Hi,

I could provide signed messages but that would reveal the accounts and make them useless to a potential buyer. I'd suggest using a trusted escrow to confirm account details. All have neutral trust.

Given the nature of this sale a shill could be any account of any rank, however I'm keen to get some accounts of my hands as I've said before.

I am selling a portfolio of accounts. This is ideal for promoting any kind of venture, be it a service, program or taking advantage of the giveaways on this forum.

I'm selling 6x members and 4x full members.

The reason is that I have too many accounts to take care of now as I have well over 50.

Bidding starts at 0.4 BTC and given the low price of BTC and previous market rates I expect this auction to go for much much more than this value.

Happy bidding !

Why don't you just peg it to BTC. Makes a lot more sense.

Could do with some yahoo/gmail/hotmail accounts.

Can be yahoo/gmail etc

Quote me best price by PM I want at least 100 possibly 1000

Thanks

I have done this in the past.

I've only served 3 clients with this service as it happens (although one repeat monthly contract customer, which entails X amounts of posts relating to their company per month).

In practice I cannot post with all my accounts that would require similar commitment to a full time job, although a relatively profitable one.

Banning the practice would be a nightmare for several reasons, if you would like to disagree with any of these points with evidence then please go for it, its a discussion that is important to have.

1) It would still occur. As per any market intervention. The only difference is there would be more market manipulation and less consumer protection.

2) Scamming can happen from any account, be it negative or positive. The fact that this practice can never be impossible (rather than banned by forum rules) means that there is ALWAYS the risk that a positive trust account could be used as a scammer. In fact history points to the fact that the most successful scammers here, did have positive trust. If the practice is banned it will imbue more confidence in the trust system which is fundamentally flawed. The best way to prevent scamming is for people to be aware that any account or person can scam, from the very top ie Theymos.

For posting once in a thread... your negative trust makes my eyes bleed.

Your concern is an understandable one, but consider a giveaway/promotion which requires the individual to type their username from the external site. This would be no different to that.

Alternatively a sig campaign which requires confirmation of payouts or even registration on the sig campaign boosts said product/service.

---

I'm not going to spam with one account on the thread, that is not what I'm offering. I'm offering posts from a plenitude of accounts. Paying someone to bump a thread with ten of their accounts is in practice no different to paying ten people to bump it once, so I'm slightly confused as to your concern in this regard.

As stated your offer is way below what the market is willing to bear. Quite high BTC prices based on $ value and huge surge in campaigns. Take the 0.09 offer at this $ price is my advice.

If done in the correct manner, it seems to be ethically sound and effectively no different from a normal signature campaign.

I take each client on an individual basis and have refused to provide for some services that clash with my own ethical beliefs, for example an unsecured IPO.

I have an inventory of accounts you could not imagine. Several with trust. From Jr Member to Legendary.

I absolutely respect stingleword's diligence in monitoring his advertisers. I think its a good thing that someone is hands on with their business and has a clear direction of how they want their company to be seen and how their company operates.

It is sadly where stingleword states that he wishes other advertisers were as diligent as he was, where I have a problem. Many other campaign owners don't care about the issue of multi-accounts since their company is still receiving exposure and a lot of people, myself included, write professionally and in a manner that promotes their company in a positive way. There is nothing in my personal opinion or own ethical stance that suggests multi-accounts are wrong in any way or negative for the community. There is equally nothing that seems to commercially support what appears to be a personal vendetta. What is the benefit of ''denouncing in public'' multi-account users when it is not ethically disagreeable nor against the rules of this forum, as has been well established.

Well in the same way your negative trust inspires mistrust, my service of promoting interest has many obviously conspicuous benefits. If 10 different accounts per day are discussing your website other people are going to be more likely to join in than an empty thread.

True though that is, I'd expect more buyers to be keen for the purpose of launching products or services.

You can make accounts but they will have 1 activity and be obvious shills. My accounts are all member at least.

Many discussions are easy to find relating to ethics and ''forum legality'' of multiple accounts.

CanaryInTheMine not provided feedback. I welcome any queries.

Had several PMs.

To clarify I will not reveal the name to anyone, that would be careless.

I can confirm as many details as required and a neutral escrow of any serious buyer's choosing can confirm all details during the transaction.

I'm back after a period away from the website.

I have over 30 accounts under my control and am willing to boost your service. There is an obviously massive advantage of doing this for your enterprise.

PM for more details

Hi everyone,

I'm selling an account which is a senior member. It is also trusted (default). 3 trusted positive feedback and about 15 untrusted ones. No negative feedback. The account is my own.

I'm interested in its value and possible selling it on.

Not sure how much it could be worth but I know most seniors go for about 0.3 BTC so I'd not entertain anything below or near that.

PM'd