Guess the GC code had an integer overflow in it   Like I explained, this is what happens when you use too much math and go over a 9 quintillion satoshi calculation. That's 9 with 18 zeroes. Although that's pretty hard to believe, apparently it's happening on multiple coins now too. Surprise!

*sets off fireworks*

Coins ops are the worst programmers.  

Sorry, thought you were totally trolling before. Yes, the bottom two nSubsidy are equal.

In the first statement(one above the bottom) the earlier *COIN will be "reversed" by the later /COIN. But there's no reason to have that many operations. nSubsidy is the satoshi value of the block, so since age is the only real factor here. Usually (for neatness and speed) you want to convert to satoshis last and not keep switching between 1s(coin) and 10,000,000s(satoshi). You want something neat and readable like this:


Dividing by 10 is an easy way to multiply by 0.1 (daily age modifier towards reward) and to avoid using floating points. Then you multiply by COIN to calculate the satoshi value. This is actually exactly the same math as the existing algorithmn, but simplified, and another *COIN added. Here is the original logic and why we are dividing by 10:

nRewardCoinYear / 365 / COIN  ==  36.5 * COIN / 365 / COIN  ==  0.1

There is NO need to do all of those operations other than if you're reading the code and have no idea what the 0.1 value means, or if you are trying to do math in years instead of days, like above. Now it looks pretty retarded, doesn't it?

Keep in mind that's untested so definitely don't use that until you test it, and it might be missing something(I'm sure it is)

Hope that makes a bit more sense.

Can't tell if trolling or you can't figure it out =p

That's not the issue. The value is to be returned in satoshis (multiplied by COIN). I thought I made that perfectly clear.

Post revised because OP is a liar.

(ILT main.h L41)
(ILT main.cpp L998)

I was going to post a solution, but since you are intent on lying to all of us, I don't think that's wise. Not a complete clone, but it's up the family tree. Anyone with half a brain(in fact math only needs half) could figure out how to simplify this to make overflows practically impossible. What they might not see, is that dividing by COIN still puts the fuckin return value in non-satoshi format (THE REQUIRED FORMAT). The same thing I posted 11 pages ago. There is a little more to it, though.