Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 4,306 results by TheNewAnon135246
Maybe it's not a big issue but i think dt members should be always active as their feedbacks is publicy shown and may need updates.
DT members aren't obliged to 'be always active' in any form or way. Most feedback is left with a valid reason and shouldn't need to be revised that often either.
It seems to me that questions around DT member activity revolve around what theymos said in this below-attached post regarding his tweaking of the DT1 list criteria on about a monthly basis, which seems to have some activity criteria.. sure it is not "always" active, but requires being on line and posting as I bolded those two lines, below:
............
#3
I will periodically (maybe every month) be reconstructing the default trust list to include everyone who matches these criteria:
- If rank was determined solely using earned merit, then you must be of at least Member rank.
- You must have been online sometime within the last 3 days.
- Your trust list must include at least 10 users, not including ~distrust entries.
- You must not be banned or manually blacklisted from selection.
- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
- You must have at least 10 people directly trusting you each with an earned merit of at least 10, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
- You must have at least 2 people directly trusting you with an earned merit of at least 250, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
..........
#3
I will periodically (maybe every month) be reconstructing the default trust list to include everyone who matches these criteria:
- If rank was determined solely using earned merit, then you must be of at least Member rank.
- You must have been online sometime within the last 3 days.
- Your trust list must include at least 10 users, not including ~distrust entries.
- You must not be banned or manually blacklisted from selection.
- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
- You must have at least 10 people directly trusting you each with an earned merit of at least 10, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
- You must have at least 2 people directly trusting you with an earned merit of at least 250, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
..........
That's not what I meant. I agree with Theymos' rules, inactive members should be removed from DT1. I meant that DT members are not obliged to stay active, just because they have left negative feedback.
Your opinion is extreme. Feedback with a valid reason can also be revised and changed and even removed.
I didn't say feedback shouldn't be revised. I said it shouldn't be revised that often, which is a big difference.
Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper
I don t see you trolling over there so
That's because I don't own altcoins
.Good morning,
I understand your reactions because I also know it's a bit of a strange question.
Anyway, I certainly have no wrong intentions, but should someone be able to help me, i still like to hear that via PM.
Thank you in advance.
[/quote
Let me guess, tax fraud?
I understand your reactions because I also know it's a bit of a strange question.
Anyway, I certainly have no wrong intentions, but should someone be able to help me, i still like to hear that via PM.
Thank you in advance.
[/quote
Let me guess, tax fraud?
Re: [POLL] Should I donate the Known Alts Donation funds to Bruno's plea?
I wouldn't donate it unless there is a way to confirm that any of his relatives have access to the funds. It would be a waste if you donate it while knowing that the funds will be lost.
Maybe it's not a big issue but i think dt members should be always active as their feedbacks is publicy shown and may need updates.
DT members aren't obliged to 'be always active' in any form or way. Most feedback is left with a valid reason and shouldn't need to be revised that often either.
Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper
hm, dropping words into the legacy internet is ... cheap.
On twetch you must pay some sats, different
think of some sats more and there will be quality / value posts
you can decide now, where you are and how to differ information , entropy , value ....
BTW, the degree of privacy also will differ with that, its correlated. High value info you only get by full known identity
On twetch you must pay some sats, different
think of some sats more and there will be quality / value posts
you can decide now, where you are and how to differ information , entropy , value ....
BTW, the degree of privacy also will differ with that, its correlated. High value info you only get by full known identity
If Twetch proves one thing it's that paying to make posts does NOT improve the quality of its contents.
Re: First beta release of Orange, a blockchain explorer for Bitcoin Core
⭐ Merited by msafi (1)
Have you considered contacting node providers like Nodl, MyNode etc. to include Orange in their software package?
I have seen a video on bitcoin. On that video there was a person who had many bitcoins but at that time bitcoins were not so much used so he hidden those bitcoins in a place and made document about where the bitcoins was. But alas! When bitcoins got market he forgot where he kept those and lost the document. I don't know the exact price but it was more than 1 million.
Can you tell me is it a real or fake?
Can you tell me is it a real or fake?
Can you share a link to that video?
Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper
Craig Wright on the topic of Hodling or rather hoedeling as he pronounces it.
"Hoedeling is probably the most despicable evil thing you can do with bitcoin"
Says the the man who claims to control the bitcoins mined by Satoshi that have never been moved.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1250595473368338432
UPDATE:
CSW appears to have been banned from Twetch
"Hoedeling is probably the most despicable evil thing you can do with bitcoin"
Says the the man who claims to control the bitcoins mined by Satoshi that have never been moved.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1250595473368338432
UPDATE:
CSW appears to have been banned from Twetch
Thanks for this. After a week of being harassed and receiving death threats from BSVers, I could use a good laugh.
