Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 466 results by Texacha
What are some main risks of Ethereum 2.0?
A main risk of Ethereum 2.0 is that Proof of Stake (PoS) does not work as hoped.
I think this is obv.A main risk of Ethereum 2.0 is that Proof of Stake (PoS) does not work as hoped.
Re: [ANN] Firo (FIRO) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup
Yes and I wish the dev would have left the name as Zcoin... but that's history now. 
+1Big mistake. Biggest.
I don't know what will happen in the future. I'm just giving my opinion why everyone uses ETH instead of ETC now.
When ETH goes POS, there are several possible scenarios and several POW coins where hashpower might go (ETC, RVN, ERGO, ...)
When ETH goes POS, there are several possible scenarios and several POW coins where hashpower might go (ETC, RVN, ERGO, ...)
ETC total network hashrate is 22T and ETH 1.06P , so ETH is much more secure. That could be one of reasons.
ETC was attacked with 51% more than once. It is like bank with low security vs bank with highest possible security.
ETC was attacked with 51% more than once. It is like bank with low security vs bank with highest possible security.
ETC becoming POW choice #1 (after BTC, of course)
KAAAAW 
⭐ Merited by reb0rn21 (50)
There's project supported by Bittrex, called Veriblock. They are doing on fully decentralized protection against 51% attacks on small chains, using Bitcoin hashrate.
This is still a great investment because it still has yet to hit the $10,000 barrier which it inevitably will do....
Definitely will do, but when? Next year or year after or maybe 5-6 years from now? Re: [ANN]DEFT First crypto utilizing the balloon hash, new memory hard algo
⭐ Merited by cryptomaxsun (1)
It was 2-3 years ago if I remember. Crex24 was flooded with coins and price dumped like 99%
Some people bought coins at that low prices (all down to 2 sats). Later, developer offered everyone to sell again that bought coins at current price in order to burn them, but most of people didn't want to sell their coins, so coin simply died. This told you how "serious" project was. BTW, I liked coin. It had small supply, which I considered to be good.
Some people bought coins at that low prices (all down to 2 sats). Later, developer offered everyone to sell again that bought coins at current price in order to burn them, but most of people didn't want to sell their coins, so coin simply died. This told you how "serious" project was. BTW, I liked coin. It had small supply, which I considered to be good.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
The only scammer here is you. Stop trying to blame others for your own inability to secure your devices.
Re: [ANN] Grin | PoW Mining | Electronic transactions for all. Community driven.
True, but again, where did DOGE pump come from? Good fundamentals and decentralization? Nope. It was again one man show, in this case by Elon Musk. In other cases it could be CZ or back in 2017 John McAfee. When something depends oo one man (not even one company or board of directors, but one man), it can't be more centralized.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Anyway, he can open RavenCoin block explorer https://ravencoin.network/ , enter his address and see who stole his coins (if someone did).
Re: [ANN][Main] Bitcore- BTX - Datacarriersize up to 220 bytes
Thats what matters, imho and how Bitcoin did in the biginning too.
Oh, it's new Bitcoin! It is Bitcoin 2.0 probably.We never heard this before!
