Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 22 results by StellarX88
...the miners change and my intensities dont work, odnt dont work.
xmr-stak?xmr stak
and xmr aeon stak
Why xmr-stak?!
because of its integration with the JJ's hash monitor. I never figured out the cast xmr;s UI that sets hash rate thresholds.
anyway I did use cast xmr and got similar hashrate. Not sure where the problem is. Using win 10 1709
Go back and look on the Cast thread for StellarX88's modified JJ hash monitor script. That works with Cast + JJ hash monitoring, and works very well.
JJ has released closed source precious Guardian too to work around this too. As of now I am still using the one I modified myself for both Xmr-stak & Cast-Xmr. Let me know if you need assistance to set it up on your rig.
Hi Stellax88,
I have seen your post on cast-xmr on hash monitoring. are you still using it after the monero 7 fork?
can you share your script?
Hi, sorry for late reply, didn't browse this thread for a bit. Yes, I am still running the modified JJ script monero 7 fork, even though with the new driver chances of hash drop is lower, it's still a failsafe to run it. Hit me up on Skype @ mo.jin.ee if you need direct assistance/modification with the script.
This is the version that I shared: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TnicWxpB1TtGQCe_cuXND8ha-XsgQsU1
I have a somewhat updated and modified version pre Precious Guardian that I am running now, but I don't think there's much difference there.
Thanks Stellax. have you tried SRB miner? it is giving me about 80 - 100kh/s more than cast or xmr-stak.
You are welcome. No, I haven't try SRB miner. Since I am only running one GPU, I am okay with tweaking around using Cast-XMR & XMR-Stak with the hash drop script alone. When I am into toying around with fine tweaking my GPU, I might consider modifying it accordingly with SRB Miner as well. I have already accepted the fate of Hynix memory hashing a tad lower than Samsung.
...the miners change and my intensities dont work, odnt dont work.
xmr-stak?xmr stak
and xmr aeon stak
Why xmr-stak?!
because of its integration with the JJ's hash monitor. I never figured out the cast xmr;s UI that sets hash rate thresholds.
anyway I did use cast xmr and got similar hashrate. Not sure where the problem is. Using win 10 1709
Go back and look on the Cast thread for StellarX88's modified JJ hash monitor script. That works with Cast + JJ hash monitoring, and works very well.
JJ has released closed source precious Guardian too to work around this too. As of now I am still using the one I modified myself for both Xmr-stak & Cast-Xmr. Let me know if you need assistance to set it up on your rig.
Hi Stellax88,
I have seen your post on cast-xmr on hash monitoring. are you still using it after the monero 7 fork?
can you share your script?
Hi, sorry for late reply, didn't browse this thread for a bit. Yes, I am still running the modified JJ script monero 7 fork, even though with the new driver chances of hash drop is lower, it's still a failsafe to run it. Hit me up on Skype @ mo.jin.ee if you need direct assistance/modification with the script.
This is the version that I shared: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TnicWxpB1TtGQCe_cuXND8ha-XsgQsU1
I have a somewhat updated and modified version pre Precious Guardian that I am running now, but I don't think there's much difference there.
Hi Guys,
I will buy some vega 56 or 64 on amazon,
Any tips for brands or partnumbers for increase the possibility of getting an vega with Samsung memory ?
Thanks
I will buy some vega 56 or 64 on amazon,
Any tips for brands or partnumbers for increase the possibility of getting an vega with Samsung memory ?
Thanks
The question is which card will you buy, I mean is it reference version or version form asus and sapphire, cause they are different from each other? I have vega from gigabyte but that is simple reference version build by amd.
I was lucky to have Samsung memory on that board..
Hi ivakar,
Thanks for help,
I just thinking for the reference version too, that had the turbine cooler, could it increase the possibility of have samsung memory?
Could you send the link of amazon of your card?
Thanks
All reference Vega (56/64) [Don't matter ASUS/Sapphire/XFX/Gigabyte/MSI] pretty much have Samsung memory since other PCB manucfacturer aren't even gearing up to produce Vega PCB back then; For aftermarket Vega design (Strix, Sapphire Nitro+, Red Devil, Air Boost), you are likelier to find Samsung memory on Vega 64, and Hynix memory on Vega 56.
