Ninjastic
Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 60 results by SixLitr
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 17/07/2019, 22:04:29 UTC
The HT Assist was in fact enabled, and C1E was disabled, swapped those.

Result of TurionPowerControl:
Code:
Main processor is Family 15h (Bulldozer/Interlagos/Valencia) Processor
        Family: 0xf             Model: 0x1              Stepping: 0x2
        Extended Family: 0x15   Extended Model: 0x1
        Package Type: 0x3       BrandId: 0x0
Machine has 8 nodes
Processor has 8 cores
Processor has 8 p-states
Processor has 2 boost states

Power States table:
-- Node: 0 Core 0
core 0 pstate 0 (pb0) - En:1 VID:19 FID:16 DID:0.00 Freq:3200 VCore:1.3125
core 0 pstate 1 (pb1) - En:1 VID:33 FID:10 DID:0.00 Freq:2600 VCore:1.1375
core 0 pstate 2 (p0) - En:1 VID:39 FID:7 DID:0.00 Freq:2300 VCore:1.0625
core 0 pstate 3 (p1) - En:1 VID:41 FID:5 DID:0.00 Freq:2100 VCore:1.0375
core 0 pstate 4 (p2) - En:1 VID:44 FID:2 DID:0.00 Freq:1800 VCore:1.0000
core 0 pstate 5 (p3) - En:1 VID:47 FID:0 DID:0.00 Freq:1600 VCore:0.9625
core 0 pstate 6 (p4) - En:1 VID:50 FID:12 DID:1.00 Freq:1400 VCore:0.9250
core 0 pstate 7 (p5) - En:0 VID:0 FID:0 DID:0.00 Freq:1600 VCore:1.5500

I went ahead and changed the power control from 6 to 1 successfully and results for all 4 CPUs are [9073H/s]

Code:
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1318.61 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1313.64 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1313.27 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1314.09 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1312.53 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1303.8 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 604.595 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 596.604 hashes per second

A performance increase to be sure for the first 3 CPUs, however I suspect there may be some issues with that last CPU, or possibly a memory placement/configuration issue.

Running the test again now at psmax 6 results a slightly higher performance overall, simply because that last CPU isn't reporting so low [9266H/s]

Code:
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1188.97 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1184.08 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1183.85 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1184.04 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1183.31 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1178.12 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1088.27 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1078.13 hashes per second
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 17/07/2019, 00:32:23 UTC
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
Quote
Does that mean that "HT assist" was already disabled in the BIOS?

I completely forgot to check this honestly - the R&D facility is 30min away so I will have to head back tomorrow and check this setting, most of the time I am just remoting into these servers. Based on the results below I think this may in fact be the culprit to that low hash rate on the last CPU.

Quote
I have discovered that TurionPowerControl binary can be downloaded here:

https://github.com/mh0rst/turionpowercontrol/releases

Just download the tpc-0.44-rc2.tar.gz file (or tpc-0.44-rc2.zip) and unzip it.

In the tpc-0.44-rc2/bin/Ubuntu-amd64 folder you will see the TurionPowerControl binary


I found that yesterday and still didn't make a difference on 18LTS unfortunately.


And now for the latest update:  I went ahead and put 16LTS on a USB thumb drive (great idea don't know why I didn't think of it sooner) BUT I accidentally flashed the image to the hard drive array instead of booting off the USB, oh well, that's what these servers are for right now. So now I can compare 16 vs 18 head to head if there are any subtle differences in OS versions, but I digress.

I ran the baseline test again with all 4 CPUs and got slightly better results [9388H/s] - I even went back after and set psmax to 6 again to check and got [9395H/s] so it's fairly consistent and repeatable.

