Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 36 results by Shy_Bladder
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] 🔥 SMARTX 🔥 MINING BLOCKCHAIN-DAG | WECHAT TEAM | 31% TOKEN GIVEAWAY
by
Shy_Bladder
on 26/08/2019, 22:04:56 UTC
Hey. Will you guys release a detailed whitepaper soon? the current one is a little hazy.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 27/12/2017, 04:25:45 UTC
there is a slack link on vtorrent.org
The development is happening in private repos so the github is pretty dead as of now. However, when the project gains traction after full release -- everything will be open sourced
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 15/12/2017, 17:56:39 UTC
does anyone have the invite link for the slack?

edit: nvm, found it

oh you did?

 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes mind sharing

Sharing is caring I've been told: https://vtr11.herokuapp.com

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 15/12/2017, 00:54:15 UTC
does anyone have the invite link for the slack?

edit: nvm, found it
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 08/12/2017, 14:00:20 UTC
Still nothing on torrents ? Can anyone confirm there's an actual product behind 1 printscreen ?

As of now there is no proof, code or even a screenshot or working torrent functionality.

The twitter post by the dev's account (which we can assume wasn't compromised along with his Bitcointalk account) is the first 'official' communication in many, many months.


Are you still holding?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 08/12/2017, 04:19:21 UTC
Guess this explains all the accumulation throughout the summer and early fall - devs and his friends stacking up for the moonshot
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 08/12/2017, 04:11:45 UTC
holy shit, we might actually be set for a 100x ride.
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: chainz.cryptoID.info - Alternative Blockchain Explorers
by
Shy_Bladder
on 19/11/2017, 01:43:35 UTC
Hey guys, may I ask what timezone is used for the timestamps in your stratis block explorer?
Post
Topic
Board MultiBit
Re: Multibit HD - password not working - how to recover both btc and trx history?
by
Shy_Bladder
on 04/10/2017, 11:04:56 UTC
thank you, that makes everything much easier. I'll try it when I get back from work later today.
Post
Topic
Board MultiBit
Multibit HD - password not working - how to recover both btc and trx history?
by
Shy_Bladder
on 02/10/2017, 23:10:40 UTC
Hey, due to the password bug I'm unable to log into my multibit HD. I have the backup words though. I have seen that a common advice in order to recover the bitcoins is to download the breadwallet and generate a wallet there using the multibit HD backup words. However, due to tax purposes I would like recover my transaction history as well. Is this possible at all? I have the payments.aes file stored on my hard disk btw, but since it is encrypted with the password that doesn't work I can't open it.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 29/08/2017, 01:02:08 UTC
it's pretty obvious what is happening here. The coin has had these random spikes for months but overall the price has fallen. What we're seeing is the coin supply changing hands from weak holders to the dev and his friends. Dev is purposely trying to make the coin look like vaperware to get the price to fall so he can accumulate (remember, he didn't have any ico). Every now and then he spikes the price to get rid of bagholders (the above poster is a perfect example of how this tactic works). Rinse and repeat until they've got enough coins to get insanely rich when they drop the torrent functionality.

Could well be true, but they've had over 2 years to accumulate at much lower prices and they hold a 3% premine. Also, if the coin is to have any success once torrents are dropped there needs to be some kind of distribution of the coin. If they were looking at getting rich quickly they could have pumped it earlier.

Quote
Could well be true, but they've had over 2 years to accumulate at much lower prices
Who says he hasn't been accumulating since the beginning? What matters is if he is done accumulating or not. He may be done or he may not be done (my theory being the latter). More specifically, I think he has been steadily accumulating since the birth of the project with a specific goal in mind in terms of coin supply percentage. When the prices of literally all blockchain projects exploded in March (thus including the price of vTorrent) it suddenly became a lot more expensive to accumulate. As such, to be able to keep accumulating as cheap as possible the only rational thing to do would be to make the price fall which obviously is most effectively achieved by making people lose trust in the project.