...the miners change and my intensities dont work, odnt dont work.
xmr-stak?xmr stak
and xmr aeon stak
Why xmr-stak?!
because of its integration with the JJ's hash monitor. I never figured out the cast xmr;s UI that sets hash rate thresholds.
anyway I did use cast xmr and got similar hashrate. Not sure where the problem is. Using win 10 1709
Go back and look on the Cast thread for StellarX88's modified JJ hash monitor script. That works with Cast + JJ hash monitoring, and works very well.
JJ has released closed source precious Guardian too to work around this too. As of now I am still using the one I modified myself for both Xmr-stak & Cast-Xmr. Let me know if you need assistance to set it up on your rig.
@ All with Vega 56 with Hynix HBM2:
I read here, that the most V56 with Hynix having issues if the frequency is higher than 890Mhz.
I have one V56 Hynix running well @890/0915mV
A second V56 Hynix has issues with this settings and brings GPU errors
What voltages do you apply in Wattman/OverDriveNTool/Regmods???
Please let me know. THANKS
I read here, that the most V56 with Hynix having issues if the frequency is higher than 890Mhz.
I have one V56 Hynix running well @890/0915mV
A second V56 Hynix has issues with this settings and brings GPU errors
What voltages do you apply in Wattman/OverDriveNTool/Regmods???
Please let me know. THANKS
I am not certain if raising voltage will assist with higher core clock without throwing invalid shares, but what I did was merely reducing the mem clock until no error was thrown. If increasing voltage will allow the HBM memory to hash at expected hashrate I would have done so. But so far it doesn't seems to be the case (able to push to 930 mem clock, but no amount of voltage bump will fix the invalid calculation error).
So got a Vega 56 to play around finally.
Mining cryptonight @1926 H/s with xmr-stak at 1408 core and 925 HBM2 (900mV). Even though the overdriveNTool profile is set to run at 1408/915mV HWinfo64 says the CVDDC is at 1.25V. MVDDC changes get reflected but not the core. Any pointers?
I am already using soft pp table btw.
Core P6 is 1212, 910 mV and P7 is 1408, 915 mV
HBM2 P3 is 925, 900mV
Mining cryptonight @1926 H/s with xmr-stak at 1408 core and 925 HBM2 (900mV). Even though the overdriveNTool profile is set to run at 1408/915mV HWinfo64 says the CVDDC is at 1.25V. MVDDC changes get reflected but not the core. Any pointers?
I am already using soft pp table btw.
Core P6 is 1212, 910 mV and P7 is 1408, 915 mV
HBM2 P3 is 925, 900mV
Pretty impressive, is that a reference model with Samsung memory?
The readings on hwinfo could be flipped depending on version reading, 1.25V is actually the MVDDC, your core voltage should be sub 0.9 as for your p7 915mV.
May I know what's your xmr-stak config for this? Inn terms of intensity.
Reference with Samsung. 1932 intensity, 2 threads. I am not sure if it's flipped. Cause it reflects the changes I do in MVDDC in HWInfo.
Samsung is indeed still the king, I am more amazed with the intensity with you not flashing to 64 BIOS.
It is indeed flipped, p3 mem voltage has nothing to do with adjusting memory voltage, it's hardcoded to 1.25V in BIOS for 56, and 1.35V in BIOS for 64. The adjustment you make in p3_mem voltage is merely setting the bare floor voltage for GPU core, but p7_gpu voltage takes precedence; no voltage adjustment that you can perform in OverDriveNTool is going to impact mem voltage.
So got a Vega 56 to play around finally.
Mining cryptonight @1926 H/s with xmr-stak at 1408 core and 925 HBM2 (900mV). Even though the overdriveNTool profile is set to run at 1408/915mV HWinfo64 says the CVDDC is at 1.25V. MVDDC changes get reflected but not the core. Any pointers?
I am already using soft pp table btw.
