Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 50 results by TetraHect0rCannabinol
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Case and investigation issued against Adam Guerbuez
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 20/05/2017, 23:19:46 UTC
Ok, I am very interested in this, im not going to offer you money as that would be a catch 22 however I will plead with you on this to just release it, otherwise you're full of shit, either which way adam has done enough to shoot him self in the foot, the public knows this, but still if you have information which could prove he is doing as we say or more then just release it like everyone else has.
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Pickaxe Power - Bitcoin and Altcoin Address Generator (Split Key)
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 26/02/2017, 03:14:49 UTC
Closed Thread

Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: [Bounty - Claimed] Vanity address split-key generator software
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 08/01/2017, 16:35:50 UTC
I do plan at some point to use the arm controller / gpu also on some boards but im currently trying to write a miner for Parallella microserver, it uses c as its main libary for threading onto the Epiphany controller.

I picked that board because its new and has 18 cores to play with, im just stuck getting the right code to mine with thats all Sad
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Trying to create a FPGA miner with vanity address split-key generator
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 05/12/2016, 05:47:04 UTC
Hi sorry to bring up a old thread, but I am trying to create a fpga miner this is the part of the code im stuck with :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1704597

if someone wants to help that be great, @ThePicachu any guidance ?
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
C - Generate Public key of (public key hex + private key hex) - any help ?
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 05/12/2016, 03:41:38 UTC
Following this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=90587.20

Can anyone help me, I am try to take a public key and private key, and create a split address public key, here is my code :

The out put is a char ptr which I convert to const after.
Code:

char* convert_public_key_and_private_wif_to_pubkey(const char* pub_key, const char* priv_key) {
    EC_GROUP* ecgrp;
    EC_KEY* miner_key;
    EC_POINT* tmpg;
    EC_POINT* ppnt;
    BIGNUM order;
    BIGNUM cofactor;
    BIGNUM bnbase;
    BIGNUM bnpriv;
   
   
    unsigned char eckey_buf[128], *pend;
   
    // Init BiGNUMs
    BN_init(&bnbase);
    BN_init(&order);
    BN_init(&cofactor);
    BN_init(&bnpriv);
   
    // Set Bignum Base.
    BN_set_word(&bnbase, 58);
   
    // Init Context.
    BN_CTX bnctx = BN_CTX_new();
   
    // Init Curve.
    ecgrp = EC_GROUP_new_by_curve_name(NID_secp256k1);
    miner_key = EC_KEY_new_by_curve_name(NID_secp256k1);
   
    // Init Group from Public Key.
    tmpg = EC_POINT_hex2point(ecgrp, pub_key, NULL, NULL);
   
    // Get group order.
    EC_GROUP_get_order(ecgrp, &order, NULL);
   
    // Get Cofactor.
    EC_GROUP_get_cofactor(ecgrp, &cofactor, NULL);
   
    // Set Generator.
    EC_GROUP_set_generator(ecgrp, tmpg, &order, &cofactor);
   
    // Init Key.
    EC_KEY bnkey = EC_KEY_new();
   
    // Set key group.
    EC_KEY_set_group(bnkey, ecgrp);
    EC_GROUP pgroup = EC_KEY_get0_group(miner_key);
    ppnt = EC_POINT_new(pgroup);
   
    // Precompute.
    EC_KEY_precompute_mult(bnkey, bnctx);
   
    // Set private key.
    BN_init(&bnpriv);
    BN_bin2bn(priv_key, 64, &bnpriv);
    EC_KEY_set_private_key(miner_key, bnpriv);
    EC_POINT_mul(pgroup, ppnt, miner_key, NULL, NULL, NULL);
    EC_KEY_set_public_key(miner_key, ppnt);
   
    // Add keys together.
    BN_mod_add(&order,
               EC_KEY_get0_private_key(bnkey),
       EC_KEY_get0_private_key(miner_key),
               &cofactor,
               bnctx);

    // Get and return public key.
    pend = eckey_buf;
    i2o_ECPublicKey(bnkey, &pend);
    return pend;
}


