Search content
Sort by

Showing 17 of 17 results by Sailor11
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Merits 5 from 1 user
Re: Livecoin
by
Sailor11
on 29/12/2020, 14:35:16 UTC
⭐ Merited by malevolent (5)
Probably the haven of scamcoins and ponzi schemes. The only exchange that kept offering bitconnect trading for months after the ponzi collapsed.
Holds a vast amount of shit/scam coins, only traded on their exchange. (OTN, DIG, GOAL and around 200 more useless scamcoins).

I sense an exit-scam soon after they trap a few newbies with their latest promotion. They will probably say they got hacked and they lost all funds. Same recipe as cryptopia probably, another home of scamcoins.

Came back just because I remembered I posted this last year.

I remember many of you were part of this scam exchange promotion. And many of you that claim to be ethical and always do due diligence you were promoting this scam.
I just hope that my warning as well as everyone else that made a post about this scam have at least helped a few people not to lose their money.
Peace out.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: the price of bitcoin again above 10,000, where it will move ?? interesting
by
Sailor11
on 02/08/2019, 17:55:08 UTC
You have to be ready for all scenarios possible especially when there are a lot of shill accounts ready to blast anyone thinking outside their little box.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Pomp Vs. Peter
by
Sailor11
on 01/08/2019, 20:43:01 UTC
I actually created a topic about this like 12 hours ago. Died out immediately unfortunately. Sad https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5171072.msg52023538

Anyway, as always from Peter Schiff's arguments, he always liked to throw around that "Bitcoin is not stable hence not a good currency and SoV".

I mean, I expected him to be an expert at these stuff, but does he really expect that a 10 year old open market asset to be stable in price in a decade alone(? While bitcoin is not the ideal currency and SoV currently for most people in economically healthy countries(compared to countries like Venezuela), it can be in the future. To get there, we're going to need a lot of liquidity from traders, speculators/investors, and from niche users(like us here). It's going to take some time for it to be stable in price like gold. It frustrates me a lot why almost no one defending Bitcoin points out the lack of liquidity that could increase with time.

peter's position is simple conservatism. by his rules, he can't really be proven wrong. he's right that bitcoin could be an asset bubble, and we can't affirmatively know that now---only long afterwards in hindsight. if the object is store-of-value and not speculative gains, then he's right that bitcoin is unreliable.

the thing about conservatives is they are always fighting the future and never foresee big changes. i believe he will be proven wrong in time, but he's correct that we bitcoiners are in no position to declare bitcoin a store-of-value yet.

Would be interesting to see if you will get the same amount of hatred as I got when I expressed the same position on store-of-value. Seems that quite a few members of bitcointalk feel it is ok to curse and criticize any new member that express a reasonable and detailed point of view which is different from what they are told the last 2 years.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Libra has competitive advantages over Bitcoin. We let this happen.
by
Sailor11
on 19/07/2019, 19:44:28 UTC
If you don't have any concerns about Bitcoin you can always go allin and bash anyone that has a different opinion.
When would you understand that it is not just about bitcoin but crypto-enthusiast as a whole? I like to be anonymous, I like to have freedom over my transactions, I like to have the code-open-sourced. I don't care what market value is of the coin as long as I don't want to use banks. I don't like someone watching over my transactions. Read all that and think about Libra again, "Libra created by FACEBOOK".

Please read my other comments also on this post. We are not far. Why would you think I'm in bitcointalk? I see that this community doesn't take Libra seriously, that's the reason I'm posting this.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Libra has competitive advantages over Bitcoin. We let this happen.
by
Sailor11
on 19/07/2019, 19:37:11 UTC
What do you think the world needs?

people need to have freedom, to have something decentralized like bitcoin.

Digital gold or a fast and secure digital currency?

as I said, people need decentralized things, bitcoin can be "digital gold" and can also be used as a means of payments, I do not see why people would use Libra if they can use Fiat to make purchases

I agree with this:

Libra Is Like Sending a Friend Request to Terrorists, Politician Says

From my point of view the Bitcoin community seem to be stagnant, without any real targets set.