Core P6 is 1212, 910 mV and P7 is 1408, 915 mV
HBM2 P3 is 925, 900mV
Mining cryptonight @1926 H/s with xmr-stak at 1408 core and 925 HBM2 (900mV). Even though the overdriveNTool profile is set to run at 1408/915mV HWinfo64 says the CVDDC is at 1.25V. MVDDC changes get reflected but not the core. Any pointers?
I am already using soft pp table btw.
Core P6 is 1212, 910 mV and P7 is 1408, 915 mV
HBM2 P3 is 925, 900mV
Pretty impressive, is that a reference model with Samsung memory?
The readings on hwinfo could be flipped depending on version reading, 1.25V is actually the MVDDC, your core voltage should be sub 0.9 as for your p7 915mV.
May I know what's your xmr-stak config for this? Inn terms of intensity.
does anyone have experience with this V56?
MSI Radeon RX Vega 56 Boost OC
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/Radeon-RX-Vega-56-Air-Boost-8G-OC/Overview
Hashrates and setup would be great
even if someone can tell wether the v56 regmods work or not.
THANKS
i have this 3 pics,all of cards have Hynix HBM. so,i set up memory clock 890@900mv core 1400mh stable.with ~1800H/s.MSI Radeon RX Vega 56 Boost OC
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/Radeon-RX-Vega-56-Air-Boost-8G-OC/Overview
Hashrates and setup would be great
even if someone can tell wether the v56 regmods work or not.
THANKS
powerplaymod is working fine same AIB card's.
Did you try pushing your Hynix memory to 930 or 950 mem range? Does it hash in good result? Or just throwing invalid shares all around?
Thanks.
pushing memclock to 930 is can. but show invalid shares. 940 is unstable.
Same as my case, seems to be a Hynix issue. My ASUS Strix also purely throw invalid shares at much higher OC. At 890 mem it's hashing fine at lower rate.
does anyone have experience with this V56?
MSI Radeon RX Vega 56 Boost OC
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/Radeon-RX-Vega-56-Air-Boost-8G-OC/Overview
Hashrates and setup would be great
even if someone can tell wether the v56 regmods work or not.
THANKS
i have this 3 pics,all of cards have Hynix HBM. so,i set up memory clock 890@900mv core 1400mh stable.with ~1800H/s.MSI Radeon RX Vega 56 Boost OC
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/Radeon-RX-Vega-56-Air-Boost-8G-OC/Overview
Hashrates and setup would be great
even if someone can tell wether the v56 regmods work or not.
THANKS
powerplaymod is working fine same AIB card's.
Did you try pushing your Hynix memory to 930 or 950 mem range? Does it hash in good result? Or just throwing invalid shares all around?
Thanks.
At 56 BIOS (Can't find Hynix 64 BIOS to flash on to try yet), I am able to actually run the mem overclock at 950, it actually won't crash but there is no accepted results, so I find the maximum mem overclock without throwing invalid shares at 890 Mhz.
It's taking 900 mV using overdriveNTool, on hwInfo it's drawing 0.881V just like my previous ref vega56. (Still unsure if this is the core clock power draw or mem clock power draw) This is with registry edit so the undervolt works, compared to ref vega 56, my on the wall power draw has been reduced by about 30 Watt. I imagine the power draw should be the same as ref, the difference is likely due to me running ref vega 56 at 64 BIOS (higher mem/core clock power draw @ 1.35V).
For reference,
before: r7 1700 + rx480 8gb + ref vega56 (64 BIOS) -> ~ 400W
now : r7 1700 + rx480 8gb + strix vega56 -> ~ 370W
Thanks again.It's taking 900 mV using overdriveNTool, on hwInfo it's drawing 0.881V just like my previous ref vega56. (Still unsure if this is the core clock power draw or mem clock power draw) This is with registry edit so the undervolt works, compared to ref vega 56, my on the wall power draw has been reduced by about 30 Watt. I imagine the power draw should be the same as ref, the difference is likely due to me running ref vega 56 at 64 BIOS (higher mem/core clock power draw @ 1.35V).
