I've said it before and I'll say it again: the reputation.

I'm almost certain El Salvador does not use Bitcoin. Rofl.

Shouldn't this be in um...projects and development? Not that I care to the point that I'd report this to get sent there. I'm just really new and don't know the rules very well.

To be honest, we should stop trying to sell BTC. We should just start using it as an actual currency.

Yeah but that's only for a limited time when halving begins.

Nobody would actually lose their money. It'd be more openly stored with fiat.

Not exactly. The only time any chaos is to come around was if there was no fiat. Bitcoin needs Fiat, whether people want to believe this or not.

I love how people are REALLY trying to figure out when it'll fail. You know what they say:

First they make fun. Then they deny your success. Then, they copy you.

Lol yeah my worst mistake was when I held onto them for much too long. I lost a bundle of money.

At this moment in time, I don't really think anyone would openly leave Bitcoin at this moment. There's no reason to do so. Bitcoin has actually just become more stable I think. I was wrong to ever think otherwise.

I think you're cutting out the actual point. Literally. You just cut off the rest of my commentary. As long as Bitcoin is working for you in the way that works for you personally, that's all that matters. Not every way of living is right for every single person. You need to understand that. We can't all live the same way, which would explain people performing different jobs. Not everyone can be a doctor, and not everyone can be a construction worker. Not everyone can be a business owner. The point I'm trying to make is that everyone can live a certain way that they seem fit for them and for society as well if they feel fit.

It's the way OP is saying his opinion that isn't really making it seem valid. Everyone interprets things in their own unique way and Bitcoin would actually be no exception.


If the way you're using BTC is working for you, kudos.

It doesn't matter to me. The information left is still around and not exclusive from the public. With that being said, it's still possible to be slandered even by somebody with no default trust badge.

I'm sure they have multiple accounts they can use to still give negative ratings or positive ones.

Mhm...about that...


That trust rank system can easily be occupied to ultimately do some abusive and unjustified marks for the simple fact that you dislike someone personally. I may or may not have seen it, but I definitely know what I'm discussing in this specific position here. I can already Invision it as an abuse of power, and everyone giving negative ratings or positive ratings to people inside or out of a clique.

Yeah. Seriously. It's a complete epidemic of issues where you don't know who to trust! No wonder Bitcoin is still a lousy $400 after almost a decade of being available to the public.

I try not to, but a lot of other people go around glorifying these same exact schemes trying to make me think they're promising. Then again, they didn't try. They full blown succeeded.

honest it was so long ago, instantaneous and just all around irrelevant to me that I don't even remember. I really was close to forgetting about it, but this thread made it just come back to life.

My worst mistake was giving my money to some scheme that I hadn't even heard of.

It's pretty simplistic to me, and I'm pretty average if I do say so myself.