This is a big joke, you know this is not true.

What are the targets you want Bitcoin to have?

just google it

It can become a store of value but right now it is just a speculative investment. Thank you for the cointelegraph link, I haven't read that one.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Libra has competitive advantages over Bitcoin. We let this happen.
by
Sailor11
on 19/07/2019, 19:31:20 UTC
Do we have a shill here? Move this damn thread to Shit-Coin discussion already.

@op : I would have taken your argument into account if you could compare them based on the technical specifications. But for peanut brains like you who judges a coin by it's market value, I don't have much to discuss. Let me guess, you created your first ever bitcoin wallet on Coinbase? And got fucked over by one of these scammy exchanges.

Shill for what Libra? Yes dude I bought Libra and shilling the coin. I will sell when double.... Obviously you don't know what you are talking about. I am not qualified enough to discuss technical issues although I understand them. Also all your guesses are wrong. Plus I didn't get scammed by any exchange. This was obviously a try to attack the person by looking into his history.
The argument is what it is. If you don't have any concerns about Bitcoin you can always go allin and bash anyone that has a different opinion.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Libra has competitive advantages over Bitcoin. We let this happen.
by
Sailor11
on 19/07/2019, 19:23:34 UTC
if op was post it on reddit mod will ban him for scamming and mislead people to say that bitcoin is only store of value and its far away from the truth because low supply cryptos is

store of value and cash in the same time and was designed in this way,


if he post this on reddit after the mods kick his ass out the users over there will debunk the ass of mr fuckereberg with logic because libra is joke for experts in economics and blockchain.


whether its stable coin or usd which is only lose' value because supply is unlimited its the same shit ask any economist about this.




If I believe in a digital currency that is Bitcoin only. This means I don't have to speak my concerns with the community especially when there is a clear threat for all cryptocurrencies?
This is a list of facebook acquisitions, most were seen as possible disruptors for the market. So perhaps you will actually realize the threat too and stop your winning bullshit about reddit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_Facebook
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Libra has competitive advantages over Bitcoin. We let this happen.
by
Sailor11
on 19/07/2019, 19:15:41 UTC
What do you think the world needs?
Digital gold or a fast and secure digital currency?

Of course it needs digital gold, we already have fast and secure digital currency - we have Visa and Mastercard, we have PayPal and Venmo. In most countries using payment cards for daily purchases is very comfortable - fees are low or even zero, confirmations are instant, buyers are protected from fraud and in many cases can get their money back. What the world didn't have before Bitcoin is a digital store of value that can't be seized by the government, can't be frozen by banks, can't be stopped by laws and regulations.

You are making sense. Most of the comments do also. I'm trying not to be adamantant on most of my positions thats why I asked and I read each and every answer carefully. This is my current position but perhaps I will be more flexible if this is discussed in a convincing manner. I have to thank the bitcointalk community for their insight as usual. There are a lot of really intelligent people on this forum.

My job for around 5 years was to observe rejected transactions through a lot of banking systems, POS and E-commerce made with Visa, Mastercard, AMEX and a few more ways of payments. You can't imagine how many problems exist, especially for overseas transactions (US to EU mostly and the opposite). There is not just one centralized system that has to process a transaction, but usually three or four. On any of these systems there are variables that might cause a transaction to fail. Most of these variables are unknown to the card holder and to the merchant. Quite a few doesn't even have to do with them but with the card options. So in order for a transaction to proceed you have to put trust to your Bank, your card (Visa/Master), the outside companies that processed the details in their database, the merchants bank and it goes on. All these are based in centralized servers. One server goes down (and they go down very often) and you get rejections. One data would be entered wrong and you might not be able to buy tickets at the airdrop you were making vacations. These are real problems that are not rare.
So the first thing the world needed and Bitcoin provided was this. Cancel the middle man. Noone needs to trust a bank or outside processing companies. You just trust yourself, the tech and cut the middle man.
What was actually needed was this model. It was close to flawless and at least a few thousand of people realized it immediately.
Paypal was a revolution as well. Still it has many problems, like limits and refunds, that are probably unsolvable.

My point is that Facebook with Libra, is actually stealing the hard work that was invested for Bitcoin to become the absolute means of transactions. What was needed so the whole world would adopt it was low fees (as it used to have for a while) and instant transactions. I say it looks stagnant because the Lightning Network doesn't seem to be a priority. Also there are many doubts if LN can work the way it is supposed to. I believe there should be more effort made in this subject.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees
by
Sailor11
on 19/07/2019, 18:38:51 UTC
The BCH post used to be fun. Now it's full of BSV nonsense, making Bcash look like a victim.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Libra has competitive advantages over Bitcoin. We let this happen.
by
Sailor11
on 19/07/2019, 17:52:49 UTC
In the near future you will see libra on top-10 of every cryptocurrency index as it will be valued in Billions even as a stablecoin.
All indexes already have Libra's spot ready and waiting for the release.
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/libra
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/facebook-libra/
https://www.worldcoinindex.com/news/facebook-unveils-its-native-cryptocurrency-libra-in-a-bid-to-transform-global-finance

"Reaching the unbanked"
From the coindesk article it is clear that Libra will be a fierce competitor of Bitcoin:
https://www.coindesk.com/facebook-launches-subsidiary-to-support-new-libra-crypto
So our moto "Banking the unbanked" is now Libra's main verse and noone seems to actually care.

Our main devs decided Bitcoin should become digital "Store of Value", short of gold but in digits, instead of "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" as stated on the title of the Whitepaper.
Facebook probably discovered that Bitcoin has difficulties in scaling so they made in no-time an answer to what the world exactly needs.

What do you think the world needs?
Digital gold or a fast and secure digital currency?

From my point of view the Bitcoin community seem to be stagnant, without any real targets set. What are the targets you want Bitcoin to have?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: What is going here someone can explain to me pls guys
by
Sailor11
on 17/07/2019, 18:35:54 UTC
Just know the mods here are far away from to be great or help,

in quality places only say Bitcoin sv and the mods say promote your scam elsewhere not here, and other also.

This place support libra Facebook coin while in quality place the mods Warren people from stable coins scam and in  Reddit you cannot post this shit as Reddit flooded by negative information about livra with the mods toegther.

Try to say in quality places

Supply dosent matter or don't affect  the price automatically the mods them self debunk and help.
Look on Reddit crypto, I am and few other  heavily active over there and other quality places, they expose a lot of shit , try to say Tron,xrp or supply dosent matter or talk about stable coins and see what the reaction from mods  .and others.

Look how mods over there and in other places exposed that Tron is more centralized then Facebook coin and tether is scam, and clear the bullshit,

Here something very fishy the place is full of shit and new people which come to learn here are LOST

The mods in Reddit and other quality places exposed that tether stable coin is scam,


This is what sad


This is the Bitcoin forum, created by Satoshi to promote solutions in Bitcoin's Code and explain how it would become a dominant digital currency.
No mod promotes libra or tether here. Moreover, most of older members see altcoins as useless except perhaps trading them on a few breakouts.

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched!
by
Sailor11
on 14/07/2019, 08:42:51 UTC
The correct value for litecoin is the bitcoin value divided by four.

If this was somehow true, then it's bad news for Bitcoin's price.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Livecoin.net Scam
by
Sailor11
on 13/07/2019, 16:23:35 UTC
Funny that I posted this on same day, only a couple of hours before your post

So it was not a coincidence, we got it

No, I didn't mean anything against the op. His post was a personal experience and I read all of it. I had forgotten about Monacoin and Livecoin incident. Otherwise I would have added that too in my post.
I didn't mean it this way. I'm sure the op was aware of the livecoin campaign as well and was mad with them. I'm sure he didn't even notice my post which was just a small argument on their practices and the coins they keep trading.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Livecoin.net Scam
by
Sailor11
on 13/07/2019, 11:28:51 UTC
Funny that I posted this on same day, only a couple of hours before your post.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5159642.msg51638846#msg51638846

Livecoin instantly blamed Monacoin on their ANN thread for what happened. Seriously they don't have communication with their clients and they have to ask in a forum? Obviously they have but wanted to shift the blame on the developer side.