For reference,
before: r7 1700 + rx480 8gb + ref vega56 (64 BIOS) -> ~ 400W
now : r7 1700 + rx480 8gb + strix vega56 -> ~ 370W
So it should be safe to assume that ref and aftermarket are about the same, except for the slower memory. Did you use the same registry tools (and .reg files) that you used in the ref card (I guess they're the same)?
With only 1 card I can never be certain if the memory manufacturer is the fault for overclocking tolerance, or it might be due to how the BIOS is programmed (I really doubt that but if it can be fixed via software it will be awesome), but your assumption is more or less correct. Aftermarket is essentially changes on the heatsink + cooler design, and also possibly some BIOS tweaks from each brand themselves.
The registry file for my ASUS strix doesn't come with softPTTTable, so I merely apply the one I had for previous ref 56 onto it and it will be effective after a disable/enable or full pc reboot. I don't recall if there's any major difference between ref 56 core clock and mem clock out of the box vs Asus Strix, so the registry application is meant for undervolting and power draw reduction (adjusting core clock p2 to p5).
So, what makes of aftermarket cards are out there ?
I know of Sapphire. Others ?
Also, what memory they're using ?
I know of Sapphire. Others ?
Also, what memory they're using ?
I myself has switched from Ref 56 to ASUS Strix Vega 56. The one I had comes with Hynix memory, it could push to 950 mem clock, but it's all invalid shares from there on, so I have to downclock the memory to 890 ish, doing about 1750 to 1800 h/s at best.
What is the tension you can run the hynix memory at ? Can it hold 875 or 900mV ? What is the power needs (higher or lower than the ref) ?
At 56 BIOS (Can't find Hynix 64 BIOS to flash on to try yet), I am able to actually run the mem overclock at 950, it actually won't crash but there is no accepted results, so I find the maximum mem overclock without throwing invalid shares at 890 Mhz.
It's taking 900 mV using overdriveNTool, on hwInfo it's drawing 0.881V just like my previous ref vega56. (Still unsure if this is the core clock power draw or mem clock power draw) This is with registry edit so the undervolt works, compared to ref vega 56, my on the wall power draw has been reduced by about 30 Watt. I imagine the power draw should be the same as ref, the difference is likely due to me running ref vega 56 at 64 BIOS (higher mem/core clock power draw @ 1.35V).
For reference,
before: r7 1700 + rx480 8gb + ref vega56 (64 BIOS) -> ~ 400W
now : r7 1700 + rx480 8gb + strix vega56 -> ~ 370W
So, what makes of aftermarket cards are out there ?
I know of Sapphire. Others ?
Also, what memory they're using ?
I know of Sapphire. Others ?
Also, what memory they're using ?
I myself has switched from Ref 56 to ASUS Strix Vega 56. The one I had comes with Hynix memory, it could push to 950 mem clock, but it's all invalid shares from there on, so I have to downclock the memory to 890 ish, doing about 1750 to 1800 h/s at best.
How does the noise of the card compare to the ref card? I assume a lot less noise to maintain similar temperature?
Yes, the pros are definitely lower fan speed and noise, you can achieve similar temperature with much lower fan speed, so it's doing 2.2k - 2.5k RPM at the moment.
This is probably not relevant if you are building an open air mining rig, but for my case it's my gaming PC, so another difference is the hot air is not disposed at the rear of the card (Reference), but being pushed within the closed case environment, so you will need a few casing fan to pull the hot air out as well.
So, what makes of aftermarket cards are out there ?
I know of Sapphire. Others ?
Also, what memory they're using ?
I know of Sapphire. Others ?
Also, what memory they're using ?
I myself has switched from Ref 56 to ASUS Strix Vega 56. The one I had comes with Hynix memory, it could push to 950 mem clock, but it's all invalid shares from there on, so I have to downclock the memory to 890 ish, doing about 1750 to 1800 h/s at best.
anyone have ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA 64's and nitro plus vega 64 powerplaymod files?