I get the following errors :
Code:
util.c: In function 'convert_public_key_and_private_wif_to_pubkey':
util.c:48:5: error: variable 'bnctx' has initializer but incomplete type
     BN_CTX bnctx = BN_CTX_new();
     ^
util.c:48:12: error: storage size of 'bnctx' isn't known
     BN_CTX bnctx = BN_CTX_new();
            ^
util.c:67:5: error: variable 'bnkey' has initializer but incomplete type
     EC_KEY bnkey = EC_KEY_new();
     ^
util.c:67:12: error: storage size of 'bnkey' isn't known
     EC_KEY bnkey = EC_KEY_new();
            ^
util.c:71:5: error: variable 'pgroup' has initializer but incomplete type
     EC_GROUP pgroup = EC_KEY_get0_group(miner_key);
     ^
util.c:71:14: error: storage size of 'pgroup' isn't known
     EC_GROUP pgroup = EC_KEY_get0_group(miner_key);
              ^
util.c:79:15: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'BN_bin2bn' differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
     BN_bin2bn(priv_key, 64, &bnpriv);
               ^
In file included from util.c:5:0:
/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:442:9: note: expected 'const unsigned char *' but argument is of type 'const char *'
 BIGNUM *BN_bin2bn(const unsigned char *s, int len, BIGNUM *ret);
         ^
util.c:80:39: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'EC_KEY_set_private_key'
     EC_KEY_set_private_key(miner_key, bnpriv);
                                       ^
In file included from util.c:6:0:
/usr/include/openssl/ec.h:819:5: note: expected 'const BIGNUM * {aka const struct bignum_st *}' but argument is of type 'BIGNUM {aka struct bignum_st}'
 int EC_KEY_set_private_key(EC_KEY *key, const BIGNUM *prv);
     ^
util.c:81:32: warning: passing argument 3 of 'EC_POINT_mul' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
     EC_POINT_mul(pgroup, ppnt, miner_key, NULL, NULL, NULL);
                                ^
In file included from util.c:6:0:
/usr/include/openssl/ec.h:685:5: note: expected 'const BIGNUM * {aka const struct bignum_st *}' but argument is of type 'EC_KEY * {aka struct ec_key_st *}'
 int EC_POINT_mul(const EC_GROUP *group, EC_POINT *r, const BIGNUM *n,
     ^
util.c:94:12: warning: pointer targets in return differ in signedness [-Wpointer-sign]
     return pend;
            ^
util.c:71:14: warning: unused variable 'pgroup' [-Wunused-variable]
     EC_GROUP pgroup = EC_KEY_get0_group(miner_key);
              ^
util.c:67:12: warning: unused variable 'bnkey' [-Wunused-variable]
     EC_KEY bnkey = EC_KEY_new();
            ^
util.c:48:12: warning: unused variable 'bnctx' [-Wunused-variable]
     BN_CTX bnctx = BN_CTX_new();
            ^
make: *** [: util.o] Error 1

BUILD FAILED (exit value 2, total time: 8s)

I took code from the first page and parts from vanitygen, I cannot find the vanityminer code correctly so anyhelp would be appreciated !
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: $XAI Sapience AIFX - Decentralized AI | 11% PoS | PlumeDB,IBTP on Testnet
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 27/07/2016, 01:37:02 UTC
Just looked over the code, Nothing suggests other than a database and lua and the IBTP that this contains Anything that can be used to build a initial AI base is just a fake shell, fuck you dev I got all excited about developing stuff for this and you ruin it by pumping and dumping it.

# Update
Confirmed, this creates the parameters of a neural network but does not run, checkout https://github.com/CedricProfit/Sapience/blob/master/src/plume/rpcplume.cpp

Line 436 has the following : Value aitrainnn(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
Line 452 has the following : Value airunnn(const Array& params, bool fHelp)

These both are where the rpc / ai is started in plume, they do nothing but return a empty object.
There is nothing in here that can be used as a ai base, if your holding this I suggest you accept its gone, its a coin using blake... thats it.

If you look at Joes Linkedin it lists his "blog" which turns out to be a it tech company, (http://turnberrysolutions.com/about-turnberry-solutions/) he doesent appear anywhere on this site, his Saas Book is fake too,
Joe your a fat pos, I hope you choke on a god damn mars bar, if you dont then I hope you fall over and brake your kneck, this could have been a awesome project.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [1800 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS]
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 16/06/2015, 13:11:25 UTC
https://blockchain.info/pools      37% unknown. More big farms. BTCS mining.

Blockchain is pretty unreliable for pool detection.

Most reliable is organofcorti:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=77000.msg11501075#msg11501075

Also try blocktrail.com

Agreed blockchain is a bit unreliable in identifying the block finder summary, blocktrail.com is glorious Smiley

Also Kano love the pool, really impressed with the pool and proxy you and con have developed, its a honor to mine at your pool. Ill be grabbing some more rigs soon, hopefully bitmain will reduce the s5's they have to around 1/1.2btc and ill grab a couple, hopefully, I mean if this BTCGuild and all the pools shutting down I can grab a few preowned unit so win win.

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Blockchain sent to wrong address?
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 05/03/2015, 01:23:54 UTC
I recently got a new computer and therefore instead of resyncing i just imported my priv keys into blockchain. I just went to send my first payment and something screwed up. Any help is appreciated. I don't know where the .07 was sent as I didn't specify that address?


