Search content
Sort by

Showing 7 of 7 results by Snillegutt
Post
Topic
Board Electrum
Re: BTC stolen
by
Snillegutt
on 01/01/2022, 10:32:05 UTC
When I checked my Trezor wallet today, 01.01.2022, I found that 1.0 BTC, everything that was there - was gone. It was stolen 2021.12.01, exactly one month ago. Only I have access to my Trezor. How is this possible? I was told Trezor Model T is 100% safe? Can I track it somehow? Probably no chance of getting it back.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Snillegutt
on 07/02/2020, 09:50:55 UTC
Its so clear when its not MA faking somebody writing him, when there is no appraisal at all, like in "Swedens Insane hunt..."

Martin, if youre gonna be better at lying, you need to make it less obvious when its you writing to yourself and when its actually someone commenting. Either stop the absurd appraisal of your "abilities" or make sure "they all" bow down to the great Martin Armstrong:-)
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Snillegutt
on 30/01/2020, 16:09:47 UTC
"His ECM is totally open to interpretation - quite likely because it is flawed or a hoax - and for that reason, it is impossible to trade from."

Ok, I misinterpreted it, but anyway, I accept, he is a fraud.

Especially what I read about backchecking told me so.

There should be sufficient material for a fraud-case against him.

But he is just a small-time scammer, so the government dont care. They already fucked him 4015 times(11 yearsx365).

They will let him live out the rest of his fraudulent, narcissistic life writing grateful emails to himself:-)

What a pathetic fool
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Snillegutt
on 28/01/2020, 08:10:08 UTC
I can clearly see that MA is a fraud, in many different ways, but I am also a little bit impressed of the combination of 18.01 and what wee see after that.

He didnt call it on the day of the event, but if the market continues to move downwards and go far down, he had a hell of a luck calling it on the 18.01.2020.

If it stays above the lows of the last ten years or so, also this was a fraud, BUT if the market tanks below the lows of lets say the last 10 years or even including 2007-2009, its hard to argue that 18.01 was just a coincidence.

Anybody knows when he first published the ECM-date of 18.01?

I will let the next weeks and months inform me if the last piece of "confidence" I have in MA is gone forever or if there can be something worth listening to.

Of course it would be hard to find any sense among all his nonsense.

Maybe make a computer predicting MAs bullshit from his "luck"?
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Snillegutt
on 22/01/2020, 08:57:29 UTC

"Since 1988, Renaissance's signature Medallion fund has generated average annual returns of 66 percent."

"The remaining are "accredited investors", generally worth at least $1 million. Since its inception in March 1988, Simons' flagship $3.3 billion Medallion fund, has amassed annual returns of 35.6 percent, compared with 17.9 percent for the Standard & Poor's 500 index."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Technologies

Average 66 percent and average 35,6 percent is VERY far apart.

Post
Topic
Board Economics
MA 24 000% off on electric consumption
by
Snillegutt
on 21/10/2019, 14:26:35 UTC
Maybe it has been posted already, but on MAs: "Could We Ever Eliminate Fossil Fuels?" he lets some idiot post:

"and IF they all are electric ones assume consumption of 48kWh per km"

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/we-can-never-eliminate-fossil-fuels/


Electric cars spend on average 0,2kWh pr km. The idiots 48 is not 240% too much, but a FACTOR of 240 times to much.

I let MA know this, in a suggestion for his blog, that the contributor was off by x240 or 24 000%.

MA did not change the article, did not apologise, he din do nuffin.

What serious guy anywhere else in the world will let a mistake this big stand next to his name, but Martin Armstrong?


So instead of cars in MAs agenda using 17169TWh, that’s 26 times more than total production of 652, with a reasonable use, 17169:240=71,5T, they use 11% of total production. It’s a lot, but its not enough for MAs agenda.


Im CALLING YOU OUT ON FAKE NEWS, MARTIN ARMSTRONG. Its right there on your blog for everyone to see.


Anyone see 48 anywhere? He must have grabbed it from where the sun dont shine. And MA is this fools loudspeaker.

https://ev-database.org/cheatsheet/energy-consumption-electric-car
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Snillegutt
on 11/06/2019, 07:06:05 UTC
The sad thing is that MA always talks about corruption, but in the end, he himself is just as corrupt as his declared “enemies”. Any honest man will look for fails in his system, so that he can adjust those fails and make a better system.

Any honest engineer, philosopher, politician, pedagog, any honest person in any profession will always try to correct and make better. When MA does not speak openly on his blog on all the counseling from Socrates that do NOT work or explain why, or something – it is simply because he had a taste of fame and wants to keep it, even if its built on sand.

Honesty is a rare quality.