2. No way normal. I'm verified at Bit-z, I have 2FA and I made some small withdrawals without problem... until they want to took my monday airdrop. They frozen my withdrawal for more than 48h without notice, and when I contacted them they told me to send again a picture of my nice face holding my ID.

They kept in their pockets more than 400 dollars of my monday airdrop and charged me 70 dollars for that withdrawal... that they finally made with a nice e-mail sentence "[...] please pay attention to your assets".

Of course they completely ignored my e-mail when I claimed my 400 dollars (12 BTX).

So... NORMAL ? I'm sorry but NO

Well... they took 12 BTX from my monday airdrop. That was more than USD 400 at the time.

I'm a Level 3 verified member but they managed to froze my 400 BTX withdrawal for more than 48h, without a single communication. I had to contact them via e-mail and send them AGAIN a picture of myself holding my ID to clear the transaction.

Of course they ignored my e-mail when I politely asked them for my 12 BTX.

And for this wonderful withdrawal service they also charged me USD 70 (2 BTX at the time).

It seems that HITBTC is having withdrawal delays, but I will give them a try and from now on I will avoid Bit-z.

Cryptopia worked fine for me for small amounts.

It's not about going toe to toe, this is about correct and real information. Bitcore deserves to be listed there correctly and we must try it the hardest we can. But in the last case, I even prefer that CMC remove Bitcore from their listings than to be there with numbers that cheat new Bitcore members, coming here always asking about this issue because they don't understand the wrong CMC numbers.

With the calculation method that CMC is currently using with Bitcore, it's impossible for any coin to be listed in high positions (not even for Bitcoin !).

Something is shady at CMC regarding this. This year there were coins that appeared in their TOP 20 from nowhere with most part of the coins not distributed, and big big chunks in the hands of the creators... And now they are arguing against Bitcore real numbers ? mmmm....

The Bitcore numbers in CMC were listed correctly for some hours and then they changed them. Why ? Who was the person/group that told them to change Bitcore numbers ? Something shady happened there...

It is what it is: Option 1

Sooner or later a lot of that coins will appear in the market, affecting the market numbers (price, volumes...). Any other option is absurd.

I don't think we have to "obey" CMC ... Who are they ? To me they are acting this way due some hidden interests, unknown for the rest us. What we have to do is to listen the BitCore community.

At the end, if CMC doesn't want to be rational, we can choose to obey or to adapt ourselves to the new situation considering more options, including a Bitcore fork to undo transactions for unclaimed BTC coins returning them to circulation again (via more airdrops, or any other method) to satisfy these new CMC rules "made expressly for us".

I'm not in crypto to obey arbitrary decissions from third parties, so it should be a BitCore community and developers decission.

I think the reason is pretty obvious. There is no "decrease", just returning to the same levels that BTX was before the weekly airdrops started. Not just the price is returning, but also the volume.

All that talk "against" the BTX rich people ("split-cheater", really ?), and modification of rules in favor of those that only want "free" coins but don't want to buy a single BTX with their cash, is making the pricing drop. For those that can read between lines it's clear that some "riches"  stopped buying BTX (perhaps also started selling some), and with fewer people buying and miners selling, the price drops.

This behaviour can be easily viewed checking the BTX market graphs, that show us a BIG increase in BTX volume and price when the weekly airdrop rules motivated the "riches" to buy and compete against them. It seems to me that most of the BTX "riches" are silent buyers and don't want to write posts or entering discussions here, but at the end, those "riches" were making every BTX holder also richer.

We can discuss about what is fair o not, ethical or unethical, but those are the facts that the market is showing us (if we want to understand them). It's up to us (the BTX community and devs) to decide the fate of the coin, but I see here a bit of the old axiom capitalism-comunism.

I don't undertand why so many posts against the BTX riches (envy ?) because as far as I understand, those that are rich are because they paid for the BTX and risk their money doing that. It's almost impossible to be a BTX rich only linking BTC because even if you have 100 BTC (almost $300,000 - a nice amount), that only gives you 100 BTX which is about $170 at today prices. So, there are no free BTX "riches"; the riches are those that are risking their capital supporting this coin. All my respect and thanks to them.

My opinion is that we need to motivate the people to buy the coin, and if the "whales" and "riches" can and want to do it, that will be in benefit of all BTX holders. Not to mention that higher market capitalization and higher volumes also benefits the coin to get listed in bigger exchanges.