[edit] Nvm, ripple is shitty but I was able to use shapeshift to convert it.

How is it against Google's TOS? I'm not even using adsense lol, so I don't see the issue...

Hey I like your new tab ticker!

Since we had a similar layout and similar monitoring ideas, I reformatted my supernavi page so it doesn't look like any of yours and I started a page specifically geared towards trading where I feature your site for alternative ticker layouts. You can check it here - http://snerx.com/CryptoTrade

It's been heavily updated, you no longer need a fb account because it's not hosted on fb anymore, I'll be updating it even more with custom market analysis tools instead of just using other sites, let me know what you guys think - http://snerx.com/CryptoSuperNavi

That second torrent has the same videos as the first one linked. The first one is also the largest p2p swarm in the world right now lol - http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/10942405/09.01.2014_Celebrity_Nude_Photo_Hack_Collection_-__fappening

And for repeats because my site is actually getting traffic from this lol, you can get all the info you need to know here - http://snerx.com/trenches

wtf bitcointalk... my reply started a new topic... pls delete...

I'm hosting a super-navigator type page for resources revolving around this fuckery if anyone is interested lol - http://snerx.com/trenches

I will gladly take suggestions for things to add.

It just looked real similar to the old versions of our super navi, here's a thing I posted about the new versions recently - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=660892

So we're all in agreeance that good things could come of this lol?

Why isn't there a real bitcoin brokerage yet? Googling bitcoin brokerage gets you this website who's UI designer apparently committed suicide half way through the project.

Bitfinex or one of the higher-end exchanges could probably open a proper broker service so normal people could buy and sell cryptocurrencies without having to be verified on an exchange. Making difficulties is not how one makes popularity. Ease of use is essential for growing the crypto realm. Currently you cannot use bitcoin like cash, because you cannot get your hands on bitcoin half as easily as you can cash, or even stocks. So why isn't this being done already?

If I'm wrong and blind and just haven't seen the massive crypto brokerage, then I apologize and would like to formally apply to be a broker lol. I have verified accounts on ten major exchanges and have a very successful day-tradding career with crypto, doing mostly arbitrage trading but also investment planning for others and accurate predictions on asset prices for long term investments. If other people are interested in this, can we work together lol?

this seemed cool, does anyone have screen shots or source?

Dude you totally copied our code from our super-navigator lol... We posted these exact designs like a year ago...

With posts this salty, my name might as well be salty snax lol.

I'm only going to get more and more offensive in my replies as people become more and more offensive in their choice to not read.

Soz lol.

Thank you, Marlo Stanfield, for not taking the time to read the original post, let me paraphrase it for you because you were too inconsiderate to give me the time to read it yourself- Yes, this system allows for this. Every person does not need to participate. If they don't have sufficient knowledge to make an informed decision, they can easily delegate their vote to someone who does.


Thank you, efreeti, for not taking the time to read the original post, let me paraphrase it for you because you were too inconsiderate to give me the time to read it yourself- This is already happening, saying it will never happen is illogical in the highest form of the word. You contradict the meaning of the word "never" by saying something that is currently happening will never happen. A "normal" person is indeed very busy, which is why we have a massive and robust DELEFUCKINGATION SYSTEM that has been intricately outlined in the very first post which you decided to not read.

This is true, which is why by explicitly using what you've outlined here as a definition of science, Comparitive Politics is science. And again, I've talked to several comparativists with PhD's in the field about this system (as well as many other people). The comparativists have ALL (100%) said that pure democracy is the only way to instantiate a world government peacefully because of its passive approach to distributing power. I'd argue that it's exactly the same as what Bitcoin is currently doing- instantiating a world currency passively by simply out-competing all previous forms of currency. An online crypto government will just win-out by simply out-competing all previous forms of government.

It's a mouthful, I know. Me and a bunch of my trader friends and fb group peers have assembled this huge resource document that has all kinds of incredibly useful tools and information for the newest of crypto newbies to the most seasoned of miners, traders, and developers.

None of us from our group have seen a tool like this, which is what spawned the necessity of its existence. It's become an integral part of our day-to-day activities involving anything crypto and I hope you guys find it as useful as we have. It's just a simple html doc so you can edit it however you guys like (the raw html can be seen by viewing the page source with either chrome or firefox), but we constantly update it with new information and links we find so the most updated version will always be the site itself - http://snerx.com/CryptoSuperNavi

Any errors you find or things you think should be added will be included in newer versions of it. Leave comments below if you want to suggest things. =P

"If you don't like the proposed form of government here, you can literally go make your own entirely separate government on top of the same platform, and hey, maybe yours will be more successful. I doubt it, because I haven't seen you propose a full crowd-sourced government like I've just done, but I've been wrong before."

This is where I get to play prescient in predicting future arguments and quote my past prescient self, "Maybe you didn't hear me. I pretty specifically said the democratic gov that would nest on top of this platform is based entirely on the formal logic principles of liberty."

And another iteration of the division of processes should be noted here, "there's two parts to this system, the platform the government runs on, and the government itself. The platform would be like etherium but much more robust, where anyone can build their own form of government on it, and then there's the government system itself, the first of which I'm proposing as a pure democracy to instantiate and popularize the platform. The reason I chose a pure democracy is because (based on every comparative politicist with a PhD I've talked to, and I've talked to dozens about this over the years) it's the only form of government that can peacefully transition the world into a singular world-government."

If you don't like the proposed form of government here, you can literally go make your own entirely separate government on top of the same platform, and hey, maybe yours will be more successful. I doubt it, because I haven't seen you propose a full crowd-sourced government like I've just done, but I've been wrong before.


No, I said Americans are on the lower end of the intelligence spectrum. I appreciate that you chose to only read that once and assume your reading comprehension was strong enough to argue about it even though your arguments are about things no one here ever said lol. However, I guess I am a bit elitist about this system, because it's not mine, it's hundreds of people's system, similar to how Bitcoin is now. This has been crowd-sourced to death, it's only being presented here now to see if there's any dev teams that can handle it.

Okay fine, then people in the US will be left behind. I'm okay that the lower-end of the intelligence spectrum won't be the earliest adopters of this kind of system. If anything this is a positive. Why is a "huge" government a bad idea? This government is pretty minimal tbh, there's a lot less human infrastructure involved.


There's only been a couple governments in history that have had real democracy, and the problems they experienced were discussed in detail in the threads this idea was started in a couple years ago on scienceforums. This proposed system directly fixes all the named problems that a pure democracy has ever had, as well as a bunch of solutions for future possible problems. Your concerns with wide-spread disagreement on how things are done is fixed by the layered-law system similar to America's current system where there is district>city>county>state>federal breakdowns in laws.

In some forms of pure democracies yes, but not this one. A lot of people here seem to be very confused as to what liberty means. I'll give a much more robust outline of liberty in the updated constitution.


You're delusional, and I'll show you why...


It's not any harder to make it work on large-scale than it is on small-scale, because both scales are automated the same way. Voting can't be hacked on a distributed cryptographic network, just like you can't double-spend bitcoins. When a transaction goes through, it's gone through, everyone agrees on it, end of story. The information of that transaction can be anything, so votes can't be double spent either.


Voting on a crypto network is not a novelty, the bitcoin network can be used for voting, as can many other cryptocoin networks; voting isn't enough, your platform is not suitable for running an entire government system off of. We aren't just talking about voting, we're talking about the entire government, ran and automated on this distributed cryptographic network. Your platform would have to be many factors more robust in order for this to work.