I've been doing NiceHash X13 since they introduced it. It seems to be much better than X11 so far. Also they have the multi-algorithm switcher that seems interesting but haven't tried that yet. Both would be good additions to the list if you have the rigs to spare.

Terk, any plans for a N or X11 based switching pool with autopayouts to BTC? Seems like a lot of hashing power (GPU) has been moving in that direction, just wondering if you were planning on supporting such a thing. I love your site, but have moved all my hashing to X11 or N depending on how the wind blows and probably won't be back on scrypt again unless the wind blows back in that direction.

Question, as a miner do I only get paid at the rate of the job I'm working on or the average of the mining jobs because it seems like with the limited mining now some are working higher profit jobs than others. Seems then that isn't particularly fair as it will be random which job you get. Also if there is a higher paying unlimited job why isn't everyone working that one? It seems some are still working lower profit limited jobs?

I wasn't around the mining game when Cex.io came out, but did they have a rate of return that was significantly higher than would be expected? The KH/s rate at scrypt.cc right now seems absurd with suchmoon's first two days of reporting. If it continues to be an outlier in performance it would almost have to be a scam since otherwise other's would be able mine in a similar manner and get the same return. It could be they 'underreport' the mining rate so you're really getting more KH/s than what an equivalent cgminer would say you're getting so in reality the numbers would be similar. For example 1MH at scrypt.cc is actually equivalent to 1.2MH reported in cgminer which would account for the discrepancy in suchmoon's numbers as you're not truely comparing apples to apples.

Honestly Scrypt.cc sounds like a ponzi scheme. High initial investment? check... Unrealistic rate of return? check... at some point they'll disappear with your money, it almost seems guaranteed.

Did you configure a minimum price on nicehash? I'm going to try it with a 5.0 setting so I should get at least .005/MH/day

Maybe thats why its a Beta? LOL

Yeah surprised someone wanted to keep making free money? There's no reason H20 shouldn't have publicly divulged who he was to begin with, he was making A LOT of money off this why not be forthright?

What coins do you have selected on the GHash.io multipool? All of them? Autoconvert to BTC? Lots of options there, just wondering what you're base lining with.

They added a bunch of coins this morning, but then just recently removed NET despite mining it most of the morning. So it seems to be a little erratic right now so I keep checking every couple hours to see if they add more coins (since they aren't automatically selected).

I'm averaging .0063 BTC/MHash/day so far today, not sure if that will keep up.

I've been running on there for almost 24 hours now... Will have to do a little calculation once I start seeing payouts. I've got right about 2MH on there so I'll give it 2-3 days and see what my daily rate looks like and compare to this chart here to see if its worth it.

If nothing else, its an easy way to pick one or two coins and get autopayouts in LTC or BTC.

It was very good, then the owner/operator let it go on cruise control and gave up caring after cashing in big time. I still don't understand why anyone is pointing hash here at this point. It's clear H2O gave up a long time ago (over a month ago).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514242.0

This guy is 'normalizing' the hash rate and its mining at a much better rate than any multipool right now. If you're talking 20% better returns thats pretty significant. But I like the multipools because I want to be paid in BTC and not Vertcoin. So the first pool that comes out that autotrades Vert to BTC is going to see a lot of migration I think. As a multipool operator it would be in Terk's best interest to be first with this rather than wait for others and lose his cut.

Vertcoin is taking off, due mostly to its asic-resistant algo. Anyway we can get a pool made that mines Vert and pays in BTC? Work on that Terk! You could corner the market if you're the first out with that.

The return of the west coast server maybe? Helped get people back on board.

Latency is the biggest reason for high rejects, so yeah what is your ping to the server over that 3G router? Anything over 200ms or so is likely to create lots of rejects.

I assume because you don't know profitability of what you just did till its already over. Between the time you decide to mine something till it payouts (especially all the way to BTC) there can be a lot of flux.

Location? What server are you using? How far are you from that server? (latency?)

Those things are likely your issue and not config if your config works well at other multipools.

I just dropped from 10% to about 3-4% by switching to the new east coast US server(ny.) rather than the Oregon one (us.)

Also since the NY server is new, not many people have migrated over and it has very low load right now (only about 1.7GH vs 8 on the west coast server). That helps lower the rejects as well.

Not sure why anyone would. Past glory does not equal future success. H2O still sitting on over $100k worth of unexchanged coins. probably used it on a new house or car and is laughing at the fools still mining here.

Clevermining has a LTC line on its graph that updates daily. Not sure where they get their data but you can pull that maybe

http://www.clevermining.com/profits