Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 123 results by ThePointlessOne
I will set my bet on Verge saying: "It's an exlorer bug, everything is ok, we just have the most buggy explorer ever;" 
I'll set mine on: "difficulty goes up and down"
Dude just tell me one thing, are you getting payed to trash verge?i mean i understand and respect the fact you dont like verge but you are litereally posting about verge every single hour, we got your point you dont like verge, move on dude you are just being abnoxious and pathetic at this point.
You do realize this thread is specifically for the network attack on verge, and CHIEF56 is researching and posting info related to the attacks or possibly another attack? How is that pathetic? Please go elsewhere if you don't like this thread.
Here's a few blocks that stand out:
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,261
Block hash 63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 2,814.400
Size 9 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:11:58 AM
Historical price $0.03876915 (0.00000526 BTC at $7,377.42)
Total sent 40,661,547.47708500 / $1,565,864.200
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,263
Block hash 3178874e127050ce6e97b31c5e769e4e83443454051d1dcb73a1cd0d9d510c1b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 439,431.806
Size 14 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:14:14 AM
Historical price $0.03865431 (0.00000525 BTC at $7,368.02)
Total sent 3,110,596.07110500 / $119,788.137
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,282
Block hash 42dc1e2328fe537a5075cfb2de896992d7e4900e89ac93a8ff1b29e8b2ff060f
Confirmations 22
Difficulty 1,837.320
Size 1 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:21:31 AM
Historical price $0.03846086 (0.00000522 BTC at $7,367.98)
Total sent 2,995,616.31469100 / $115,360.301
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,261
Block hash 63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 2,814.400
Size 9 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:11:58 AM
Historical price $0.03876915 (0.00000526 BTC at $7,377.42)
Total sent 40,661,547.47708500 / $1,565,864.200
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,263
Block hash 3178874e127050ce6e97b31c5e769e4e83443454051d1dcb73a1cd0d9d510c1b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 439,431.806
Size 14 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:14:14 AM
Historical price $0.03865431 (0.00000525 BTC at $7,368.02)
Total sent 3,110,596.07110500 / $119,788.137
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,282
Block hash 42dc1e2328fe537a5075cfb2de896992d7e4900e89ac93a8ff1b29e8b2ff060f
Confirmations 22
Difficulty 1,837.320
Size 1 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:21:31 AM
Historical price $0.03846086 (0.00000522 BTC at $7,367.98)
Total sent 2,995,616.31469100 / $115,360.301
what exactly stands out? normal difficulty, normal mining reward.. because there was a large amount of transactions?
also, you got the block hashes wrong. 2,224,282 block hash is 42dc1e2328fe537a5075cfb2de896992d7e4900e89ac93a8ff1b29e8b2ff060f
Correct about the hashes due to a copy pasta link issue, but the hashes are correct in the data.
Here's a few blocks that stand out:
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,261
Block hash 63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 2,814.400
Size 9 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:11:58 AM
Historical price $0.03876915 (0.00000526 BTC at $7,377.42)
Total sent 40,661,547.47708500 / $1,565,864.200
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/3178874e127050ce6e97b31c5e769e4e83443454051d1dcb73a1cd0d9d510c1b/
Block 2,224,263
Block hash 3178874e127050ce6e97b31c5e769e4e83443454051d1dcb73a1cd0d9d510c1b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 439,431.806
Size 14 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:14:14 AM
Historical price $0.03865431 (0.00000525 BTC at $7,368.02)
Total sent 3,110,596.07110500 / $119,788.137
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/42dc1e2328fe537a5075cfb2de896992d7e4900e89ac93a8ff1b29e8b2ff060f/
Block 2,224,282
Block hash 42dc1e2328fe537a5075cfb2de896992d7e4900e89ac93a8ff1b29e8b2ff060f
Confirmations 22
Difficulty 1,837.320
Size 1 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:21:31 AM
Historical price $0.03846086 (0.00000522 BTC at $7,367.98)
Total sent 2,995,616.31469100 / $115,360.301
Edit: corrected url issue pointed out below.
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b/
Block 2,224,261
Block hash 63fe4741438ea096c981491ad43f25e123f79fc6b9cdd8120a615c9fa05b020b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 2,814.400
Size 9 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:11:58 AM
Historical price $0.03876915 (0.00000526 BTC at $7,377.42)
Total sent 40,661,547.47708500 / $1,565,864.200
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/3178874e127050ce6e97b31c5e769e4e83443454051d1dcb73a1cd0d9d510c1b/
Block 2,224,263
Block hash 3178874e127050ce6e97b31c5e769e4e83443454051d1dcb73a1cd0d9d510c1b
Confirmations 39
Difficulty 439,431.806
Size 14 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:14:14 AM
Historical price $0.03865431 (0.00000525 BTC at $7,368.02)
Total sent 3,110,596.07110500 / $119,788.137
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Verge/42dc1e2328fe537a5075cfb2de896992d7e4900e89ac93a8ff1b29e8b2ff060f/
Block 2,224,282
Block hash 42dc1e2328fe537a5075cfb2de896992d7e4900e89ac93a8ff1b29e8b2ff060f
Confirmations 22
Difficulty 1,837.320
Size 1 kB
Timestamp Tuesday, May 29, 2018 10:21:31 AM
Historical price $0.03846086 (0.00000522 BTC at $7,367.98)
Total sent 2,995,616.31469100 / $115,360.301
Edit: corrected url issue pointed out below.