Code:
seq 0 7 | xargs -P 0 -I node numactl -N node ./randomx-benchmark --mine --largePages --jit --nonces 100000 --init 8 --threads 8
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2737 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2907 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2882 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.3152 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.3287 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.342 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 11.3486 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.3483 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1220.71 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1219.81 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1218.37 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1217.59 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1217.56 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1216.92 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1043.43 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1038.67 hashes per second

I then ran the same 4 CPU test with TurionPowerControl settings at Processor Maximum PState: 1 and it got worse [8756H/s]

Code:
seq 0 7 | xargs -P 0 -I node numactl -N node ./randomx-benchmark --mine --largePages --jit --nonces 100000 --init 8 --threads 8
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6503 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6667 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6677 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6707 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6735 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6835 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6931 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6934 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1310.76 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1309.99 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1310.33 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1309.63 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1305.83 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1305.44 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 454.509 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 454.231 hashes per second

And finally I ran the same 4 CPU test at psmax 1 with only 7 VM's and got this [8612H/s]

Code:
seq 0 7 | xargs -P 0 -I node numactl -N node ./randomx-benchmark --mine --largePages --jit --nonces 100000 --init 8 --threads 7
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6593 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6523 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6576 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6864 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6983 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 10.6983 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 13.1069 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 13.1296 s
Initializing 7 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1267.87 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1267.82 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1267.58 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1267.42 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1264.88 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1258.68 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 521.747 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 501.978 hashes per second
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 16/07/2019, 17:58:28 UTC
@MinersRus

Unfortunately no, I am unable to improve that last processor but I am still working on things. No luck getting TurionPowerControl working either. Will update if I get anything different (positive or negative). If anyone reading has any ideas on how to get Turion installed on Ubuntu 18 please let me know  Wink - I'd hate to have to downgrade these servers to 16, but if I have to I will to see if anything changes.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 15/07/2019, 18:23:24 UTC
I have all the updates applied and that includes build-essential. No luck and I am contemplating re-installing with Ubuntu 16LTS just to see if that's the case. TurionPowerControl hasn't been updated in years.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 15/07/2019, 17:40:21 UTC
I just double-checked and I had these R815's updated to Ubuntu 18 LTS, that might be why I'm having issues.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 15/07/2019, 17:13:18 UTC
Having some issues installing Turion for some reason and I can't seem to find the solution, any ideas?

Code:
g++ -O2   -MMD -MF obj/x86_64/.Brazos.d -MT obj/x86_64/Brazos.o -c -o obj/x86_64/Brazos.o Brazos.cpp
g++ -O2   -MMD -MF obj/x86_64/.Llano.d -MT obj/x86_64/Llano.o -c -o obj/x86_64/Llano.o Llano.cpp
g++ -O2   -MMD -MF obj/x86_64/.Interlagos.d -MT obj/x86_64/Interlagos.o -c -o obj/x86_64/Interlagos.o Interlagos.cpp
g++ -O2   -MMD -MF obj/x86_64/.MSRObject.d -MT obj/x86_64/MSRObject.o -c -o obj/x86_64/MSRObject.o MSRObject.cpp
g++ -O2   -MMD -MF obj/x86_64/.MSVC_Round.d -MT obj/x86_64/MSVC_Round.o -c -o obj/x86_64/MSVC_Round.o MSVC_Round.cpp
In file included from MSVC_Round.cpp:1:0:
MSVC_Round.h:5:17: error: ‘int round(float)’ conflicts with a previous declaration
 int round (float);
                 ^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/7/math.h:36:0,
                 from MSVC_Round.h:3,
                 from MSVC_Round.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/7/cmath:1771:3: note: previous declaration ‘constexpr float std::round(float)’
   round(float __x)
   ^~~~~
Makefile:62: recipe for target 'obj/x86_64/MSVC_Round.o' failed
make: *** [obj/x86_64/MSVC_Round.o] Error 1

Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 15/07/2019, 16:40:11 UTC
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
Results from testing (running hugepages at 9600 if that matters). Some interesting results testing all 4 CPUs as I noticed the last couple virtual machines slowed down considerably, dropping to 7 threads didn't help and reduced the overall score.

