Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 110 results by TheOnly1
Re: [ANN] [ICO] Gimli - eSports Betting Platform for Streamers - ICO LIVE
Huh, what's the difference between Gimli and UnikoinGold? the only differences I found were that Gimli is NOT open to US residents and UnikoinGold is. Team-wise, UnikoinGold wins with their reputation.
Other than that, what else? They've only raised 5200ETH and it's ending this month. If it was such a great idea, then shouldn't they have sold more?
everything goes on as usual. the market is never empty and time will judge who is stronger and who has more ideas and ways to implement them.Other than that, what else? They've only raised 5200ETH and it's ending this month. If it was such a great idea, then shouldn't they have sold more?
Re: [ANN] [ICO] Gimli - eSports Betting Platform for Streamers - ICO LIVE
I think much money can be earned in the streaming section in the future.
Are you trying to partnership with leading streaming platform like twtich/youtube or will there be another way of interaction between them?
Not sure but have you seen this post: https://medium.com/gimli-project/gimli-partners-with-mock-it-esports-75b935beccf0Are you trying to partnership with leading streaming platform like twtich/youtube or will there be another way of interaction between them?
Gibt es eigenlicht einen Konsens darüber, ob der langfristige Downtrend seit Ende 13/Anfang 14 durchbrochen ist?
Nach dem Post von @curiosity81 ist mir aufgefallen, dass das seit Ende April der Fall sein dürfte.
Ich bekomme leider keinen Chart hier rein, aber Ausgangspunkt war ebenfalls der lineare 1w-chart zu Bitstamp in Bitcoin Wisdom. Setzt man die Linie vom 2. Dez. 13 zum 6. Jan 14 an, wird sie mehrfach tangiert, aber nirgends länger überschritten - außer in diesem Monat.
Nach dem Post von @curiosity81 ist mir aufgefallen, dass das seit Ende April der Fall sein dürfte.
Ich bekomme leider keinen Chart hier rein, aber Ausgangspunkt war ebenfalls der lineare 1w-chart zu Bitstamp in Bitcoin Wisdom. Setzt man die Linie vom 2. Dez. 13 zum 6. Jan 14 an, wird sie mehrfach tangiert, aber nirgends länger überschritten - außer in diesem Monat.
Der Down Trend im linearen Chart wurde in der Tat Ende April durchbrochen.
Denke aber bevor die Linie nicht auch im log Chart durchbrochen wird, ist die Trendumkehr nicht bestätigt. Dürfte so Juli/August soweit sein, wenn so weiter geht wie seit Anfang Jahr.
Die folgende downtrendlinie (am 27.2 bestätigt) ist durchbrochen... jetzt support?
ob das hält?
ob das hält?
Im Wochenchart wurde die Downtrendlinie auch klar durchbrochen. Es lässt sich jetzt keine neue Downtrendilnie mehr finden. So ein Mist, was heißt das jetzt? Liegt der Erwartungswert der Kursentwicklung jetzt bei + Unendlich?
Na gut, in der logarithmischen Ansicht sind wir noch weit von einem Durchbruch entfernt:
hm irgend wie lese ich in letzter zeit immer mehr davon...
bin mal gespannt was die nexten tage so pasiert he he
wünsch euch allen nen frohes fest und nen guten rutsch
nach oben mit den kursen bis ins nexte jahr...
ich bin dann mal arbeiten
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-price-rebounding-strong/
bin mal gespannt was die nexten tage so pasiert he he
wünsch euch allen nen frohes fest und nen guten rutsch
nach oben mit den kursen bis ins nexte jahr...
ich bin dann mal arbeiten
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-price-rebounding-strong/
Ich denke das nächste Jahr wird aufgrund der steigenden Akzeptanz und der Zunahme an internationalen Krisen sehr entscheidend für die Cryptowährungen werden. Insgesamt wird es ein hoch interessantes Jahr für die gesamte Wirtschaft und Finanzwelt werden. Auch wenn die Mehrzahl wie bei der Umfrage von TheOnly1 zu sehen ist, eher pessimistisch ist, denke ich, dass die, die den Bitcoin groß gemacht haben, nach wie vor bullisch sind.
Meiner Meinung nach steigt die Anzahl derjenigen, die eher pessimistisch eingestellt sind, umso mehr der Kurs sinkt, denn viele - vorallem Neulinge - haben bei hören Kursen gekauft, sind jetzt quasi im "Nase-voll-Modus" und haben daher eine pessimistischere Einstellung. Zudem muss man bedenken, dass wir aktuell in der Weihnachtszeit stecken. D.h. Leute die mit BTC spekuliert haben, könnten die Gewinne mitnehmen um damit Geschenke zu kaufen.
Ich erwarte einen schnellen Durchbruch der Bitcoins nur beim Zusammenbruch von Euro oder US$, oder einer starken Verschärfung der Schuldenkriese.
Passiert dies nicht, werden wir vermutlich noch 10 Jahre und mehr warten müssen, bis Bitcoins sich weit verbreiten.
Geduld ist angesagt...
Der russische Rubel ist gerade am zusammenbrechen. Letzte Woche brach auch gleichzeitig der BTC Kurs ein. Ich hätte eigentlich erwartet, dass einige Russen ihre Rubel auch in BTC stecken, nicht nur in Ikea Möbel.
Den Pessimismus in der von mir zitierten Umfrage finde ich postitiv, da nach meiner Meinung der Tiefpunkt erst erreicht ist, wenn die Stimmung im Markt grundsätzlich ins pessimistische gekippt ist. Die vorherigen Umfragen auf Wall Observer waren immer bullish.
http://www.btc-echo.de/wie-bekommen-wir-bitcoin-den-mainstream_2014111001/ jeder guter Ansatz zählt jetzt, Bitcoin muss in den Mainstream um langfristig sich Erfolgreich etablieren zu können, scheinen wohl immer mehr zu begreifen.
