Comment Karma: 1
Segwit Bitcoin address: bc1qy4mxf5tcgl8zc6xe8hgcnhmpu0xgsqlyaghj5q

I do not think it will get to that point, there are a lot of factors to be considered here. Take these for example, economic backlash, corporate opposition, and potential Congressional pushback. these could limit the extent of his full-blown trade war. I think trump will eventually calm down on all these battles he is waging with everyone, its just a matter of time.

This talk of US and china is quite old and reoccurring too much. i really do no think china can surpass the US, i will break down my answer for you to see reasons why i say this.
first of all:

Economic Growth it is clear that China’s economy grew at an astonishing rate in the last few decades, but China is now facing slowing GDP growth due to factors like high debt levels, an aging population, and declining productivity growth. Meanwhile, the U.S. economy has shown surprising resilience despite economic challenges.

Demographic Crisis. China's working-age population is seriously declining, and the country's birth rate has fallen.  on the other hand, immigration has really benefited the United States by assisting in the maintenance of a stable labor force.

Geopolitical and Trade Challenges China's long-term growth in high-tech industries may be hampered by the U.S. and its allies' growing restrictions on China's access to vital technologies (such as semiconductors and advances in artificial intelligence).

Innovation and Global Perception: although China dominates in fields like artificial intelligence and electric vehicles (such as DeepSeek, BYD, and Huawei), U.S. companies like OpenAI, Tesla, and NVIDIA continue to dominate in core technologies. Also, a lot of countries continue to view the United States as a safer political and economic friend than China.

Now, I must admit that China is unquestionably a rising force, but it has too many internal issues to completely unseat the United States as the world's dominant nation anytime soon.  it is my own believe that we might shift toward a multipolar world with powerful regional powers like the US, China, the EU, and India each having a substantial amount of influence, as opposed to a unipolar one (headed by the US) or one that is dominated by China.

User: StanCrypt
Position to Apply: Member
Posts Start: 68
Address: bc1qy4mxf5tcgl8zc6xe8hgcnhmpu0xgsqlyaghj5q

In order to stabilize global trade and reduce the impact of geopolitical conflicts on the economy in any particular country, that country must diversify their trade partnerships and strengthen multilateral agreements. Relying on a single country or region like the U.S.A or any other would power country for essential goods can create vulnerabilities during conflicts, so expanding trade networks and reinforcing agreements can provide stability. Additionally, governments should promote resilient supply chains through nearshoring and friendshoring strategies while investing in domestic industries, particularly in critical sectors like energy, food, and technology. I strongly believe that these efforts would ensure that economies remain flexible and less susceptible to sudden disruptions.

Financial and diplomatic measures is also an aspect that plays a crucial role in maintaining global economic stability. Strengthening financial safety nets through institutions like the IMF and World Bank can help businesses and governments weather trade disruptions. Additionally, economic diplomacy should be prioritized to prevent disputes from escalating into sanctions or trade wars. Countries can use economic incentives, such as trade benefits and investment opportunities, to encourage peaceful resolutions. By fostering cooperation, governments can reduce uncertainty in global markets and maintain investor confidence.

Finally, energy independence and food security are essential in mitigating economic shocks caused by geopolitical tensions. Investing in renewable energy would really reduce reliance on unstable regions, while maintaining strategic reserves of key commodities like grain and fuel ensures supply stability. I also think that national economic policies such as tax relief and monetary adjustments can help businesses cope with market volatility. By the time these strategies are being implemented, global trade can remain stable even in times of political uncertainty and conflict.

Although your argument shows that there is a relationship between Trump's tariff policies and changes in the price of Bitcoin, I don't agree completely. I think you should first consider whether or not his policies are directly to blame for the cryptocurrency's collapse. First off, unlike traditional assets like stocks or commodities, Bitcoin is not directly correlated with trade policies, even though tariffs can affect traditional markets by raising costs for consumers and businesses. Numerous elements, such as institutional acceptance, investor mood, legislative changes, and macroeconomic conditions, affect the price of Bitcoin.

Second, Bitcoin is frequently regarded as a risk-on asset, which means that it typically rises when investors are feeling upbeat and falls when they are feeling less certain. Bitcoin may fall if investors turn to safer assets as a result of Trump's tariff measures, which might cause financial markets to become uncertain. But rather than being a direct result of tariffs, this is a reaction of the market as a whole. Lastly, supply and demand, which includes elements like the impending halving event, institutional investments, and more extensive crypto laws, greatly influence the price of Bitcoin. It ignores other potential causes for Bitcoin's movement to attribute the decline exclusively to Trump's tariff announcement.

you should also remember that market responses to political statements may not last long. Short-term uncertainty rather than a fundamental change in Bitcoin's value proposition could be the cause of its decline following Trump's tariff announcement. A long-term perspective would take into account how these policies impact regulatory clarity, mining profitability, or Bitcoin adoption.

The Impact of USAID Funding Cuts on the African Economy

For many years, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been a major force in the social and economic advancement of Africa. Many African countries have benefited greatly from USAID financing in areas such as infrastructure, healthcare, education, and agricultural innovation. The advancements made, however, are seriously threatened by recent financial cuts.