Now, one could always counter that if the dev wants to accumulate as cheaply as possible he would be better of just refraining from communicating at all in the first place. However, this would only be sensible if it wasn't for the fact that he needs some sort of community to operate nodes, report bugs etc. In other words, he needs to maintain a delicate balance between having just enough followers to accomplish the former and just enough disinterest in the project to accomplish the goal of accumulating cheap. When you look at his posting history you'll see how he balances this act by throwing just enough bones to maintain a few loyal followers. He has never been more quite than the last months which makes sense due to the higher prices which he needs to get down.

Quote
they hold a 3% premine
That would be a valid argument against my theory if you believe the dev would be happy with only 3% of the coin supply. Why would he be satisfied with 3% if he could have 25%, 35% or some other arbitrary and fairly large percentage of the supply knowing he will deliver a killer app that will yield him a 100x - 1000x ++ roi? In other words, why only become somewhat rich when you can get filthy pimping on yacht with models all day rich. It's just common sense.

Quote
If they were looking at getting rich quickly they could have pumped it earlier.
This also boils down to common sense. If the dev had pumped it earlier he would only had become somewhat rich. Let's say he wanted to pump it last year, what grounds would he pump it on? He most likely did not have a fully working product ready at that time so he would have had to  post a video of some half working torrent functionality. Well, maybe it would pump the price 10x (remember, market conditions were totally different just a few months ago), but the liquidity would probably be low and the pump would not sustain for a long time. Thus, his roi would not have been that great. Also, a consequence would be a price floor permanently higher than before the pump due to increased confidence in the project which in turn would mean that future accumulation would be more expensive.  

Now let's assume he follows my theory. He keeps the price low all the time, accumulates as much as possible. When he is done he drops torrent functionality and price quickly 100x's with the medium to long term possibility of at least 1000x ++ with sustained liquidity. In other words, he will be able to sell off as much as he wants for at least 100x.

Quote
Also, if the coin is to have any success once torrents are dropped there needs to be some kind of distribution of the coin.
I agree with you on this one. However, I don't see how accumulation NOW with the consequence of decreased distribution equals low distribution AFTER he drops torrent functionality. Imagine when he drops it. Price will explode and those few people owning coins will sell all the way up thus increasing distribution again. The higher the price goes, the more of the initial holders will sell their coins and make for greater distribution. And the same goes for the dev. If he wants to be rich he actually has to start selling at some point.

Honestly, it all boils down to the fact that paid seeding is THE blockchain killer app (at least top 3). It will create an easily available market for the almost infinite amount of long tail content. We're talking a huuuge hidden demand getting fullfilled. It will also create a market for faster downloads. It will benefit content creators in numerous ways, especially musicians: Much cheaper distribution of their art (they keep all the revenue in contrast to current content providers who take up to 30%), they get instant and undiluted payouts in contrast to the current scheme where greedy publishers take a laarge cut and delay the payouts for weeks, they get exposed to a global audience in contrast to current providers and their geographical restrictions, they don't have to work through expensive aggregators, etc etc.

The shit will sell itself when it drops and the dev knows this perfectly well. He doesn't need to cater to his community beyond the minimal effort required to keep the network running. When it drops it will begin living its own life, just like bitcoin did, but the difference being that the demand for this coin will be highly organic pretty early due to the supply and demand gaps in various areas waiting to get bridged as explained above.




Just to be clear I'm not trying to disprove anything here as I think your theory is reasonable.

But -

Most of the supply could have been bought with less than 10 BTC over the last 2 years (I think it's unlikely they missed this window and are now spending 100's of BTC for the equivalent bag). The communication has been shitty for a very long time, so if your theory is correct this suggest they have been playing this game for a very long time. Also, most of the big volume (or "accumulation") was happening at much higher prices than we are at now.

Furthermore, if your theory is correct then surely they would have accumulated at least 20% of total supply by now (if not they are terrible at this). So, at what point do they have enough? You would expect they would want to take advantage of market hype for a x1000 pump?

An alternative theory is that they are working full time and only doing this on the side as a hobby project. They have no communicative skills and simply cbf keeping us in the loop.

