Search content
Sort by

Showing 4 of 4 results by Shineup
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Risks
by
Shineup
on 25/08/2025, 21:36:25 UTC
When people talk about risk many quickly point to cryptocurrency and forex as the biggest risks anyone can take. However this mid-year August 2025 was a real eye opener. For example my wife invested a lot of time and money in beans this year but when the market crashed the losses were heavy. This shows that even physical investments can be just as risky if not more depending on the circumstances.


There is no business or investment that doesn't have share it's own share of risk in it, we can consider some business or investment as being more risky than the other, individually we need to have a background check and know the possible risks and benefits If it what we can be able to manage before deciding to get involved, cryptocurrency can be risky too especially shitcoins and meme coins, Bitcoin is less riskier when talking about risk in cryptocurrency.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?
by
Shineup
on 25/08/2025, 20:47:58 UTC
it is also better to choose DCA strategy, because if someone buys Bitcoin with a lump sum, then later if the price of Bitcoin decreases a little, he may regret it, so DCA strategy should be chosen to buy at an average price.

I think the idea of lump summing is basically dependent on the level of income of the individual or investor. And yes, If you have the income to lump sum I don’t think the idea is wrong to accumulate bitcoin and hodl. The DCA strategy is good, and so is lump sum. The idea is to buy and hodl for a long term goal and sometimes you feel like to buy in bulk and keep rather then buying little by little on weekly or monthly basis due to the fear that if the money gets to remain with you, you might use it for other things that are not really worth it so it’s better you use that money to lump sum and hold. Getting emotional about the market is most common among traders, weather they are DCAing or lump summing.
DCA is much better than lump sum. It can be seen that if someone invests a lot of money in Bitcoin at once, some problems can arise. First of all, the person who is investing a lot of money at once takes a long time to invest that money. Maybe many people do not have any other money saved apart from this money. Then if someone invests a lot of money in Bitcoin at once. After that, if he faces any major danger, such as a lot of money for his or her family's member treatment but he does not have it, then he will be forced to sell his Bitcoin holdings. The price of Bitcoin tends to rise and fall a lot. It can be seen that sometimes the price decreases or increases by more than 30% to 40% very quickly. As a result, the risk in lump sum investment is very high. So if the investment is not made at the right time, then a lot of losses may have to be faced. For example, at the end of 2021, the price of Bitcoin reached ATH around $66,000. Then in 2022 and 2023 , the price was around aprox $20,000 and in 2024 it become higher than the price in 2021. So if someone had invested a lot of money at the ATH price of 2021, he would have been facing a lot of losses for a long time. But at the same time, those who had been investing through DCA for a long time were able to buy a lot of Bitcoin at a low price when the price fell in 2022 and 2023. As a result, the profits of those who followed their DCA were relatively high. Another advantage of DCA method investing is that there is peace of mind. There is no mental instability when the price falls, they continue to hold Bitcoin regularly according to their convenience. Now, due to the increase in the popularity of Bitcoin, everyone, poor ,middle class and rich, is showing a lot of interest in Bitcoin. So the most advantageous way for everyone is to follow DCA and invest for a long time through discretionary income. If an emergency fund and a reserve fund can be formed side by side, then future financial problems can be solved. There is no point in taking additional risks, including creating mental instability by investing in lump sums.

While am trying to understand everything you are saying, I think there is a reason while discretionary income discussion is all over the place and if the true meaning is what we are all looking out for in Bitcoin investment then there is no additional risks or any mental instability by investing in Bitcoin through the Lump sum because both the lump sum money and the dca must come from a discretionary income. Having Bitcoin and increase size of your Bitcoin and to hold for long should be the must concern and not even the strategies, more than 90 percent population can not afford to buy Bitcoin in the lump sum way so the dca strategy is still important for the over population.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Invest what you can; Not what you can afford to lose.
by
Shineup
on 23/08/2025, 21:36:08 UTC
Investing clearly requires risk. So if you can invest what you can afford to lose, that’s fine. But if you can invest more than what you can afford to lose, much better, because that only means you are attracting excellent returns when your investment pays off. And in an investment like bitcoin where hodling alone guarantees secured profits, seeing bitcoin price is still capable to reach its new all time high, then it’s never a waste of time and money if you can invest even on an amount you can’t afford losing.

Your advice of investing an amount you can't afford to lose is not suitable for me and I don't think is reasonable owing to the fact that the Bitcoin investment is not completely risk free and investing an amount you can't afford to lose means that you are investing above your risk which can cause emotional traumatization and anxiety, no body can ever stay calm with the Bitcoin ups and downs if they invested an amount that they can't afford to lose, invest what you can afford to lose to enable you stay calmly and watch the investment grow and that isy opinion on this.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Italian League Prediction Thread (Serie A)
by
Shineup
on 22/08/2025, 12:44:30 UTC
AC Milan to welcome Victor Boniface is a good signing for them cos they also were lacking in the center forward position, they only had Santi Gimenez and Noah Okafor who is more of a winger than a striker so having a Victor Boniface to the team is a good addition. Hopefully we get to see the Victor Boniface we saw at Union St Gilloise or his first season at Leverkusen.
I really didn't expect Victor Boniface to leave Leverkusen. It's a shame. However, from AC Milan's perspective, they were quite successful in securing a center forward. So far, AC Milan only has Santiago Gimenez as their mainstay center-forward.

With a value of €40 million, Boniface certainly has the skills to strengthen AC Milan's attack. Victor Boniface is still very productive, at only 24 years old. What's next? Let's see how he performed and contributed throughout last season at Leverkusen:

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/08/22/UZTSog.png
Source: Victor Boniface
Hmm Victor Boniface to AC Milan is good news to him if I where to be Victor Boniface I won't think twice to move to AC Milan as Erik Ten Hang will not only kill Bayern Leverkusen but also kill the players career, with Victor Boniface on that team I'm sure AC Milan will do more better than they have done few seasons past, Victor Boniface has all it takes to play there, he's good at finishing he's got some pretty good skills, and he's record at Bayern Leverkusen isn't bad, I'm sure he will certainly do great job at the team, now my concern is if Victor Boniface should leave Bayern Leverkusen who then will play for then, with that clueless coach I'm already feeling for them.