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
Why would the registry files be any different than the stock blower style cooler? It's the exact same card.. It baffles me how people think changing the outside cooler turns it into a completely different card. If the core and memory are the same (from same manufacturer), the card will perform exactly the same (apart from better thermals of course)...
now testing....
Hi, do you mind sharing your ASUS Strix Vega 64 BIOS with me? Can I know if the model that you get are using Samsung/Hynix memory?
I have acquired an ASUS Strix Vega 56 recently, but with Hynix memory, and it seems that while I can push the mem clock to 950, and subsequently hashing it at about 1.8k - 1.9k, all it produces are just invalid shares on both XMR-stak & Cast-XMR. I can only somewhat reliably hashing with 900 Mhz @ 1.75 kh/s, and it still produces trickles of invalid shares. Seems like better cooling solution could potentially come with a downside of worse silicon lottery.
Thanks.
Are you sure your card has Hynix HBM2 memory or you just using old gpu-z?
http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/17/12/26/vxm.png
Asus ROG-Strix 64 stock Vbios
https://1.bitsend.jp/download/ba435b729cdb870bab06f767b9edec5b.html
also sapphire nitro plus 64 stock Vbios
https://1.bitsend.jp/download/58555c754fd2f0135681fde6ad83f186.html
by the way,i had start mining EDC last night,100000EDC also mined.
Thanks for sharing! Unfortunately I can't apply it on my 56 as subsystem ID mismatch error shows up during ATIflash, since it's Samsung vs Hynix, i imagine it's not compatible.
anyone have ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA 64's and nitro plus vega 64 powerplaymod files?
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
Why would the registry files be any different than the stock blower style cooler? It's the exact same card.. It baffles me how people think changing the outside cooler turns it into a completely different card. If the core and memory are the same (from same manufacturer), the card will perform exactly the same (apart from better thermals of course)...
now testing....
Hi, do you mind sharing your ASUS Strix Vega 64 BIOS with me? Can I know if the model that you get are using Samsung/Hynix memory?
I have acquired an ASUS Strix Vega 56 recently, but with Hynix memory, and it seems that while I can push the mem clock to 950, and subsequently hashing it at about 1.8k - 1.9k, all it produces are just invalid shares on both XMR-stak & Cast-XMR. I can only somewhat reliably hashing with 900 Mhz @ 1.75 kh/s, and it still produces trickles of invalid shares. Seems like better cooling solution could potentially come with a downside of worse silicon lottery.
Thanks.
Are you sure your card has Hynix HBM2 memory or you just using old gpu-z?
http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/17/12/26/vxm.png
anyone have ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA 64's and nitro plus vega 64 powerplaymod files?
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
Why would the registry files be any different than the stock blower style cooler? It's the exact same card.. It baffles me how people think changing the outside cooler turns it into a completely different card. If the core and memory are the same (from same manufacturer), the card will perform exactly the same (apart from better thermals of course)...
now testing....
Hi, do you mind sharing your ASUS Strix Vega 64 BIOS with me? Can I know if the model that you get are using Samsung/Hynix memory?
I have acquired an ASUS Strix Vega 56 recently, but with Hynix memory, and it seems that while I can push the mem clock to 950, and subsequently hashing it at about 1.8k - 1.9k, all it produces are just invalid shares on both XMR-stak & Cast-XMR. I can only somewhat reliably hashing with 900 Mhz @ 1.75 kh/s, and it still produces trickles of invalid shares. Seems like better cooling solution could potentially come with a downside of worse silicon lottery.
Thanks.
https://1.bitsend.jp/download/c29e6b5ed1891b939b9c99e31750b2ee.html
quick setup hit 2k+ also silent and cool than Airblow but its not worth 900USD at japan.
https://imgur.com/a/A1hGi
Hey, sorry to trouble again, it seems you provided me with the registry file rather than the BIOS. Are you able to grab a copy of the stock BIOS using atiflash? By the way, does your Strix Vega 64 comes with BIOS switch?
Thanks.
anyone have ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA 64's and nitro plus vega 64 powerplaymod files?