But who knows - one thing is for sure it will be a game changer if he delivers.


yes good points, and yes we can agree on your last point for sure:)
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 28/08/2017, 07:36:29 UTC
it's pretty obvious what is happening here. The coin has had these random spikes for months but overall the price has fallen. What we're seeing is the coin supply changing hands from weak holders to the dev and his friends. Dev is purposely trying to make the coin look like vaperware to get the price to fall so he can accumulate (remember, he didn't have any ico). Every now and then he spikes the price to get rid of bagholders (the above poster is a perfect example of how this tactic works). Rinse and repeat until they've got enough coins to get insanely rich when they drop the torrent functionality.

Could well be true, but they've had over 2 years to accumulate at much lower prices and they hold a 3% premine. Also, if the coin is to have any success once torrents are dropped there needs to be some kind of distribution of the coin. If they were looking at getting rich quickly they could have pumped it earlier.

Quote
Could well be true, but they've had over 2 years to accumulate at much lower prices
Who says he hasn't been accumulating since the beginning? What matters is if he is done accumulating or not. He may be done or he may not be done (my theory being the latter). More specifically, I think he has been steadily accumulating since the birth of the project with a specific goal in mind in terms of coin supply percentage. When the prices of literally all blockchain projects exploded in March (thus including the price of vTorrent) it suddenly became a lot more expensive to accumulate. As such, to be able to keep accumulating as cheap as possible the only rational thing to do would be to make the price fall which obviously is most effectively achieved by making people lose trust in the project.

Now, one could always counter that if the dev wants to accumulate as cheaply as possible he would be better of just refraining from communicating at all in the first place. However, this would only be sensible if it wasn't for the fact that he needs some sort of community to operate nodes, report bugs etc. In other words, he needs to maintain a delicate balance between having just enough followers to accomplish the former and just enough disinterest in the project to accomplish the goal of accumulating cheap. When you look at his posting history you'll see how he balances this act by throwing just enough bones to maintain a few loyal followers. He has never been more quite than the last months which makes sense due to the higher prices which he needs to get down.

Quote
they hold a 3% premine
That would be a valid argument against my theory if you believe the dev would be happy with only 3% of the coin supply. Why would he be satisfied with 3% if he could have 25%, 35% or some other arbitrary and fairly large percentage of the supply knowing he will deliver a killer app that will yield him a 100x - 1000x ++ roi? In other words, why only become somewhat rich when you can get filthy pimping on yacht with models all day rich. It's just common sense.

Quote
If they were looking at getting rich quickly they could have pumped it earlier.
This also boils down to common sense. If the dev had pumped it earlier he would only had become somewhat rich. Let's say he wanted to pump it last year, what grounds would he pump it on? He most likely did not have a fully working product ready at that time so he would have had to  post a video of some half working torrent functionality. Well, maybe it would pump the price 10x (remember, market conditions were totally different just a few months ago), but the liquidity would probably be low and the pump would not sustain for a long time. Thus, his roi would not have been that great. Also, a consequence would be a price floor permanently higher than before the pump due to increased confidence in the project which in turn would mean that future accumulation would be more expensive.  

Now let's assume he follows my theory. He keeps the price low all the time, accumulates as much as possible. When he is done he drops torrent functionality and price quickly 100x's with the medium to long term possibility of at least 1000x ++ with sustained liquidity. In other words, he will be able to sell off as much as he wants for at least 100x.

Quote
Also, if the coin is to have any success once torrents are dropped there needs to be some kind of distribution of the coin.
I agree with you on this one. However, I don't see how accumulation NOW with the consequence of decreased distribution equals low distribution AFTER he drops torrent functionality. Imagine when he drops it. Price will explode and those few people owning coins will sell all the way up thus increasing distribution again. The higher the price goes, the more of the initial holders will sell their coins and make for greater distribution. And the same goes for the dev. If he wants to be rich he actually has to start selling at some point.