There's definitely a difference between a need and a want. Most domain names can be slightly modified and still be extremely relevant to their use. .NET and .ORG are lower tier anyway. Good luck.
You're asking this?!
minegold.net: $1,122,995.00
minegold.org: $1,122,995.00
While I can get a .COM name for this?
minegold.com: $3,528
Holy cow! Good luck. You're going to need it.
No am not expecting anywhere near that that. I post them here for offers. You are the one needing luck, having no common sense!
If you're not expecting anywhere near that then why have it listed at that price? Potential buyers are going to see that then run the opposite direction.
GoldWallet.org + MineGold.net + MineGold.org - are good domains!
You might want to also list them on Sedo.com
Good luck with sales mate!
I have them listed where I want them.You might want to also list them on Sedo.com
Good luck with sales mate!
All these domains are great. People just need some foresight. Gold will be money again. One just needs to look how much gold russia/china/east is buying to see the writing on the wall!
minegold.net, minegold.org could be best possible domains for pooling gold-backed mining rigs all around the world.
You're asking this?!
minegold.net: $1,122,995.00
minegold.org: $1,122,995.00
While I can get a .COM name for this?
minegold.com: $3,528
Holy cow! Good luck. You're going to need it.
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
What was ION's sat price during the ICO? What is it today?
Your inflated USD numbers are directly related to BTC's price increase, not because of anything ION has done. Don't mislead the sheep.
Your inflated USD numbers are directly related to BTC's price increase, not because of anything ION has done. Don't mislead the sheep.
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
ion down to $1 at this rate be half its value soon bad for those that bought at $1.61. time to quote performance in satoshi or is usd still the exchange metric to compare?
Sadly it's going down in satoshi too... was 50k at the start of the powergridstormthingy, now barely 30k. Who knew that empty promises don't always get you to the moon.
Empty promises
.......... the only thing that's empty are your words Nothing empty about....
Ahhh yes. The power of PNGs. Where have I seen this saga before?
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Wow. DodgerKorvas is still here deflecting legitimate questions? Not surprising. Perhaps one day he/she will stop deflecting with attacks and actually answer questions.
Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)
From Reformer:
http://www.reformer.com/stories/garza-pleads-guilty-to-wire-fraud,514230
http://www.reformer.com/stories/garza-pleads-guilty-to-wire-fraud,514230
Quote
The loss attributed to the scheme was $9,182,000, according to the press release. Garza faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 12.
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
I still don't understand why the devs created this thread but never post here. WTF kind of reasoning is that? Slack is terrible and erases the post history after a while which is why they prolly use it.
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Reading through Slack:
"so markets look good. an absolute bloodbath out there today in alt work and yet ion is 20% up"
LOL. No wallet but they insist ION is BOOMING. You can't make this shit up.
"so markets look good. an absolute bloodbath out there today in alt work and yet ion is 20% up"
LOL. No wallet but they insist ION is BOOMING. You can't make this shit up.
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
ION has incompetent devs. There was already a rebase. Now there is going to be a rollback. Rollbacks should NEVER happen. This destroys the integrity of coins, not that ION has much as it is.
If there is a similar issue in the future, are they just going to implement another rollback? What about the people that cashed out into BTC during that time? With the rollback, they'll get to keep their BTC and potentially get back the IONs they sold.
The devs are screwing up bigly, and the majority of the ionite shills in Slack were telling people to shutup and enjoy the free coins when the issue occurred rather than trying to figure out what was causing it. If you didn't see that as a legit problem then you're the actual problem. It's repulsive.
If there is a similar issue in the future, are they just going to implement another rollback? What about the people that cashed out into BTC during that time? With the rollback, they'll get to keep their BTC and potentially get back the IONs they sold.
The devs are screwing up bigly, and the majority of the ionite shills in Slack were telling people to shutup and enjoy the free coins when the issue occurred rather than trying to figure out what was causing it. If you didn't see that as a legit problem then you're the actual problem. It's repulsive.
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Hi,
Bittrex is still showing this message for this coin : "Wallet Offline at dev request"
It's been days now, should i start to worry?
Bittrex is still showing this message for this coin : "Wallet Offline at dev request"
It's been days now, should i start to worry?
No need to worry but if you are concerned go to slack, ask and discuss
As a long time investor in Ionomy I'm not concerned, I'm just waiting for the new wallet to be released so ION can continue travelling again on the road of growth.
What's the point in going to ask questions in Slack if the devs just ignore it? You are one ignorant shill.
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
Why don't you ask and report back. This "go ask on slack" meme is getting old. Nobody's saying shit there:
@suchmoon You could always ask the team on Ionomy Slack "what the details of this defect are from a "unbiased" source?" Is it a bug or an attack
or the team setting the stage for a big pump or scheduled upgrade of the wallet that has been moved forward I have confidence in Huey that the team will get a handle on this defect and implement a solution ASAP when all the facts are in...Huey has implemented a News Blackout and the team will release information about when the defect is announced...
Then why would you tell people to go ask in Slack if this is the case?