Do you have any evidence of this?

To name a few:
- To begin with there was/is a very substantial discrepancy between what was conveyed very clearly prior to the ico and what was/is the real state of things de facto. Dev state lagged and lags behind greatly and release of the project suffered great delays despite clear indications to the contrary before they collected funds (yes, they knew their status beforehand and could have given correct honest estimations regarding their state of progress and readiness).
- Despite having more time than described as needed when they raised funds, they still released a completely broken product in which all the promised features are either missing still or just do not work. It is important to mention that even this late release was forced on them, otherwise they would probably be delaying this for an undefined period time.
- Despite delays and ambiguity which cause some unrest and doubt with investors, the heat team did not keep good communication with their investors and community and even kept a condescending righteous attitude. They chose to avoid answering questions they did not like regardless of their significance to their investors.
- This is supposed to be a decentralized project yet it is currently very much centralized.
- Commitments that are of fundamental and critical importance to investors where compromised or intended to be compromised from the side of the heat team. You can see several occasions for this (trying to avoid distributing coins that are due to investors who paid for them is a prominent example for such breech of agreement).

This is just a partial description of a very faulty negligent and suspicious behavior from the part of this project. I can honestly tell you that if this was known beforehand I would never have invested in this (as I am sure would be the case for many of the other investors).
Every person who sent funds to the project gave them his trust (along with his money). So far they have proven to be unworthy of such trust. They seem to lack the fundamental respect and humility when dealing with their investors, their funds, and the community involved.
I can assure you that the feelings I convey are not exclusive only to me, but are felt by many of the others who invested.

on a final note: It is true that StewieG behaves in a trollish manor on occasions , that probably helps to ignore him or dismiss what he says, but you should know to see the important details despite the circus he created. He did raise some valid questions and points along the way (some of which where also raised by me and where mostly unaddressed).

I understand why there is only 0.9 btc willing to be traded into heat. What I don't understand is why no-one is trying to undersell though... At least I got liquidity when I got out. Good luck, holders

EDIT: OOh, I see now, there is no way to trade your coins safely... experimental huh... And still no exchanges able to really withdraw and deposit...
And no longer does it seem likely that many exchanges will be doing that.

Advanced users can download the server files here: https://github.com/Heat-Ledger-Ltd/heatledger/releases
No need to use the central server, API commands work fine. For documentation see: https://heatwallet.com/api
Advice: ignore the trolls!

In preparation for closing this thread, my previous post was provocative in purpose to demonstrate how feeding the the operators of chaos reveals the agenda therewith, disclosing the swift unsophisticated retaliation that in long term hinders the business objectives of Heat Ledger Ltd.

Good bye Stewieb and all the inspiring sockpuppets! We have about 24 hours to roam about over here.  

I really need to know.  Were there a privileged few who got early access to forge alone on the main chain for several hours?  Not cool if true.