Single CPU [2435h/s]
Code:
seq 0 1 | xargs -P 0 -I node numactl -N node ./randomx-benchmark --mine --largePages --jit --nonces 10000 --init 8 --threads 8
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
Memory initialized in 11.186 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 11.1881 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (10000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (10000 nonces) ...
Calculated result: 3412fd710459cb4e710e2f72760f632f4f00a0463ab02dbdd7dae176aeb1ccc2
Performance: 1218.28 hashes per second
Calculated result: 3412fd710459cb4e710e2f72760f632f4f00a0463ab02dbdd7dae176aeb1ccc2
Performance: 1217.59 hashes per second

Dual CPU [4875h/s]
Code:
seq 0 3 | xargs -P 0 -I node numactl -N node ./randomx-benchmark --mine --largePages --jit --nonces 10000 --init 8 --threads 8
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
Memory initialized in 11.192 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (10000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2044 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (10000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2342 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (10000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2376 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (10000 nonces) ...
Calculated result: 3412fd710459cb4e710e2f72760f632f4f00a0463ab02dbdd7dae176aeb1ccc2
Performance: 1222.54 hashes per second
Calculated result: 3412fd710459cb4e710e2f72760f632f4f00a0463ab02dbdd7dae176aeb1ccc2
Performance: 1219.92 hashes per second
Calculated result: 3412fd710459cb4e710e2f72760f632f4f00a0463ab02dbdd7dae176aeb1ccc2
Performance: 1221.46 hashes per second
Calculated result: 3412fd710459cb4e710e2f72760f632f4f00a0463ab02dbdd7dae176aeb1ccc2
Performance: 1213.3 hashes per second

Quad CPU [8836h/s]
Code:
seq 0 7 | xargs -P 0 -I node numactl -N node ./randomx-benchmark --mine --largePages --jit --nonces 100000 --init 8 --threads 8
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
RandomX benchmark v1.0.4
 - full memory mode (2080 MiB)
 - JIT compiled mode
 - hardware AES mode
 - large pages mode
Initializing (8 threads) ...
Memory initialized in 11.181 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2132 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2208 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2227 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2278 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 11.2378 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 19.4071 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Memory initialized in 19.4136 s
Initializing 8 virtual machine(s) ...
Running benchmark (100000 nonces) ...
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1219.7 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1217.48 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1216.08 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1215.29 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1213.56 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 1212.34 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 773.804 hashes per second
Calculated result: d6660144e9a2e68bf47d7cc8afc206672e72f82dfff69fe0d974531e85f7504f
Performance: 771.625 hashes per second
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Building Cheap Miners : My "Secret"
by
SixLitr
on 15/07/2019, 16:06:32 UTC
I am "the friend" - and after reading everything I will be performing some more tests to help provide a more accurate representation of the servers I have ( 2 x R815's each with 64GB of RAM and 4 x Opteron  6276 running Ubuntu 16).

Quick question, as I am learning my way around "server CPU" mining and relatively new to this (been GPU mining for years). How do I test all 4 CPU's together, in addition to a single and dual for comparison? (Just posting the commands is fine, but I prefer to also learn what they do and why/how to use them).  Thanks!
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [POOL] ⚒️BlockFoundry⚒️ YiiMP MultiPool [0.25%] & Cryptonight [0.1%-0.5%]
by
SixLitr
on 13/04/2019, 15:44:22 UTC
*** NEW POOLS ADDED ***


We have added Conceal to The Block Foundry family: https://conceal.blockfoundry.org - Welcome!

We have added Monero to The Block Foundry family: https://monero.blockfoundry.org - Welcome!

We have added X-Cash to The Block Foundry family: https://xcash.blockfoundry.org - Welcome!

Drop into our Discord if you have any questions or need help configuring your miners.

Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [POOL] ⚒️BlockFoundry⚒️ YiiMP MultiPool [0.25%] & Cryptonight [0.2%-0.5%]
by
SixLitr
on 26/01/2019, 21:51:06 UTC
***POOL UPDATE ***

Our Masari [MSR] pool is now SECOR Uncle Mining ready!  Come on board and try out the new uncle mining system - no more lost payouts to orphan blocks!

