Hi everybody. I found URANUS on a website that publishes ratings from popular experts: https://topexperts.io/ico/uranus
There is a common 5.89/10 score from 25 experts

If you can really appreciate a good code, then it is easier to look for reports on this project. Professional analysts make reports from an economic point of view.

There are websites, spreadsheets, youtube bloggers, analyst aggregators, listings of ico-projects.

Hi everybody. I found HADRON on a website that publishes ratings from popular experts: https://topexperts.io/ico/hadron
There is a common 6.53/10 score from 14 experts.
What do you think about it?

Thanks. Do you mean ICO analysts on Youtube?

On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?

e. g. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2903597.0

Alternatively, you can use the sites where project scores are collected from all experts. At cryptodiffer, for example, about 20 experts are immediately visible.
There is also http://topexperts.io there are more of them, and the functionality there is better.

Usually I trust only analysts who write or shoot video on their own, e. g. Oh Hey Matty or Ian Balina.

I am a programmer with great experience and since 2016 I have been learning the blockchain. I am interested in investing in ICO projects, but I don't have an economic background to assess the potential of the project. I can study the code on github, but this is clearly not enough for successful investments. What to do in this situation, maybe pass some courses of traders?

Thanks. Do you mean ICO analysts on Youtube?

Well, icobench and icoholder seem to be normally rate. But who knows, maybe scam ICOs can buy a good rating there.

Usually I trust only analysts who write or shoot video on their own, e. g. Oh Hey Matty or Ian Balina.

I am a programmer with great experience and since 2016 I have been learning the blockchain. I am interested in investing in ICO projects, but I don't have an economic background to assess the potential of the project. I can study the code on github, but this is clearly not enough for successful investments. What to do in this situation, maybe pass some courses of traders?

Every normal expert usually has a spreadsheet, where they indicate their investments and final achievements on a separate tab. So you can determine whether to trust a particular analyst.
You can also see the statistics of project scores for all top experts. For example, it's quite conveniently on http://topexperts.io. If the individual estimates fall out - it's a reason to think.
Personally, I selected for myself the top 5 experts, whose opinion is taken into account. The rest do not even look.

You can also see the statistics of project scores for all top experts. For example, it's quite conveniently on http://topexperts.io
Or cryptodiffer
If the individual estimates fall out - it's a reason to think.

I agree... most sites take money for reviews i think

This analysts also can not be trusted, they obviously take money for paid reviews

I advise you not to dwell on 1-2 experts, reviews can be paid. No one can guarantee the success of the project.

If you look at aggregator sites, such as http://topexperts.io you can compare the scores of one project from different analysts. So you can conclude - if the project's scores are low everywhere, and on one website are high - most likely they are paid for. And vice versa.

There are no guarantees that the reports were not made for money, so you should look at reports from different experts and compare their opinions and yours. You can have a table where you will virtually “invest” in projects and then watch roi. In the future with success you can start a real investment.

Well, icobench and icoholder seem to be normally rate. But who knows, maybe scam ICOs can buy a good rating there.

But there are no guarantees that the report was not made for money.