Search content
Sort by

Showing 16 of 16 results by Schollepetzer
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo ICO - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
by
Schollepetzer
on 22/11/2016, 17:39:41 UTC
P-Trump runs for KMD node election!

I have been accumulating BTCD since 2014, my bags are full.

On present ICO numbers I am guaranteed one of the 64 notary nodes with my vote alone.

I am looking for an experienced and qualified person to setup and maintain a top quality node that meets all jl777's node specifications.

My guarantee to you 'I will never sell down my KMD, I will have sufficient KMD to get elected forever'

Your guarantee to me 'You will run a high quality node with above average reliability forever'

You will manage and pay for the node, and in return you will get 50% of the profits from the node, forever!

My offer is conditional on me winning a node, which is only guaranteed if there are 64 nodes, and on your ability to prove you can run and pay for a full spec node now.

I will try and verify your claim with jl777 and/or other Komodo organisers before we sign any agreements. By that time you will know I have sufficient KMD to have been elected

If there are less than 64 notary nodes at launch I may not win. If this happens I will keep my powder dry until there is an election for a full compliment of 64 notary nodes. Then I will win a node.

If you're interested please reply here. This is not a first-in-best-dressed offer, so take your time to think this offer through. I'm looking for the best candidate I can find who wants to run a notary node for a long time.



I ended up with 2.69M KMD (i.e. 2.69% of the vote)

I've had a few enquiries so far.

Now that the ICO is over attention should turn towards the coming election.

At one extreme there are tech guys with skills & time to run nodes, but not enough KMD/votes to elect themselves

At the other end there are guys with enough KMD/votes to elect themselves, but not enough time & skills to run a node

Some testnet node operators will have sufficient KMD/votes to elect themselves - my offer is obviously not of interest to you

Some testnet node operators will have arrangements with other large holders now - my offer is probably not of interest to you now (but maybe later)

Some testnet node operators will not have sufficient KMD/votes to elect themselves AND they don't have a current arrangement with another large holder - my offer should be of interest to you!

To those people running testnet notary nodes I will point out the obvious - If you don't get elected, you wont be running a notary node!

I'm looking for a long-term 'set and forget' arrangement. Assuming a standard first-past-the-post voting system, my KMD/vote quota should be enough to guarantee ~1.5 notary nodes ... Forever!

I accumulated BTCD since 2014 in the hope of securing a hassle free income stream for many years, I'm planning to hodl my KMD for many many years.

If you want a hassle free income stream for many many years too, but you're not 100% sure that you'll get elected, and KEEP getting elected, then my offer might be worth considering.

If I can't come to a mutually beneficial long-term relationship then I'll bite the bullet and pay someone to setup and manage a node for me, and I'll keep 100% of the profits.

BUT, I'd be happy with 50% of the profits if I didn't have to worry about ANYTHING.

I do really want a set and FORGET arrangement, and I'm prepared to pay 50% of the profits from running a notary node to get it.



This is an pretty impressive ammount you have there  Wink
Allow me the question, how will you ensure you can definitely get one node actively running? I understand there are 16 spots in each region. Everybody has one vote for each of the 4 regions. So for one region there could be the scenario, that you will be outvoted, especially with combined voting power of others. This assumtion is also valid for the other regions. Just curious how you can ensure this offer with 100% confidence...
Cheers!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: NXTL: Next Coin Lite - Register accounts for investors.
by
Schollepetzer
on 17/04/2014, 09:12:24 UTC
Hey there,

Im member no. 996

My NXTL accound ID is: 2600054576073032901

Muchas gracias!!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: NXTL: Next Coin Lite - Officiall Topic - Fair Distribution
by
Schollepetzer
on 16/04/2014, 12:20:58 UTC
I just sent 0.05 BTC

I want to be part of it  Wink

Txid: bde369244d0179e0c8e2d776ce4fdcd2aa44d8b84ee8be58cba3e701eec3b4aa
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
by
Schollepetzer
on 16/02/2014, 16:03:48 UTC
Hmmmm I cant get this running.

I cloned counterpartyd_build, then installed the python file, then reindexed bitcoin qt. Seems to start with server command and is catching up blocks.

However sending doesnt work:

Code:
counterpartyd send --source=address1 --destination=address2 --quantity=100 --asset=XCP

It says:
Code:
Transaction (unsigned):
"HUGE NUMBER!"
Confirm? (y/N) y
Transaction aborted.

So why is transaction aborted? I have sufficient XCP on address1 and sufficient BTC to pay the fee. Also I have set up bitcoin.conf and counterpartyd.conf correctly...

Some Ideas whats wrong here?

Any hints on that plz? Developers?
No matter what I enter, always says

Code:
Transaction aborted.

Still trying to figure out how to send XCP...
Any Idea what could cause the transaction to abort?

Is the server all caught up, or is it still processing blocks?

If so, try running the command with the "--unsigned" switch after "counterpartyd" but before "send". Does it successfully produce output?

Also, do you have a non-US keyboard configuration in use?

Actually, you can just specify "--headless" as well, instead of "--unsigned" to skip that prompt in the first place.

Server stands at block 286203 which is right I think. Its not processing any more, only giving out the "oputput" from the blockchain.

When I try with
Code:
--unsigned
, its not asking the confirmation and outputs the transaction, but its not sending XCP actually.

But when I try with
Code:
--headless
its working!!!!!!