Please note that the algorithm has changed to CN Fast v2.
At this time only XMRig, SRBminer, and CastXMR support this algorithm; make sure to update your miners accordingly.

Check out the pool here: https://masari.blockfoundry.org




Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [POOL] ⚒️BlockFoundry⚒️ YiiMP MultiPool [0.25%] & Cryptonight [0.2%-0.5%]
by
SixLitr
on 02/01/2019, 16:33:13 UTC
***POOL UPDATE ***

All our Cryptonight pools have had a face lift and some back-end restructuring for more security and efficiency. Come check it out and mine with The Block Foundry!

We are also running a FREE GPU Giveaway contest for the month of January as a way of saying thank you to all our miners, and to welcome new miners to the community as we continue to grow.

Check out the details here: https://blockfoundry.org/crypto-mining-contest-free-gpu-giveaway/




Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Guncoin(GUN) - New GUN Core V1.5.2 Released - Mandatory Upgrade
by
SixLitr
on 06/12/2018, 04:38:28 UTC

Guncoin [GUN] Pool Added!

https://multipool.blockfoundry.org



Standard Configuration
Code:
-a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4235 -u -p c=GUN
Configuration with RigNames
Code:
-a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4235 -u . -p c=GUN

Payment Interval: [3hrs]
Pool Fee: [0.25%]
Server Location: [US]

Discord Support: https://discord.gg/63QKpeb
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [XGCS] xGalaxy Coin - PoW-MN x16r (0.005% Premine) - No Presell
by
SixLitr
on 05/12/2018, 03:11:46 UTC

xGalaxy [XGCS] Pool Added!

https://multipool.blockfoundry.org



Standard Configuration
Code:
-a x16r -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:3638 -u -p c=XGCS
Configuration with RigNames
Code:
-a x16r -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:3638 -u . -p c=XGCS

Payment Interval: [3hrs]
Pool Fee: [0.25%]
Server Location: [US]

Discord Support: https://discord.gg/63QKpeb
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] GPUnion [GUT] PoW | Computing Power Ecosystem | Stop Mining For Nothing!!
by
SixLitr
on 28/11/2018, 04:09:17 UTC

GPUnion Pool Added!

https://multipool.blockfoundry.org



Standard Configuration
Code:
-a x16r -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:3640 -u -p c=GUT
Configuration with RigNames
Code:
-a x16r -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:3640 -u . -p c=GUT

Payment Interval: [6hrs]
Pool Fee: [0.25%]
Server Location: [US]

Discord Support: https://discord.gg/63QKpeb
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]XDNA-Revolution in mining|GPU ONLY HEX algo|Charity Support|NoICO|Cryptopia
by
SixLitr
on 27/11/2018, 06:05:08 UTC
Quote from: TasosRiv on November 26, 2018, 08:20:30 PM
ANNOUNCEMENT

As we promised, this week we releasing our 1st non-blockchain based product and one of the main purpose of our existence –  P2P XDNA Foundation platform!

https://foundation.xdna.io/

From now we transfer it from close alpha to open alpha test and we will improve it with a help of special testers and our precious community

How to help us?
1  Go to platform
2  Test it functionality, find an non-optimized feature
3  Go to #foundation_alpha (discord) and leave your report, also copy it and send to foundation@xdna.io
4  Mention your XDNA wallet and we will send a small reward for helping us improve our platform

We still need to implement lots of features to make this place a real comfort and easy to use.

We prepared a special Platform ROAD MAP – you can view it at foundation home page:

Let me introduce our next steps in 2018:
  • New exchange
  • Paper wallet release
  • Platform optimization from RM
  • 1st half report
  • Legal-entity registration
  • 2 new partners
  • Release of new side blockchain project! Non from XDNA universe, but developed by our team!