Meine Gedanken dazu aus einem anderen Thread:
I am using Bitcoin since couple years and of course i am a big fan.
But I experiencenced some inconveniences in daily use, which I want the community to
know about and I have a proposal how to largely mend this inconveniences:
Even for me, as a person which is familiar with computers since decades, its not always easy to deal with Bitcoin. The
main reason for that is: Bitcoin addresses are not handy.
Dealing with 33 digit public keys and with QR tags is difficult for inexperienced users (think of your sisters, mums and grandparents).
If I have a Bitcoin address or a QR of an address on my phone , how to get it easy to my computer or vice versa? If I got a Bitcoin address on paper (without QR tag) how to make it digital, without tipping a lot? For someone without technical understanding tasks like this are like impossible.
This is my proposal:
Every future new Bitcoin wallet address is connected with a pseudonym. So if I get a new address I choose a name for that wallet, which is conected with that wallet address in the block chain. If my mum wants to send BTC to me, she just puts my choosen name for that wallet in the address field of her Bitcoin client. If I want to send BTC to Amnesty International, I put "Amnesty International" on the address field. Miners should ensure that all pseudonyms are unique, and connect them with the according wallet addresses in the blockchain.
Anonymity is is obtained, nobody has to choose his real name.
Today Bitcoin is like the Internet without name severs, just a lot of numbers and letters nobody can remember. I think my proposal would make Bitcoin much more user friendly and succeed much faster.
I ask the developers to think about my proposal.
By the way, I am not a programmer and I dont know about technical feasibility.
Ich denke damit könnte man Bitcoin ein gutes Stück "Mainstream-Tauglicher" machen.But I experiencenced some inconveniences in daily use, which I want the community to
know about and I have a proposal how to largely mend this inconveniences:
Even for me, as a person which is familiar with computers since decades, its not always easy to deal with Bitcoin. The
main reason for that is: Bitcoin addresses are not handy.
Dealing with 33 digit public keys and with QR tags is difficult for inexperienced users (think of your sisters, mums and grandparents).
If I have a Bitcoin address or a QR of an address on my phone , how to get it easy to my computer or vice versa? If I got a Bitcoin address on paper (without QR tag) how to make it digital, without tipping a lot? For someone without technical understanding tasks like this are like impossible.
This is my proposal:
Every future new Bitcoin wallet address is connected with a pseudonym. So if I get a new address I choose a name for that wallet, which is conected with that wallet address in the block chain. If my mum wants to send BTC to me, she just puts my choosen name for that wallet in the address field of her Bitcoin client. If I want to send BTC to Amnesty International, I put "Amnesty International" on the address field. Miners should ensure that all pseudonyms are unique, and connect them with the according wallet addresses in the blockchain.
Anonymity is is obtained, nobody has to choose his real name.
Today Bitcoin is like the Internet without name severs, just a lot of numbers and letters nobody can remember. I think my proposal would make Bitcoin much more user friendly and succeed much faster.
I ask the developers to think about my proposal.
By the way, I am not a programmer and I dont know about technical feasibility.
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
I noticed that thing like today always happen on sundays. Most likely on early evenings (europe time).
Its strange cause thats the only time in the week no one is at work and all businesses are closed.
Asians are still sleeping and the others enjoy sundays.
So hard to believe for me that a whale (like a bank or similar) causing all this changes in price.
Its strange cause thats the only time in the week no one is at work and all businesses are closed.
Asians are still sleeping and the others enjoy sundays.
So hard to believe for me that a whale (like a bank or similar) causing all this changes in price.
Setting up a Bitcoin address as "your" Bitcoin address or "account" is a very bad idea. You should be using a different Bitcoin address for every single transaction. That is, every time you want someone to send you BTC you should generate a brand new, never been used Bitcoin address for them to use to send you BTC and every time you send someone BTC you should ask for a brand new, never been used address to use to send them BTC.
Rather than go into details I will let you know that someone has just done kind of what you are asking for here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755051.0
I went into a lot more detail in that thread as to why address reuse is a bad idea. All my comments there apply equally well here.
Rather than go into details I will let you know that someone has just done kind of what you are asking for here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755051.0
I went into a lot more detail in that thread as to why address reuse is a bad idea. All my comments there apply equally well here.
Ok, Ive read some of you posts and I pretty much agree. But still my oppinion didnt change. In this case there must be something like an automatism to change the addresses a little bit: I buy at Amazon it shows me a different address (name) all the time: "AmazonBitcoin4678", "AmazonBitcoin4679" and so on. Still possible to remember, possible to write down or to tell it to someone on the phone.
Honestly, I have no idea how to realize this.
But I know, the target must be to enter in Blockchain wallet (or any other wallet) receiver field a name. Without installing additional software and without set up anything.
But I know, the target must be to enter in Blockchain wallet (or any other wallet) receiver field a name. Without installing additional software and without set up anything.
In my imagination the additional code in the blockchain looks just like "1561BfPq4HAp8BpE3rDoojyqCgbo3BTvdb=TheOnly1" 
But I fear it is not that easy...
So you still need an address? What's the point then But I fear it is not that easy...
As I am not a programmer, I think the addresses are still needed for the system. But in my oppinion users should not be confronted with addresses and stuff. Just with theyr choosen wallet names.
So nothing else is needed than a possibility to connect a wallet public key with a name. I dont think this is such a difficult and big change in Bitcoin system...
Get it??