Honestly, it all boils down to the fact that paid seeding is THE blockchain killer app (at least top 3). It will create an easily available market for the almost infinite amount of long tail content. We're talking a huuuge hidden demand getting fullfilled. It will also create a market for faster downloads. It will benefit content creators in numerous ways, especially musicians: Much cheaper distribution of their art (they keep all the revenue in contrast to current content providers who take up to 30%), they get instant and undiluted payouts in contrast to the current scheme where greedy publishers take a laarge cut and delay the payouts for weeks, they get exposed to a global audience in contrast to current providers and their geographical restrictions, they don't have to work through expensive aggregators, etc etc.

The shit will sell itself when it drops and the dev knows this perfectly well. He doesn't need to cater to his community beyond the minimal effort required to keep the network running. When it drops it will begin living its own life, just like bitcoin did, but the difference being that the demand for this coin will be highly organic pretty early due to the supply and demand gaps in various areas waiting to get bridged as explained above.


Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 27/08/2017, 05:33:36 UTC
it's pretty obvious what is happening here. The coin has had these random spikes for months but overall the price has fallen. What we're seeing is the coin supply changing hands from weak holders to the dev and his friends. Dev is purposely trying to make the coin look like vaperware to get the price to fall so he can accumulate (remember, he didn't have any ico). Every now and then he spikes the price to get rid of bagholders (the above poster is a perfect example of how this tactic works). Rinse and repeat until they've got enough coins to get insanely rich when they drop the torrent functionality.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
by
Shy_Bladder
on 17/04/2017, 18:14:15 UTC
can someone please ask the developers to add the slack invite in the OP. Don't they want new investors?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
by
Shy_Bladder
on 17/04/2017, 08:28:39 UTC
This project looks great but you guys need a slack invite on the front page.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 23/02/2017, 12:39:43 UTC
^^^ bump

Lol, you don't expect the devs two answer do you?

No.

I think if you look at GitHub, you can pretty much work out what's coming. In which order features will be released is a different issue.

But vTorrent is exceptionally feature rich compared to just about every coin out there right now. I do mean, every coin.

What do you see that is coming?  I'm looking at the GitHub and don't "see" what you see.

Code:


                
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 22/02/2017, 21:42:52 UTC
Hey.
Does anyone know what upgrades the hardfork in December brought?
Also, has Tor and i2p support been integrated yet?
I saw some mentions about multisigs, has that been implemented or is it still on the roadmap?
Last, the client has support for ring signatures and stealth addresses right? If so, can they be used now or are there still tweaks that needs to be done before they are fully functional?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex
by
Shy_Bladder
on 16/02/2017, 21:02:48 UTC
what is the key advantage of this type of thing runing on the [Suspicious link removed]pared to uTorrent and stuff like that?


here you go

...

The riot chat feature looks cool enough- but how exactly is the torrent feature in VTR supposed to work?

Think uTorrent meets Monero, they get married and end up living together. That get's you on to the first page.

Then add Anon Social Network (Riot)
Then add basic chat (one off deals and transactions)
Then add MultiSig (Monero can't do that yet)
Then add 2FA to protect your wallet if you leave it open all the time
Then add Tor and I2P support
Then add classifieds market
Then add mobile support

That gets you to the same page as our expectations for the project over 2017.

Which of those points have been confirmed by the dev? I know he has talked about storing magnet links in the blockchain but nothing about a classified market yet? Would love to be wrong though. Also do you know if he has talked about making a lite client available in the future? I think that is important for mass adoption.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: | ANN | Espers [ESP] | New Algo | New Features In Development | Reverse-ICO |
by
Shy_Bladder
on 16/02/2017, 08:34:58 UTC
If someone wants to sell coins OTC, message me your preferred price and how much you want to sell, and if we agree we find an escrow and make the deal.

Why don't you use the exchange?

Low liquidity. Will take a long time to buy in at the price I want.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: | ANN | Espers [ESP] | New Algo | New Features In Development | Reverse-ICO |
by
Shy_Bladder
on 15/02/2017, 16:44:37 UTC
If someone wants to sell coins OTC, message me your preferred price and how much you want to sell, and if we agree we find an escrow and make the deal.