Also as mentioned by Vak,
Quote from: Vak on November 26, 2018, 12:07:28 PM
Another way to get rewards for testing:
1. Register on the platform, go through a full verification (not necessarily authentic).
2. Ask for help. Want to raise funds for some kind of purchase? Well, let it be so.
3. When submitting an application, specify the amount not more than 50 XDNA. Watch your application.
4. After collecting funds (and they will be collected) you will receive a reward.

Be strong with XDNA!

This is probably one of the most important reasons why I not only added XDNA to our pools, but I mine it personally. I love to see projects that think outside the box and have goals beyond just making a mine-able coin because everyone else is. Good luck team! Let em know if I can help!
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: My Crypto Stats - Crypto Currency Dashboard
by
SixLitr
on 26/11/2018, 03:44:00 UTC
Hello, happy to start using your website for management. Could you please add the following pools:

https://pools.blockfoundry.org

CNv8
-Graft   graft.blockfoundry.org
-Lethean   lethean.blockfoundry.org

CNHeavy
-Loki   loki.blockfoundry.org
-Ryo   ryo.blockfoundry.org


Also we run a YiiMP pool: https://multipool.blockfoundry.org

x16r
 Gravium (GRV)
 Motion (XMN)
 Ravencoin (RVN)
 xGalaxy (XGCS)
xevan   
 BitSend (BSD)
phi2   
 Luxcoin (LUX)
scrypt   
 Litecoin (LTC)
argon2d-dyn
 Dynamic (DYN)
neoscrypt
 GoByte (GBX)
 Guncoin (GUN)
 Innova (INN)
lyra2z
 Mano (MANO)
 Gincoin (GIN)
 Gentarium (GTM)
hex
 XDNA (XDNA)

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN]Duality Blockchain Solutions: Dynamic(DYN), Sequence(SEQ), HarmonIQ(NoID)
by
SixLitr
on 25/11/2018, 17:47:20 UTC

Dynamic [DYN] Pool Added!

https://multipool.blockfoundry.org



Standard Configuration (SGMiner-DYN GPU)
Code:
-k argon2d -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4239 -u
Configuration with RigNames
Code:
-k argon2d -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4239 -u -p

Payment Interval: [6hrs]
Pool Fee: [0.00%] -  FREE FOR FEB 2019
Server Location: [US]

Discord Support: https://discord.gg/63QKpeb
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ☑☑☑[ANN][BSD] BitSend - online since 2014 - Bittrex - Litebit.eu
by
SixLitr
on 23/11/2018, 19:48:54 UTC

BitSend Pool Added!

https://multipool.blockfoundry.org



Standard Configuration
Code:
-a xevan -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:3739 -u -p c=BSD
Configuration with RigNames
Code:
-a xevan -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:3739 -u . -p c=BSD

Payment Interval: [6hrs]
Pool Fee: [0.25%]
Server Location: [US]

Discord Support: https://discord.gg/63QKpeb
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] GOBYTE [GBX] - Masternodes, PoW, Secure, ASIC Resistance, GoByte Pay
by
SixLitr
on 23/11/2018, 19:39:26 UTC

GoByte Pool Added!

https://multipool.blockfoundry.org



Standard Configuration
Code:
-a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4234 -u -p c=GBX
Configuration with RigNames
Code:
-a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4234 -u . -p c=GBX

Payment Interval: [6hrs]
Pool Fee: [0.25%]
Server Location: [US]

Discord Support: https://discord.gg/63QKpeb
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LAUNCH] GINcoin | One-click masternodes LIVE | Shared MN platform
by
SixLitr
on 23/11/2018, 19:37:12 UTC

Gin Pool Added!

https://multipool.blockfoundry.org



Standard Configuration
Code:
-a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4554 -u -p c=GIN
Configuration with RigNames
Code:
-a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://multipool.blockfoundry.org:4554 -u . -p c=GIN

Payment Interval: [6hrs]
Pool Fee: [0.25%]
Server Location: [US]

Discord Support: https://discord.gg/63QKpeb