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
Why would the registry files be any different than the stock blower style cooler? It's the exact same card.. It baffles me how people think changing the outside cooler turns it into a completely different card. If the core and memory are the same (from same manufacturer), the card will perform exactly the same (apart from better thermals of course)...
now testing....
Hi, do you mind sharing your ASUS Strix Vega 64 BIOS with me? Can I know if the model that you get are using Samsung/Hynix memory?
I have acquired an ASUS Strix Vega 56 recently, but with Hynix memory, and it seems that while I can push the mem clock to 950, and subsequently hashing it at about 1.8k - 1.9k, all it produces are just invalid shares on both XMR-stak & Cast-XMR. I can only somewhat reliably hashing with 900 Mhz @ 1.75 kh/s, and it still produces trickles of invalid shares. Seems like better cooling solution could potentially come with a downside of worse silicon lottery.
Thanks.
https://1.bitsend.jp/download/c29e6b5ed1891b939b9c99e31750b2ee.html
quick setup hit 2k+ also silent and cool than Airblow but its not worth 900USD at japan.
https://imgur.com/a/A1hGi
Thanks alot for the BIOS. I will give it a try, even though I doubt it will fix mine since it seems to be more of a silicon lottery. Are you able to have 100% shares with the quick set up?
I paid 800USD for my 56, but if yours hash fine with much error at least it's better than mine for sure.
Cheers!
anyone have ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA 64's and nitro plus vega 64 powerplaymod files?
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
i had order that,it will come tomorrow.
Why would the registry files be any different than the stock blower style cooler? It's the exact same card.. It baffles me how people think changing the outside cooler turns it into a completely different card. If the core and memory are the same (from same manufacturer), the card will perform exactly the same (apart from better thermals of course)...
now testing....
Hi, do you mind sharing your ASUS Strix Vega 64 BIOS with me? Can I know if the model that you get are using Samsung/Hynix memory?
I have acquired an ASUS Strix Vega 56 recently, but with Hynix memory, and it seems that while I can push the mem clock to 950, and subsequently hashing it at about 1.8k - 1.9k, all it produces are just invalid shares on both XMR-stak & Cast-XMR. I can only somewhat reliably hashing with 900 Mhz @ 1.75 kh/s, and it still produces trickles of invalid shares. Seems like better cooling solution could potentially come with a downside of worse silicon lottery.
Thanks.
I've just set up my second rig with 8 vega 56's. I am using xmr-stak-amd. When I go to global wattman, my gpu frequency can only go to -4% or -8% for some. I am using the Aug 23 blockchain driver. When I open xmr-stak-amd and let it run, the hashrate stays at 0 h/s. Eventually it will show 1500 h/s for all 16 threads. I'm not sure whats going on. Any suggestion or help is appreciated!
Try to DDU and reinstall the driver from scratch. Better, avoid using Wattman to UV or OC, try to use OverdriveNTool.
Have you try to disable & enable all Vega on PC reboot everytime? It should get you to 1.5-6k hash each card with 2 threads intensity; Do remember to OC your mem clock to 900 - 950 Mhz to achieve higher hashrate (for stock 56 BIOS), or 1000 - 1100 Mhz (flashed to 64 BIOS).
I've backread a few pages but can't seem to find the lowest power consumption possible for a VEGA 64 mining monero, anyone?
I know this isn't the selling thread but by any chance anyone willing to sell me a second hand (but working well with no issues) RX VEGA 56 reference design (MSI/XFX/PowerColor/Gigabyte)? I am willing to escrow payment amounting to $750 for the card alone and extra for shipping to Asia. I just need one to complete a rig.
I know this isn't the selling thread but by any chance anyone willing to sell me a second hand (but working well with no issues) RX VEGA 56 reference design (MSI/XFX/PowerColor/Gigabyte)? I am willing to escrow payment amounting to $750 for the card alone and extra for shipping to Asia. I just need one to complete a rig.
I PM-ed you on the possibility of offering my Vega56 up for sale, but wasnt able to reply due to PM limitation. Is it possible for us to take this somewhere else like Skype?
Thanks.