The immediate consequences of these cuts are evident in several sectors:  

1. Healthcare:- Many African countries rely on USAID support for HIV/AIDS treatment, maternal health, and disease prevention programs. Reductions in funding could mean fewer life-saving medications, disrupted vaccination programs, and declining healthcare infrastructure.  

2. Agriculture & Food Security:- USAID has been a key player in food security initiatives, providing support to small holder farmers and improving agricultural productivity. Funding cuts could increase food insecurity, making vulnerable populations even more at risk of hunger and malnutrition.  

3. Education & Workforce Development:- Many USAID programs support education, especially for girls and marginalized groups. A reduction in these programs could slow down literacy rates, limit skill development, and widen the employment gap, affecting long-term economic growth.  

4. Entrepreneurship & Private Sector Growth:- USAID has helped African businesses grow through funding, capacity building, and access to international markets. With funding cuts, many small businesses and startups may struggle to survive, slowing down job creation and economic expansion.  

5. Political Stability & Security:- Economic hardship and increased poverty due to funding cuts could fuel instability, making regions more vulnerable to conflict, extremism, and political unrest.  

Questions for Discussion:
1) How can African governments and private sector actors mitigate the impact of USAID funding cuts?  
2) What alternative sources of funding should African nations explore to sustain development efforts?  
3) In what ways can regional cooperation help reduce dependence on external aid?  
4) How might these funding cuts affect Africa’s relationship with other international donors, such as China or the European Union?  
5) What innovative strategies can African entrepreneurs and businesses adopt to remain resilient amid reduced international support?  

These are pressing issues that require strategic thinking and collaborative solutions. While USAID cuts present challenges, I believe they also provide an opportunity for African countries to rethink its development approach and strengthen self-sufficiency.  
What are your thoughts on this?

Hi, <@360853596440625164>c

 I have experience as a "operations coordinator" from Company Called Bolt".
Some of my primary duties were
- Organizing and moderating meetings with clients(telegram and Whatapp).
- Coordinating administrative work & checking activity.
-  Experience in Coordinating team's work plans.
- Etc.

With my experience I can manage any community on Discord no matter how large.

Current number of post (Including this one): 64
Rank: Member
bech32 address: bc1qr52pctemfpkyl5q3mfp7jqh3037ncf0jf6n90l

To improve my trading results  I will 
- Trade more instruments once I have tested and proven trading strategy
- Increasing position size and then add another strategy.
Because trade is all about making money and one of the most asked questions is "How can I make more money from trading " which the answer lies in improving your strategies.

On Friday, amid ongoing political unrest and new economic cautions for the UK, the pound dropped as low as $1.11 and government borrowing costs increased. Although Mr. Sunak had previously issued a warning about this before this summer's Tory leadership election.
Government borrowing prices decreased on Monday. Bonds with 30-year repayment terms now have an interest rate, or yield, of 3.8%. After the mini-budget and a following promise by Mr. Kwarteng to announce additional tax cuts, the rate had reached 5.17% on September 28.
On October 31, Mr. Hunt, who is supporting Mr. Sunak, is expected to lay out the government's economic strategy for taxes and expenditures.
The administration would have to make "decisions of eye-watering difficulty," he has warned.
Guy Hands, a banker and ardent Conservative supporter, however, claimed on Monday that the Conservative Party was unfit to govern the nation and ran the risk of having to request a bailout from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

What should we expect from the new Prime Minister? or is he likely to resign as his predessesor?

The former chancellor received support from around 200 Conservative MPs in public prior to the nomination deadline on Monday.
Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt withdrew after failing to win over enough lawmakers.

As a result, Mr. Sunak will succeed Liz Truss and become the country's youngest prime minister in more than 200 years.
Now that the outcome of the Tory leadership election has been determined, the new PM is anticipated to assume office within the next few days.

Following the announcement of the outcome by Sir Graham Brady, the head of the 1922 committee of backbench Tory MPs, at 14:00 BST on Monday, Mr. Sunak is scheduled to address the House of Representatives.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-63375281

considering the failure of Liz Truss, the former prime minister of the United Kingdom, who resigned on Thursday as a result of the disastrous tax-cutting budget that shook the financial markets and sparked a rebellion within her own Conservative Party.

Do you think a young primister would do any better considering the pressure and expectations coming from the United kingdom?

I would love to have your opinion on this.

Sadly, even if the punishment is death for you and your entire family, it won't still stop corruption. People will alway find better ways to carry out corrupt practices to avoid getting caught. its no one's fault, it's just the nature of man. Humans always find a way to break the law, some would argue that the law was made to be broken by the same one's who made it, it's just a matter of whose smart enough not to get caught.

