Finally got my refund after sending a couple of reminder e-mails. This basically means the project is dead because the team wouldnt refund if they are still planning on releasing the NAT tokens on an Exchange. I advise everyone to do the same.

I don't think the team is acting honest.

They could have set a soft cap and just return investors money.

Now after months they are still trying to figüre out what to do which comes after months of silence.

Is there airdrop for this?

It’s been 3 weeks now since our ICO ended, and due to a lot of work we didn’t have the time to update you with news. So I want to take this as chance to update you.

1. Nametoken’s ICO
Although we weren’t able to collect our “wished” amount, we are very satisfied with the results. We are optimistic that we can build a great domain ecosystem from the funding we received. In the last days of our ICO we gave out a special bonus, which helped us collecting the funds that are needed in order to continue. So, yes: We will continue 😉

2. Upcoming stuff
If you think that an ICO is a lot of work and after that it gets more relaxed, I have to disappoint you. Right now we are building relations with all possible exchange platforms in order to get Nametoken published there. We are very optimistic that we will get placed on a few platforms, so that you can trade your NAT there.
Other than that we are searching for more people for our DEV team in order to work on our prototype. We are planning to present this prototype at the end of January on the Namescon in Las Vegas. Thanks to our Advisor Soeren we receive a platform that helps us spreading the word about Nametoken.

That is all so far. Please be patient. We will update you weekly / biweekly with our progress from now on, so that you are close to the things that we do at Nametoken.

Best Regards,
Jens

I've invested a small amount of 2 LTC, at the time probably worth around $90 to see if this project would actually do anything. This granted me 197 NAT tokens which means it cost me roughly 46cts per token.

I'm now seeing posts of people who ran facebook and twitter "campaigns" during the ICO which should have earned them 8,500 NAT! That would mean roughly $3,800 would be distributed to a lot of people that really haven't put that much effort into it.

If the Nametoken team actually distributes these bounties and if they really have collected a small amount of money from investors the price of 1 NAT will be worthless.

At this point I'd rather have the team to be honest and credit all investors instead of actually coming forth with the NAT on exchanges as a shitcoin (yes, I said it, please prove me wrong).

I just took five minutes out of my life to comment on the whole situation. It would suit the NAT team to do the same.

Specifiek voor België: geen vermogensbelasting of vermogensrendementsheffing, dus het louter bezit van bitcoin moet je niet aangeven.

Moet je de winst bij verkoop aangeven? Hier wordt het een pak onduidelijker: als je de verkoop hebt gerealiseerd als onderdeel van het normaal beheer van een privévermogen, dan hoef je niets aan te geven, aangenomen dat de fiscus akkoord gaat dat bitcoin "portefeuillewaarden" zijn, zoals andere beleggingen (aandelen, obligaties, enz.). Voor dat laatste zijn zeker goeie argumenten, maar voorlopig is het nog een vraagteken. M.i. kan de fiscus je gezien de onduidelijkheid in ieder geval niet straffen als je bitcoin inderdaad als portefeuillewaarden beschouwt en je niets aangeeft omdat je je als een "goed huisvader met bitcoins" hebt gedragen.

Ben je echter een "speculant" - en weeral weet niemand wat dat precies betekent - dan moet je wel belasting betalen @ 33% van je winst.

Tot slot, ben je een day-trader en draait heel je beroepsleven rond het aan- en verkopen van bitcoins, dan zit je met een beroepsinkomen belastbaar tot 50%.

Afdwingbaarheid van dit alles is weer een ander paar mouwen natuurlijk.