Search content
Sort by

Showing 5 of 5 results by StevenBender
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Bitcanna coin : Scam alert
by
StevenBender
on 05/12/2019, 20:09:49 UTC
I have 300K coins, which are worthless. I was hoping in the success of Rebellious, but there's not much what can you do when you run out of funds. The company’s founders invested in a high-risk startup company that eventually turned out to be a costly failure.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Bitcanna coin : Scam alert
by
StevenBender
on 05/12/2019, 19:16:45 UTC
@StevenBender

No, you are wrong. Both Rebellious and BitCanna are the same registerd company, both had same team members and office space, and were working on very similar blockchain. Also scam doesn't have to be about ICO money, which wasn't the case here. Rebellious team and their telegram admins were lying and misleading community, traders and investors about developing masternodes with certain ROI and then, right after the mainnet swap they annouced spin to crypto exchange which was another empty shell. So false promises and made up plans were to lure buyers which end up with untradable coin worth nothing. Sounds like a scam to me.

This table was the main selling point for REBL tokens
https://i.imgur.com/DbzDWbi.jpg

The goal of Rebellious was to create a Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) business, that is creating customized blockchains for companies who lacked the knowledge to build their own.
In the year that followed, the company built a working MVP, which was its own Blockchain, but they were unable to sell its product in the market, mainly because the demand for the product was scarce, and implementing a new technology like blockchain technology faces high standards. Competing with industry leaders with high authority in the technology industry has proven to be too difficult.

Rebellious pivoted its strategy in the spring of 2019 in an attempt to start generating income and building towards a long-term solution, the exchange. This was unsuccessful, the company ran out of funds, and finally, Rebellious was discontinued as a company.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Bitcanna coin : Scam alert
by
StevenBender
on 05/12/2019, 14:39:55 UTC
You are wrong. BitCanna and Rebellious are two companies who shared some team members once. Rebellious was a self-funded company backed by private investors which ran out of money and had to be discontinued because no income was made. BitCanna had an ICO and it still has funds, many clients awaiting the release of the platform and all the stuff provided in their roadmap. Rebellious distributed the tokens during an airdrop, they did not take your money.
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Ban Appeal - Full Member Profile
by
StevenBender
on 25/10/2018, 20:30:30 UTC
Hi,

I am raising this ban appeal post on behalf of a friend who is a full member in Bitcointalk and been really active for a very long time period.

UserName: askmecrypto
Profile Id: 1171473
Profile URL:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1171473

His profile is captured under Modlog as Autoban.
He did research, his profile is never captured in plagiarism or any hate responds.

Please help to understand reason for the ban.

Please view the screenshot linked in the URL below for a proof of the ban.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wtVuGIom_XoKYJyhohUZcx1hScUhjLL_/view?usp=sharing

Thank you,
Steven
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: REBELLIOUS Discussion Thread
by
StevenBender
on 02/02/2018, 18:10:03 UTC
I dont trust them. We voted em for Bit-Z and they say now i can send you 700 REBL if you are lvl 3 user. This means ypu have to KYC for 700 REBL. And they dont give my 4000 REBL also. I wrote a mail and they talked too wrong. They said case closed go away. I want to my own effort. I didt 4k REBL in 30 mins maybe. Its not good i dont like them.

Our team decided to ask Bit-Z to distribute the voting bonus as they have the proof of voting but we did not expect them to restrict it to level 3 users due to the KYC and AML laws. The core team assisted people if they did not receive their tokens, and was pretty cautious about fraudulent applications. You should have used better arguments if you think they did not talk that well about your issue or point this fact out.