I am guessing when you entered your private key into that blockchain wallet, you sweeped it and did not import it directly. And if this is correct the funds should in your blockchain wallet in one of the addresses.

nope i directly imported, I 100% know I did

curious, have you tryed contacting blockchain.info for help ? plus I havent checked but is it the same over multiple sources of the blockchain ? it might just have been a fuck up on blockchain's system, if you have lost it then luckily it was only around $15/£11 lol, imagine if it had been 0.7 btc >.<
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: BurtW arrested
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 05/03/2015, 01:19:40 UTC
WOW. No wonder he was absent from here for months. It must have been a sting operation.

And he was raving about how safe it was dealing with face to face cash transactions, and how he does it all the time :/

It is easy, cant say ive had police try to nab me but ive picked up some large amounts of btc from people in person, sad times and very much respect for BurtW Sad
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Bitcoin bank?
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 20/02/2015, 14:01:40 UTC
tbh im surprised bitcoin doesent already have some sort of wonga like businesses already.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTER.com hacked - 7170 BTC stolen [DON'T KEEP YOUR MONEY ON AN EXCHANGE]
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 19/02/2015, 05:40:47 UTC
this sucks, I really liked bter aswell, hopefully they release a report so we can lookout for their fuck up in the future Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Computer hardware
Topic OP
[SOLD] 1 x Sapphire (2GB) 6950 & 1 x Gigabyte (1GB) 6950 - [BTC][ESCROW][UK]
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 20/08/2014, 14:42:41 UTC
Im selling my last 2 GPU's, not much mining has been done on these two, I only mined talkcoin (nist5) on them so not much abuse rofl.

I will only ship these in the uk, I will accept btc only and it will be over escrow (I have messaged gweedo, will update when he responds), I will require the shipping to be finalized early as I have to pay for the shipping,
However you will get a tracking number and a place to check up on its progress to your desired shipping address, I will also send the tracking number along with said link and the shipping address (along with pictures of the gpus packed up to prove they will be well packaged) to the escrow'er so they can validate I have shipped it out and it was delivered to the provided address. once it has been delivered to the address I require the funds to be finalized and sent over, I will pay the escrow fee, on behalf of the buyer.

Any questions please inquire, if both are snapped up by the same buyer then the shipping will be only £15 as the shipping price reflects the weight and insurance.

1 x Gigabyte Raedon HD (1GB) 6950 (GV-R6950C-1GD) - No Alternative bios switch.

Comes with GPU, Original Box + All manuals & Driver Disc
I have cleaned the gpu with cleaning alcohol and reapplyed heat sync paste.

Pictures :
http://i60.tinypic.com/hx2gzo.jpg
http://i58.tinypic.com/2wmni9f.jpg
http://i57.tinypic.com/2r5cjz8.jpg
http://i62.tinypic.com/xfovok.jpg

Price : £65
Shipping : UK Only Tracked Shipping (1/2 days)  - Cost : £10

1 x Sapphire Raedon HD (2GB) 6950 (6970 Unlocked) - Alternative bios switch.

Comes with GPU, 2x 6pin to 4pin molex only, I dont have the original box and manual's, however it will be packaged well and in a msi box with foam.

I have cleaned the gpu with cleaning alcohol and reapplyed heat sync paste.

http://i60.tinypic.com/1o9.jpg
http://i58.tinypic.com/xkrk21.jpg
http://i59.tinypic.com/2rh9ru8.jpg
http://i60.tinypic.com/ot3eah.jpg

Price : £65
Shipping : UK Only Tracked Shipping (1/2 days)  - Cost : £10


GPU's Have been sold externally, topic is now locked, Ciao Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VOOT] X11 VootCoin-Nitesend | Tor | Multi-Pool | New PR Rep | Anon Ex Soon
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 12/08/2014, 12:35:40 UTC
Anyone sending money to this exchange is asked to get his money stolen.

Everything about Voot people this far has been sloppy and shady to say the least.

Nobody knows exactly who is running Btc-e either but still it is one of the most trustworthy exchanges.

As if Voot Foundation or devs have done anything to gain trust from anybody. With all the twitter saga a lot of people lost a ton of $

The twitter problems didn't cost people money.  People selling cost themselves money.  Any investor knows you don't actually take a loss until you sell.  Anyone who makes their investment decisions based on two line twitter posts should be doing something else.  Anyone who invests in alts should also know that every word you see in this forum, Reddit or Twitter is deliberately put there by someone with the goal to either raise or lower the price.  Every information input other than those from the devs (in most cases maybe) is a purely manipulative ploy designed to cause the reader to take action in support of the writer's goals.  I think you for instance want the price to go down to buy more.  In my case I am as exposed as I want to be re Voot and want the price to go up so I can sell and buy a few toys!