Located in the "Steel City" of Whyalla, South Australia, there is a new crypto mining facility will use solar energy to power its operations. The 5-megawatt facility should be producing bitcoin at the Lumos Digital Mining business, a method that is frequently criticized for being energy-intensive.
The new crypto farm may be able to produce roughly 100 BTC annually, according to a representative of Lumos Digital Mining, depending on the available electricity.

https://news.bitcoin.com/solar-powered-crypto-farm-in-australia-to-prove-bitcoin-mining-can-be-green/

And yes, in an effort to make some money back, some miners sold off their racks of graphics cards at steep discounts before jumping ship. Wccftech discovered that some former miners in China and South Asia are even holding livestreamed auctions to get rid of their GPU "stock" in large quantities.
For instance, the RTX 3060 Ti, which miners in China are allegedly selling for between $250 and 350 dollars (about $250 and £350). Especially in the US, even a quick glance at eBay reveals numerous items at about comparable costs.

According to a Bloomberg story, the European Union plans to introduce an energy efficiency label for Bitcoin and other proof-of-work cryptocurrencies in an effort to reduce energy use. The draft plan, which is expected to be made public later today, urges the international political scene to exert pressure against the energy use of bitcoin miners. This action against bitcoin miners appears to be a precursor as the EU gets ready for a winter with fewer gas reserves from Russia due to the ongoing conflict.

The energy usage argument has recently made an effort to pick up pace as Greenpeace allocated a new $1 million budget to criticising Bitcoin and the White House started drafting its own laws to handle the bitcoin mining sector.

With all these in play and Bitcoin miners already scaling down production, Being in the mining business right now would really be a bad idea. This plan by the European Union is bound to negatively affect not just the bitcoin market but the entire crypto market which has largely assisted in financing the purchase of resources and the provision of financial services which had in turn greatly hastens the global economy's economic,  and social development especially in developing nations.


Anyways what do people think about this. Share your wisdom please.

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/legal/eu-takes-aim-at-bitcoin-energy-consumption-with-new-law

Since September 28, the Bank of England has made temporary and targeted purchases of long-term UK government bonds in accordance with its goal of promoting financial stability. On October 10th, the Bank raised the ceiling for its daily auctions from £5 billion to £10 billion. On October 11, index-linked government bonds were added to the temporary purchase program.

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2022/october/statement-on-end-of-gilt-market-operations

There is a Crisis Recovery Project being developed for Somalia by the WORLD BANK which seeks to improve national disaster preparedness while assisting in the restoration of infrastructure and means of subsistence in areas damaged by flooding and drought. There are five parts to the project.

Component 1: Immediate basic services and livelihood support for the nation's flood-affected states and locust-affected areas through the establishment of a cash-for-work program for vulnerable households, control of the desert locus population through ground and aerial spraying operations, restoration and protection of farmers' capacity for agricultural production, revitalization of basic health provisions, bolstering of response services, and support for household hygiene.

Component 2: Reconstruction of vital public and community infrastructure following a medium-term flood. The component will renovate bridges, small feeder roads, health facilities, and water and sewage infrastructure. Additionally, it will assist regional mitigation strategies for risk reduction, including environmental restoration and slope protection.

Component 3: Longer-term disaster risk preparedness will enhance institutional readiness of governmental ministries, agencies, and departments to respond to flood and drought-related calamities. The institutional capability of the PIU (Project Implementation Unit) and State Project Teams will be strengthened by

Component 4: Project Management for the project's implementation. A first-line finance choice for an emergency response will be provided by

Component 5: Contingency Emergency Response Component (CERC).

Also keep in mind that multinational corporations provides capital into developing nations. For instance, on the financial account of the balance of payments, the investment made to construct the plant is counted as a capital flow. This capital expenditure aids in the growth and expansion of the economy's productive capacity.

This degree of investment is really crucial for determining the rate of economic growth, according to the Harrod-Domar model of growth. Increasing the influx of foreign money is one of the best strategies to boost the rate of economic growth.

In order to keep Ukraine's military and populace connected, the richest man in the world turned on his company's satellite internet infrastructure there in February.
However, according to US media, the Tesla owner asked the Pentagon to fund the program in his place last month.
Musk tweeted on Friday that his space company, which creates the Starlink system, "is not attempting to recoup previous expenses, but also cannot fund the existing system permanently." Starlink uses a network of satellites to deliver high-speed internet. It has proven essential for the military of Ukraine as it battles to regain Ukrainian territory from Russia.

According to Mr. Musk, maintaining the program costs $20 million (£18 million) each month. Recently, he said that SpaceX has already paid $80 million to keep Ukraine online. He stated on Twitter that "in addition to terminals, we have to develop, launch, operate & replenish satellites & ground stations." We also had to protect ourselves from more difficult cyberattacks and jamming.

If Elon Musk decides he no longer want's to bear the cost of funding the Starlink system, will the pentagon step in and take over the funding or leave Ukraine to their faith?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63266142

This is the very reason the international humanitarian law to safeguard children during times of war was implemented. The protection of children who have been impacted by conflict in terms of food, clothing, medical, education, and family reunification is covered under the Geneva Conventions and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. They also aim to shield kids from being enlisted in the military and ethnic cleansing. However, these regulations are not often followed, particularly when it comes to enlisting young people in the military.