Search content
Sort by
Showing 14 of 14 results by TarzanSupplex
What are the default intensities for x11 on a 980 ti??
Thanks
Is it the same as lyraRev2?
Thanks
Is it the same as lyraRev2?
22 for 5.0+ cards across the board and 19.5 for older cards if I'm not mistaken:
Quote from: x11.cu
uint32_t intensity = (device_sm[device_map[thr_id]] > 500) ? 256 * 256 * 22 : 256 * 128 * 39;
It'd be nice though if ccminer would show the instensity upon launch even if the -i parameter isn't used.
Thanks for the info-
displaying the default intensity would be great
My poor superclocked 950 can barely get 5400 KH while my overclocked 750 TI can get north of 5200 KH using much less power- is there any more data I can give you to help with dialing in the 950? Intensity for both seems to top out at 20.
There is nothing wrong with your 950 or your config. All 9-series maxwell gpus are poor in lyra2v2 performance compared to 7-series maxwell hash/w wise. 950/60 really suck because of their crippled 128-bit memory lane. Better mine some other algo with them.
980 TIs arent too bad- but I get what youre saying. I think there is some room for optimization on the 950 however- Its should be able to hang and outpace the 750 TI by a wider margin-
Usually I mine Quark- but the payrate has tanked as of late...
The 750ti will go down as "The little engine that could". For what they are capable of power wise they can't be beat. If the other Maxwell cards could give the same performance (hash per wattage per price).
Fully agree- especially when you consider the price point I picked it up at-
My poor superclocked 950 can barely get 5400 KH while my overclocked 750 TI can get north of 5200 KH using much less power- is there any more data I can give you to help with dialing in the 950? Intensity for both seems to top out at 20.
There is nothing wrong with your 950 or your config. All 9-series maxwell gpus are poor in lyra2v2 performance compared to 7-series maxwell hash/w wise. 950/60 really suck because of their crippled 128-bit memory lane. Better mine some other algo with them.
980 TIs arent too bad- but I get what youre saying. I think there is some room for optimization on the 950 however- Its should be able to hang and outpace the 750 TI by a wider margin-
Usually I mine Quark- but the payrate has tanked as of late...
what is the default intensity for Lyra2rev2 on a 980 ti??
The default intensity is -X 18. You can test with -X 30. Might be faster?
Thanks-
I have been setting intensity by device since I have a 950 in the mix. 20 seems to work well with the non-monitor 980 ti-
My poor superclocked 950 can barely get 5400 KH while my overclocked 750 TI can get north of 5200 KH using much less power- is there any more data I can give you to help with dialing in the 950? Intensity for both seems to top out at 20.
what is the default intensity for Lyra2rev2 on a 980 ti??
The default intensity is -X 18. You can test with -X 30. Might be faster?
Thanks-
I have been setting intensity by device since I have a 950 in the mix. 20 seems to work well with the non-monitor 980 ti-
Intensity of 20 works and 21 crashes. I am a bit of a noob- I am guessing I dont want to limit my 980 TIs- do I need to just set the intensity for the 950? I am not sure how to just set it on one gpu. Can I get some help with that? Appreciated-
Latest version works well on my 750 TIs and 980 TIs, but crashes instantly on my 950 with an out of memory at line 141 error (for lyra2rev2)- anyone know a fix? Much appreciated-
HI-
I have some lyraRev2 questions, I know the answers for some of this have been discussed but I am having trouble seeing everything I need. I have 2 980 TIs and 1 950. First, what settings do I need for the 950- it keeps crashing on me? Second, do I want to run more than 1 instance of ccminer in order to get the most out of the cards? Would I mainly need to vary intensity or what? Thanks for you time and help-
I have some lyraRev2 questions, I know the answers for some of this have been discussed but I am having trouble seeing everything I need. I have 2 980 TIs and 1 950. First, what settings do I need for the 950- it keeps crashing on me? Second, do I want to run more than 1 instance of ccminer in order to get the most out of the cards? Would I mainly need to vary intensity or what? Thanks for you time and help-
Re: [POOL] YAAMP.COM multipool multialgo profit switch with exchange
Was mining quark to here:
1B6WWKxcY4mTPGyRsGYQwqjLkSvH9EjYVt
Should have earned a few fractions as I have 2 980 tis plus a 750 working
1B6WWKxcY4mTPGyRsGYQwqjLkSvH9EjYVt
Should have earned a few fractions as I have 2 980 tis plus a 750 working
Last block found was 20 hours ago. If you started mining after that, you earned nothing.
This will normalize once the pool has more hashrate, but right now, it's almost like solo-mining.
That makes sense- thanks, I will jump back in soon.
Re: [POOL] YAAMP.COM multipool multialgo profit switch with exchange
Open for public Beta Test:
http://ffpool.net
Report any problems you got either via PM or via Mail to admin at ffpool.net
http://ffpool.net
Report any problems you got either via PM or via Mail to admin at ffpool.net
Mining SAK? That's brave :-) Pointing a miner your way, we'll see how it goes...
Maybe YAAMP clones should create their own threads for feedback?
SAK is very profitable ,thats why we're mining it
I'll open a fresh thread for the pool soon, just testing out a few final things and then we'll have an own thread.