I agree it had nothing to do with the devs or the twitter, people where just gullible and panicked a little, not every comment is manipulative, some are people need to remember that, some are the truth and what people see, dont just play the deniable card as nothing is set in stone, a coin a day keeps the doctor in business ehh Wink

On a second note, I understand people are getting death threats, big woop, I get death threats and idiots trying to stab me up when I pick up certain illicit shit from the wrong area, I just man up and fight back, MsCollec should stop being a pussy and tell these people who are sending them to do it, as I can say this with certainty... they are bluffs and fiction, no one is going to hunt you down just because they lost a few satoshis, they move on and grab the next pump and dumper and regain a little profit.

A good point actually, if you think Mark from MtGox, he has recieved alot of death threats yet he is still here... your dealing with alot of emotional rage from the youngins who think its clever and do not know any better.

Someone send me a death threat please, please please please do Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VOOT] X11 VootCoin-Nitesend | Tor | Multi-Pool | New PR Rep | Anon Ex Soon
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 12/08/2014, 00:09:01 UTC
I just thought I would mention I was given the task of reforming into a community-run development team. Also there will be an announcement from SMOKE soon. You can follow me on Twitter @CryptoAx for the latest news.

count me in good sir Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VOOT] X11 VootCoin-Nitesend | Tor | Multi-Pool | New PR Rep | Anon Ex Soon
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 12/08/2014, 00:08:10 UTC
What do you guys think will happen when they finally deliver the anon exchange ? From what I here were a still very far from a decentralized one. Do you guys expect people to send BTCs to Mscollec and co after everything VOOT has pulled this far ?

wake up people.

I agree, I think we need to build a sort of foundation of "us", so even if mscollec jumps on we still outweight his decisions, as a foundation, we could multisig the exchanges wallets, thus on the foundation have certain people picked at random to spend 1 hour watching over the exchange, but it still does not allow decentralized control Sad  
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][VOOT] X11 VootCoin-Nitesend | Tor | Multi-Pool | New PR Rep | Anon Ex Soon
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 11/08/2014, 18:55:16 UTC
PM from MsCollec

Quote
Hi:
I can't keep up with the server cost for the exchange. I want it off my server.

wow, why are you posting this now  Huh

You wan't me to remove it? I guess you PM'ed me to help with finding new server? If it was not the reason, I can delete it.

ok delete.
I was right about voot then when you took it over, you simply wanted to pump and dump it.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [PRE-ANN] SignatureCoin (SIGN) - ANON WALLET | Free | X11 PoW/PoS | SuperBlocks
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 27/07/2014, 02:55:32 UTC
im kinda interested, probably mine next week

Thank you. Those who question if we have anon or not see this!



So have you got a white paper to explain your method of anonymous coinjoin that is implemented in sign ?

As I must say, im impressed with that checkbox, makes all the difference...
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [PRE-ANN] SignatureCoin (SIGN) - ANON WALLET | Free | X11 PoW/PoS | SuperBlocks
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 26/07/2014, 17:56:40 UTC
We will not disappoint you again. You are following one of greatest coin event. If we wanted to be perfect this should be understandable.



that is all well and good, but do excuse us for being blunt as your profile is and has Newbie status, if I where to release a coin, or moderate, or take over a coin I would do it from this profile, you can check my post history if you wish, I leave it there so people can judge my profile on the worthyness of said previous statements.

So that means when I do get involved in a project people know who and what they are getting into, you however just randomly create a account and claim to have a this "anonymous" coin, so who coded this ?
as I see you can create a quick and dirty html psd, but that shows me you are not a coder, you're not able to produce something from just pure code like a old hat, which means to me personally that you do not have a understanding of the idea you're creating, the original post also tells me that with the lack of specifications, documentation and broken english.

Just my 2 cents, again I could be wrong and are being a idiot here, but that is what i see.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [PRE-ANN] SignatureCoin (SIGN) - ANON WALLET | Free | X11 PoW/PoS | SuperBlocks
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 26/07/2014, 17:42:14 UTC
I am sorry that we found some issues in the last minute, in our registration system. We would like to postpone the launch to next Firday so we can make a better registration experiences for you.

Please announce it in the first post ..

we tried until this moment to fix it but could not.

and OP updated as follow

I am sorry Sad that we found some issues in the last minute, in our registration system. We would like to postpone the launch to next Friday so we can make a better registration experiences for you.


You have probably just killed your coin there, you have a lack of any documention explaining the features of the coin other than the OP and how you intend to distribute the pow stage, then suddenly you find a error with your "registration system", to me, not to be so blunt, sounds like a quick pump and dump scheme that you are bailing on as you tryed to hide a premine of some sort, but I could be wrong.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [PRE-ANN] SignatureCoin (SIGN) - ANON WALLET | Free | X11 PoW/PoS | SuperBlocks
by
TetraHect0rCannabinol
on 26/07/2014, 17:18:46 UTC