 years old, and I trust it. Very promising are Rupaya and Digiwage (former Phils). Another one I like is Akroma, based on Ethereum. All the team is showed in the web site with their names and photos.

What do you think of Syndicate?
And what about Tokugawa?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65%
by
Rastro
on 03/04/2018, 13:55:36 UTC
Thanks a lot!  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65%
by
Rastro
on 03/04/2018, 13:27:55 UTC
I have problems to sync. My wallet is is struck at block 126230 (3 hours behind). It looks I'm not the only one. Some of the peers I'm connected to are on that block, while others are on 126834. What can I do?

exact same issue here, same block stuck on 126230. and all my coins currently immature.
it would appear we are on wrong chain, I have stakes that are minted with around 50+ confirmations
that I suspect are orphans.
 reinstalling didn't fix. (latest version wallet)

answer to Q18 is solving this
make sure u delete peers.dat too
https://diamond-info.github.io/#q18

once we after block 130000 this issues will be solved the new 3.0.1.0 wallets will then stop to talk with old wallets

please everyone be aware that at latest on april 6th u MUST update ur wallet to the latest one 3.0.1.0
all old wallets will at block 130000 lose connection to mainnet

Thanks a lot. It takes a hell to download everything. Is there a bootstrap we can download?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65%
by
Rastro
on 03/04/2018, 08:07:46 UTC
I have problems to sync. My wallet is is struck at block 126230 (3 hours behind). It looks I'm not the only one. Some of the peers I'm connected to are on that block, while others are on 126834. What can I do?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] CROPCOIN [CROP] | Masternodes | Gpu | PoS | Decentralized Marketplace
by
Rastro
on 03/03/2018, 04:34:58 UTC
How can I compile the Linux QT wallet? With the src/makefile.unix I only get cropcoind, but not the qt wallet.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][MAG] X11 POS/POW+Masternodes MAGNET / magnetwork.io
by
Rastro
on 02/02/2018, 19:35:44 UTC
Hi,

I have a masternode and since 15 hours ago my wallet reports “updating network list”. In the monitoring of masternodes.online it shows “inactive” “ofline” “expired”. What can I do?

Update: in the log file I have this:

“CActiveMasternode::ManageStatus() - not capable: Can't detect external address. Please use the masternodeaddr configuration option.”
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][MAG] X11 POS/POW+Masternodes MAGNET / magnetwork.io
by
Rastro
on 02/02/2018, 19:20:07 UTC
Hi,

I have a masternode and since 15 hours ago my wallet reports “updating network list”. In the monitoring of masternodes.online it shows “inactive” “ofline” “expired”. What can I do?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [UPDATE]PhilsCurrency[PHILS][SCRYPT][POW][MASTERNODE][INSTANTX][COINMIX][NO ICO]
by
Rastro
on 13/01/2018, 23:09:56 UTC
I have all dependencies. An I have compiled other wallets without problems.  Huh
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [UPDATE]PhilsCurrency[PHILS][SCRYPT][POW][MASTERNODE][INSTANTX][COINMIX][NO ICO]
by
Rastro
on 13/01/2018, 18:54:11 UTC
I had no problems compiling other wallets but I failed with this one. This is the output when I try to compile in Linux:

First, running config I got this:
Code:
./configure: line 12851: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12857: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12888: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 13014: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found

Then, trying to compile:
Code:
CXX libbitcoin_common_a-spork.o
chainparams.cpp: In constructor ‘CMainParams::CMainParams()’:
chainparams.cpp:142:52: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[PUBKEY_ADDRESS] = list_of(56);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:143:53: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[SCRIPT_ADDRESS] = list_of(118);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:144:53: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[SECRET_KEY] = list_of(117);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:145:72: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[EXT_PUBLIC_KEY] = list_of(0x04)(0x88)(0xB2)(0x1E);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:146:72: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[EXT_SECRET_KEY] = list_of(0x04)(0x88)(0xAD)(0xE4);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp: In constructor ‘CTestNetParams::CTestNetParams()’:
chainparams.cpp:205:53: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[PUBKEY_ADDRESS] = list_of(111);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:206:53: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[SCRIPT_ADDRESS] = list_of(196);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:207:53: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[SECRET_KEY] = list_of(239);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:208:72: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[EXT_PUBLIC_KEY] = list_of(0x04)(0x35)(0x87)(0xCF);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
chainparams.cpp:209:72: error: ambiguous overload for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::vector’ and ‘boost::assign_detail::generic_list’)
base58Prefixes[EXT_SECRET_KEY] = list_of(0x04)(0x35)(0x83)(0x94);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:69:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/vector.tcc:167:5: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(const std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:64:0,
from chainparamsbase.h:9,
from chainparams.h:9,
from chainparams.cpp:7:
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:450:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>&&) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(vector&& __x) noexcept(_Alloc_traits::_S_nothrow_move())
^~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_vector.h:471:7: note: candidate: std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>& std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::operator=(std::initializer_list<_Tp>) [with _Tp = unsigned char; _Alloc = std::allocator]
operator=(initializer_list __l)
^~~~~~~~
Makefile:3160: recipe for target 'libbitcoin_common_a-chainparams.o' failed
make[2]: *** [libbitcoin_common_a-chainparams.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/durr/philscurrency/src'
Makefile:6537: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/durr/philscurrency/src'
Makefile:569: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed