Search content
Sort by

Showing 9 of 9 results by Sarah_PinkApp
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: PinkApp.io is a SCAM
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 24/10/2017, 22:58:24 UTC
Sigh.. I wish I got paid for interviews!

Anyway, for those of you watching at home, here's our latest preview:
https://vimeo.com/239655911
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Pink: Escort startup Series A share sale
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 24/10/2017, 22:47:50 UTC
Latest app preview:

https://vimeo.com/239655911
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: PinkApp.io is a SCAM
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 21/10/2017, 12:37:39 UTC
1. Anonymous team, yes. This is only given the legalities of the service we are offering.

2. Whitepaper to be expected on Monday.

3. I can't comment on this; that's Brad's area.

4. If you expected a perfectly linear increase in funding with no stops along the way, you clearly have no idea how raising funds works. As of now, we are here: https://seriesa.pinkapp.io/

5. You're speculating here by making assumptions; do you have any hard evidence these are bought/hacked?

6. Eros.vision doesn't look anything like http://pinkapp.io. Obviously you can check for yourself.

7. What's your point here?


If you're interested in checking us out further:

Join our Slack channel:

https://join.slack.com/t/pinkapp/shared_invite/enQtMjQ0NjI2MDM0ODY1LWJhMGQ5ZTY4ZjRmODFlMTRlYWU3NDUwYWMzMDA1MGVlZGE1NThlN2ZjMWE2NGYxODRmNmY2NTg1YWI2MWM0YTk



Follow me on Reddit:

https://www.reddit.com/user/Sarah_PinkApp/


Read our Medium articles:

https://medium.com/@pinkapp

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Pink: Escort startup Series A share sale
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 21/10/2017, 12:28:03 UTC
That's interesting you have an escort on staff. What's an example of a policy directly influenced by having someone with her experience there that you wouldn't have otherwise thought of?

One thing was health checks. As an outsider, it seems like a good idea. It sounds straightforward. Health checks actually received a very negative response from sex workers. If we advertise that everyone is certified healthy, then clients are more likely to pressure providers into doing unsafe acts.


On top of that, it's virtually impossible to assure health status in any individual in this industry - clients or providers alike.

Other policies:

- Having to sleep with a provider to prove she is a real provider - that was scrapped as soon as I heard of it
- We're actually getting testimonials and feedback from providers, which wasn't done before I arrived
- Tiered screening
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Pink: Escort startup Series A share sale
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 15/10/2017, 01:28:32 UTC
We've got some videos from providers in support of our product. Check them out here:

https://vimeo.com/238137997

https://vimeo.com/238114413

https://vimeo.com/238113796
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Pink: Escort startup Series A share sale
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 15/10/2017, 01:16:40 UTC
This is hilarious  Grin Grin Grin

How many escorts know how to tie their shoes much less download, install and secure a wallet?

Or you want the pimps to do it for them Lawl! Or are we supposed to be the pimps since we invested in the system? I can see it now... Some big dude busting in the door because his computer gets a fatal exception error every time he tries to open the wallet, demanding his hard-earned money.

Clearly you have zero idea of any work that's involved in being an escort. Your ignorance is overwhelming.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Pink: Escort startup Series A share sale
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 10/10/2017, 00:17:30 UTC
We've posted a preview video here:

https://vimeo.com/237475162
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [Update: Results of Women survey] ⚤ SexService.io SSIO — Sex dating service
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 07/10/2017, 19:53:43 UTC

1. There cannot be ensured.
Even if case of centralized system and document ID checking, any can use ID of other person.

I disagree fully here. Plenty of online platforms have systems in place to prevent this, such as Eros and P411. Do your research on requirements. 

Quote
2. No screening.
Only a considered reputation system.

This is exactly the same as a review board, a culture many sex workers are trying to get away from. Sex workers deserve the right to know if clients are safe, clean, and honour the agreed-upon donation. A simple points or reputation system does none of this.

Quote
3. Yes, that is exactly our survey showed.



That cash is the main reason of violence among sex workers? That's an absurd statement and your survey does nothing to back up any such claim because you haven't validated your survey with any research methods. You're just using it to promote the idea that tokens should be used instead of cash, but this in reality is a huge hassle and is likely going to drive people awat from your platform.

Quote

4. Yes, noone can provide guaranties. Even if case of centralized system and document ID checking.


I'm a sex worker and I would never use a site that has zero guarantees. Worldwide, there are already hundreds of websites that have a zero-guarantee policy: BackPage, Hidden Pages, City of Love, Lady Xena, Top Escort Babes, Euro Girls, 9 Escorts.. the list goes on. My time and efforts are better spent elsewhere.

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [Update: Results of Women survey] ⚤ SexService.io SSIO — Sex dating service
by
Sarah_PinkApp
on 07/10/2017, 13:25:51 UTC
@ezze - a few questions

1. What measures do you have in place to ensure that sex workers who register on your platform are not being coerced/trafficked, are of legal age within the country in which you launch?

2. What screening/verification methods do you have in place for clients who wish to register on your platform? Will they be required to upload documentation or provide any way of verifying their identity?

A side note - the provision/removal of cash in a transaction is not the sole indicator of violence towards women. Violence can still happen regardless of the type of payment, so your point  on cash being a trigger of such (and removing cash is a way to guarantee safety) is irrelevant.

Your platform appears to only act as a gateway for transactions without providing any guarantees if the providers are real or if the clients are safe.