Why is this so? I dont understand, but it seems to work this way. I have a germany keyboard layout, where y and z is swapped. But it also didnt work with pressing 'z' (supposing it would be the us 'y')...

Thank you xnova for helping me...
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
by
Schollepetzer
on 16/02/2014, 14:55:35 UTC
Hmmmm I cant get this running.

I cloned counterpartyd_build, then installed the python file, then reindexed bitcoin qt. Seems to start with server command and is catching up blocks.

However sending doesnt work:

Code:
counterpartyd send --source=address1 --destination=address2 --quantity=100 --asset=XCP

It says:
Code:
Transaction (unsigned):
"HUGE NUMBER!"
Confirm? (y/N) y
Transaction aborted.

So why is transaction aborted? I have sufficient XCP on address1 and sufficient BTC to pay the fee. Also I have set up bitcoin.conf and counterpartyd.conf correctly...

Some Ideas whats wrong here?

Any hints on that plz? Developers?
No matter what I enter, always says

Code:
Transaction aborted.

Still trying to figure out how to send XCP...
Any Idea what could cause the transaction to abort?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
by
Schollepetzer
on 16/02/2014, 12:50:22 UTC

Could anyone please give me some hints for the following error?
Thanks.

Code:
C:\counterpartyd_build>counterpartyd server

C:\counterpartyd_build>echo off
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 494, i
n
    util.bitcoind_check(db)
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 303, in bit
coind_check
    block_count = bitcoin.rpc('getblockcount', [])
  File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\bitcoin.py", line 75, in r
pc
    raise exceptions.BitcoindRPCError(str(response.status_code) + ' ' + response
.reason)
lib.exceptions.BitcoindRPCError: 401 Authorization Required




Successfully set up counterpartyd.conf and bitcoin.conf in the %USER%\Appdata\Roaming\... Folders?

Seems to me that your counterpartyd cannot connect to bitcoind via RPC...
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
by
Schollepetzer
on 16/02/2014, 11:50:53 UTC
Hmmmm I cant get this running.

I cloned counterpartyd_build, then installed the python file, then reindexed bitcoin qt. Seems to start with server command and is catching up blocks.

However sending doesnt work:

Code:
counterpartyd send --source=address1 --destination=address2 --quantity=100 --asset=XCP

It says:
Code:
Transaction (unsigned):
"HUGE NUMBER!"
Confirm? (y/N) y
Transaction aborted.

So why is transaction aborted? I have sufficient XCP on address1 and sufficient BTC to pay the fee. Also I have set up bitcoin.conf and counterpartyd.conf correctly...

Some Ideas whats wrong here?

Any hints on that plz? Developers?
No matter what I enter, always says

Code:
Transaction aborted.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin) - Official
by
Schollepetzer
on 16/02/2014, 10:36:42 UTC
Hmmmm I cant get this running.

I cloned counterpartyd_build, then installed the python file, then reindexed bitcoin qt. Seems to start with server command and is catching up blocks.

However sending doesnt work:

Code:
counterpartyd send --source=address1 --destination=address2 --quantity=100 --asset=XCP

It says:
Code:
Transaction (unsigned):
"HUGE NUMBER!"
Confirm? (y/N) y
Transaction aborted.

So why is transaction aborted? I have sufficient XCP on address1 and sufficient BTC to pay the fee. Also I have set up bitcoin.conf and counterpartyd.conf correctly...

Some Ideas whats wrong here?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] NEM : descendant of NXT - 4 billion coins - Equal Shares for ALL
by
Schollepetzer
on 24/01/2014, 15:34:23 UTC
Im in the boat...

40 NXT sent

Transaction id: 4827898344472684412
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information
by
Schollepetzer
on 21/01/2014, 08:26:17 UTC
guys, i initiated BTC withdrawal from bter.com and its been over an hour and it still hasn't cleared... is anyone experiencing the same problems?

Me too, says "processing" since 2 hours...
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information
by
Schollepetzer
on 20/01/2014, 10:26:05 UTC
BTW...
The 3 flaws in Java source have already been found? Where can I read about this?
Post
Topic
Board Biete
Re: Serverteile
by
Schollepetzer
on 20/01/2014, 08:27:28 UTC
Xeons:

5130
2x 5148
3x 5150
5430

NICs

1x Dualport, ansonsten single. Alles PCI-X

Dann bin ich leider raus...
Post
Topic
Board Altcoins (Deutsch)
Re: Ethereum
by
Schollepetzer
on 19/01/2014, 16:08:39 UTC
Weiß jemand welche Software für das Mining kompatibel ist? Scheint ja anders als Scrypt uns SHA256 zu sein...
Post
Topic
Board Biete
Re: Bitcoins/Litecoins in München/Salzburg/Wien gegen bar zu verkaufen
by
Schollepetzer
on 19/01/2014, 15:50:43 UTC
Hi über welche Mengen sprechen wir da und was wäre ein preislicher Anhaltspunkt?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Deutsch)
Re: Was mache ich falsch?
by
Schollepetzer
on 19/01/2014, 15:42:14 UTC
Evtl. kann Dein Board die Leistung über PCI-E Bus nicht liefern. Hast Du powered Riser?
Post
Topic
Board Biete
Re: Serverteile
by
Schollepetzer
on 19/01/2014, 12:00:31 UTC
Was für ein XEON X5xxx hast Du denn und evtl. 2 Stück vorhanden?