We have 15 QRK MN running, the behaviour is different. Some are running without problems, at some it helps to restart at other it comes to "Missing" and we have to wait for 2 hours until we get rewards again.
We also have many other MN of other coins running, where all these problems do not exist.
Please come to a solution and a version that runs without big problems. We accept that updates and changes can cause problems, but with QRK the problem will soon be normal. We thought that version 10.7.3 would solve the problem, but now there are problems again with the new version. So it might be understandable that people are slowly switching from 7.3 to 7.4.
I don't know how the developers designed it
But at present, I can't see the node 7.0/7.2/7.3 in my 7.4 wallet
I think it may need to be upgraded to 7.4 to stay on the main chain
Are you kidding me?
I changed all MN and my wallet to 7.4 less than one hour after the message came that there is a new version 7.4. I already wrote this several times. All MNs are configured the same and have the same peers, they are only in different countries (Europe, Asia and America). With version 7.3 there were hardly any problems, with version 7.4 there are again many problems.
Also from the beginning I only saw a part of my MN in the blockchain (
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/qrk/#!network) under 7.4, although all MN are absolutely identical (except the private key of course).
I explained this all already before in other posts. So maybe you should ask your developers what the problem is and not declare us for idiots.
I believe this is a temporary problem caused by version switching
I mentioned the need for more than 51% of the new version consensus
Before POS is produced, 7.4 will have the problem of caton
However, after POS output, 7.4 is stable, while caton's is 7.3
I don't have any problems with the catons anymore
---
And 7.4 is our target (POW/POS+MN)
Thanks for the answers.
The MN now seem to be running stable. Thanks for that!
But now unfortunately another annoyance comes, which was announced, where I already pointed out the problem and now do it again: 980 or 1000 confirmations for a transfer to the Exchanges is too long. I.e. a transfer takes 8-9 hours.
We actually wanted to set up a lot more QRK MN because we believe in the concept and history of QRK. But if we have to wait for 8-9 hours to sell the rewards , then unfortunately this is not interesting. In this time the price can change so much, or Exchanges can suspend the transfer and the trade, that this becomes more and more incalculable beside the past problems.
FreiEXchange wrote that they do this only because of the recommendation of the QRK developers. Why don't you give advice to wait 5,000 or 10,000 confirmations? That would be much safer and nobody would trade or sell QRK again.
You can't pass your problem with hackers on to the community and pass it on to stakeholders.