Update - important memes:
Whether they are joking or not, casting out CSW as de facto leader of BSV is probably the best PR move they could possibly make.
haha, did ya know he was banned on bct ?
soo much things happened - to Satoshi, to CSW ... nah
I hope soon we see the light
Do you just type random words or are you actually trying to say something here? You make as much sense as your schizophrenic idol.
...
What about the account of Zepher?I just visited the account and his custom Title is still Copper Member...
I think it should be the same as Bruno's Account.
For these users who have died, Rest in Peace.
Edit:
However, I know that these accounts changed hands in the past, and maybe arrangements have been for this to happen again in the future; therefore, if either account ever posts in the future, I will remove this stuff from the account.
I deeply suggest to have those account to be permanently locked.I second this. Zepher definitely deserves the VIP status as well.
Re: Wanted a few Newegg gift cards in exchange for coins or Mtgox
Looking for a few gift card/s fron the Newegg, Looking for $605 total, can split them to $200 x3 or similar amount to make it easier, choose Coins, MtGox or even Paypal in exchange.
Are you aware that Newegg accepts BTC payments directly?
⭐ Merited by suchmoon (7) ,LoyceV (2) ,PrimeNumber7 (1) ,Coolcryptovator (1) ,TheBeardedBaby (1) ,DireWolfM14 (1)
I spoke to Tman today, he's fine. He'll be calling every one of you 'cunts' before you know it.
Re: What Happens When You Write to a Crypto Scammer's Email?
⭐ Merited by nutildah (1)
I sometimes do this too, just for entertainment purposes. I once got invited to open a Turkish bank account so I could receive a large sum of money, I apparently inherited from some dead uncle. I once introduced myself as 'Gofu Kurself', thinking that would be obvious enough for them to know that I wasn't falling for it. They sent me all sort of guides on how to set up the bank account, even sending me some fake legal documents I had to sign. Long story short, they weren't happy when they found out that I was fucking with them.
Re: No one ever sells, nor buys anything in BitCoin.. Think this is wrong, read on!
Many people believe that bitcoin is more precious than gold well i think they are right, but there are also some aspect that the says maybe they are wrong.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, an INFINITE amount of Crypto Currencies can be created, just like Fiat.... There is nothing special about BitCoin, it has no monopoly on the Crypto Currency market. With a million crypto's they can all become worth very little.
Hard Facts
You can't be this dumb, right?
Re: [Plead] Phinnaeus Gage's User Moniker Manifested Due to a Malignant Brain Tumor
Terribly sorry to hear this Bruno. I remember talking to you on several occasions when I first joined Bitcointalk. Will send a donation once you've been online again.
What if BTC never reaches all time high?
Look what happened to Japan stock index Nikkei 225:
https://adjusted-for-inflation.com/japanese-stock-market-nikkei-225/
It peaked in year 1990 at 38800 and only managed to get back to 24800. Now it looks likely it will never reach its all time high anymore.
Now let do a simple comparison:
Nikke 225
All time high 38800.
Second All time high 24800.
Second All time high to All time high ratio: 24800/38800 = 64%
Bitcoin
All time high 20000.
Second All time high 13000
Second All time high to All time high ratio: 13000/20000 = 65%
We can see that their Second All time high to All time high ratio are almost the same.
Is that the same pattern bitcoin will follow? Only pump and dump by whale price manipulators from now on but can only reach All time high again?
Do you own research on the Nikkei 225 index historical patterns and make your conclusion.
(you can view detailed Nikkei 225 index data here: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=TVC%3ANI225)
Look what happened to Japan stock index Nikkei 225:
https://adjusted-for-inflation.com/japanese-stock-market-nikkei-225/
It peaked in year 1990 at 38800 and only managed to get back to 24800. Now it looks likely it will never reach its all time high anymore.
Now let do a simple comparison:
Nikke 225
All time high 38800.
Second All time high 24800.
Second All time high to All time high ratio: 24800/38800 = 64%
Bitcoin
All time high 20000.
Second All time high 13000
Second All time high to All time high ratio: 13000/20000 = 65%
We can see that their Second All time high to All time high ratio are almost the same.
Is that the same pattern bitcoin will follow? Only pump and dump by whale price manipulators from now on but can only reach All time high again?
Do you own research on the Nikkei 225 index historical patterns and make your conclusion.
(you can view detailed Nikkei 225 index data here: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=TVC%3ANI225)
Bitcoin will function exactly how it was designed, regardless of its price. People should stop speculating and learn more about why Bitcoin was designed in the first place.