On another subject, there were quite a few Bitcointalk older members that were promoting this exchange with their signature. Some of them are always accusing people of not doing due diligence before they promote a scam project. I've seen them giving negative trust to people that promote them. Yet quite a few of them promoted Livecoin.

DID YOU DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE? Did you not know what livecoin is? So hypocritical.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][MANA]Decentraland Tokenized VIrtual Reality with Open Standards
by
Sailor11
on 03/07/2019, 17:56:42 UTC
Mana didn't quite pump as I expected during this bull run. Since I haven't found something better or similar in the decentralized world, I keep having high hopes on this. Although I'd prefer more advertisement and perhaps support from Binance on the platform. Not on price, but I beleive they should become active in decentraland as Bittrex already is.

I do like Decentraland as a project, but my own opinion is that the price of MANA is not necessarily coupled to the project success.  I think that the main asset in Decentraland is (obviously) LAND instead.  Even if the project is successful, why would MANA have to go to the moon?  You need it to trade land, and projects built on top of Decentraland may use it as currency - but both won't necessarily mean that there has to be huge demand for MANA in the economy.

If I'm not mistaken you can buy LAND only with MANA. You can use other coins too but they are automatically converted to MANA. So the more LAND is sold more demand for MANA. Furthermore, a percentage of MANA is burned which results in reduced supply which should have a positive impact on the price

Sure, but if I have BTC and want to own LAND, then I can just buy MANA when I need it and there is no real reason to hold it.  Of course, if LAND trading volume is massive, that creates a certain demand for MANA.  But I (personally) think that holding LAND itself is definitely better as a bet on the project's future than holding MANA (although then you have to invest more time and money, obviously).

Is the supply of MANA actually capped?  Last time I tried to check it, I only found "transparency pages" that listed the current supply, without any strong statements about a hard maximum supply.  To me that sounded like there is none and the project can create MANA as they wish (probably with certain rules but still).

Not sure if MANA is capped. Although cmc states total supply is over 2bn. I agree that currently holding LAND is better bet. But for me this is closely correlated. If all MANA used for buying LAND is burned (not sure if all actually is burned, I think I read it somewhere), then eventually there will not be a lot of MANA available on the market and the price should rise. Imagine if in a decade only 1 million MANA is circulating. Then the price of 1 MANA could be huge. I could be dead wrong but this sound like one of the better tokenomics in crypto.
There was a vote by users of decentraland last November that stopped the inflation.
https://agora.decentraland.org/polls/44211cd6-fff5-4354-9c56-9a7c1378bb4c

I guess the max supply can only decrease now with a burn of mana used in a new auction.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][MANA]Decentraland Tokenized VIrtual Reality with Open Standards
by
Sailor11
on 28/06/2019, 20:23:52 UTC
Mana didn't quite pump as I expected during this bull run. Since I haven't found something better or similar in the decentralized world, I keep having high hopes on this. Although I'd prefer more advertisement and perhaps support from Binance on the platform. Not on price, but I beleive they should become active in decentraland as Bittrex already is.

I'll keep holding one of the best performers of 2018 and hope the crypto world realizes the true potential of this project, besides from trading it.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Topic OP
Livecoin
by
Sailor11
on 28/06/2019, 17:45:30 UTC
Probably the haven of scamcoins and ponzi schemes. The only exchange that kept offering bitconnect trading for months after the ponzi collapsed.
Holds a vast amount of shit/scam coins, only traded on their exchange. (OTN, DIG, GOAL and around 200 more useless scamcoins).

I sense an exit-scam soon after they trap a few newbies with their latest promotion. They will probably say they got hacked and they lost all funds. Same recipe as cryptopia probably, another home of scamcoins.