Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 41 results by The_Immortal
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.5 (Linux / Windows)
dstm, what to do if overall process is not shown (pic)?
I've tried to relaunch the miner and reboot the system - the same.
I've tried to relaunch the miner and reboot the system - the same.
Guys... Please... How to fix it?
What does it mean?
Intesity is on the minimum - 8.
No OC at all (stock settings)!
Also I get Quote
result for nonce 27c0a4ae does not validate on CPU!
What does it mean?
Intesity is on the minimum - 8.
No OC at all (stock settings)!
Quote
an illegal memory access was encountered cryptonight_extra_cpu_final line 235
Any ideas guys? Please....
Guys... Please... How to fix it?
What does it mean?
Intesity is on the minimum - 8.
No OC at all (stock settings)!
Quote
result for nonce 27c0a4ae does not validate on CPU!
What does it mean?
Intesity is on the minimum - 8.
No OC at all (stock settings)!
Re: [Awesome Miner]- Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 5000 miners
patrike, can you please add dstm miner for Equihash? It's the very promising miner coz it has more performance againts other Equihash miners.
The second thing. Can you please add Telegram support for notifications?
And the third thing. How to get information from Awesome Miner Remote Agent? Nothing said about it on the help page.
Thank you!
From what I can see, that mining software doesn't provide any API, so there is nothing Awesome Miner can display about the mining for it.The second thing. Can you please add Telegram support for notifications?
And the third thing. How to get information from Awesome Miner Remote Agent? Nothing said about it on the help page.
Thank you!
And can you please answer on this:
How to get information from Awesome Miner Remote Agent? Nothing said about it on the help page.
Thank you!
replace march=native by march=core2 in configure.sh then use ./build.sh
Finally, it works now!Thank you very much!
Did you use
Nope. As I said before all I made is Code:
-march=native
3. I edited Makefile.am:
Code:
...
#ccminer_CPPFLAGS += -DUSE_LIBSODIUM
#ccminer_LDFLAGS += -Lequi/lib
#ccminer_LDADD += -lsodium
ccminer_LDADD += -lcuda
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_61,code=\"sm_61,compute_61\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\"
nvcc_FLAGS = $(nvcc_ARCH) @CUDA_INCLUDES@ -I. @CUDA_CFLAGS@
nvcc_FLAGS += $(JANSSON_INCLUDES) --ptxas-options="-v"
...
#ccminer_CPPFLAGS += -DUSE_LIBSODIUM
#ccminer_LDFLAGS += -Lequi/lib
#ccminer_LDADD += -lsodium
ccminer_LDADD += -lcuda
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_61,code=\"sm_61,compute_61\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\"
nvcc_FLAGS = $(nvcc_ARCH) @CUDA_INCLUDES@ -I. @CUDA_CFLAGS@
nvcc_FLAGS += $(JANSSON_INCLUDES) --ptxas-options="-v"
...
Should I put
Code:
-march=native
into Makefile.am as well?Guys... Could you help me please?... What did I make wrong?
1. I installed on my Ubuntu CUDA 9.0.176.
2. I downloaded the source from the following link (ccminer-cuda-9).
3. I edited Makefile.am:
4. I compiled ccminer. And here is strange thing - I got ccminer with the size about 18 MB. But last time (when i used CUDA 7.5) I got it with 34-35 MB... Myabe is it because of my Makefile.am? Ok, screw it, right?
5. ccminer --version showed everything is OK.
Now I copied just compiled ccminer and lib directory (with 3 files into it: libcudart.so.9.0 + libcudart.so.9.0 + libcudart.so.9.0.176) to other PC (/home/user/ccminer/) without installed CUDA on it.
I did:
Why?
I've compiled ccminer on PC with Intel CPU. And I copied it toPC with AMD CPU. But before you've said that CPU doesn't matter, doesn't it?
1. I installed on my Ubuntu CUDA 9.0.176.
2. I downloaded the source from the following link (ccminer-cuda-9).
3. I edited Makefile.am:
Code:
...
#ccminer_CPPFLAGS += -DUSE_LIBSODIUM
#ccminer_LDFLAGS += -Lequi/lib
#ccminer_LDADD += -lsodium
ccminer_LDADD += -lcuda
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_61,code=\"sm_61,compute_61\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\"
nvcc_FLAGS = $(nvcc_ARCH) @CUDA_INCLUDES@ -I. @CUDA_CFLAGS@
nvcc_FLAGS += $(JANSSON_INCLUDES) --ptxas-options="-v"
...
#ccminer_CPPFLAGS += -DUSE_LIBSODIUM
#ccminer_LDFLAGS += -Lequi/lib
#ccminer_LDADD += -lsodium
ccminer_LDADD += -lcuda
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_61,code=\"sm_61,compute_61\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\"
nvcc_FLAGS = $(nvcc_ARCH) @CUDA_INCLUDES@ -I. @CUDA_CFLAGS@
nvcc_FLAGS += $(JANSSON_INCLUDES) --ptxas-options="-v"
...
4. I compiled ccminer. And here is strange thing - I got ccminer with the size about 18 MB. But last time (when i used CUDA 7.5) I got it with 34-35 MB... Myabe is it because of my Makefile.am? Ok, screw it, right?
5. ccminer --version showed everything is OK.
Now I copied just compiled ccminer and lib directory (with 3 files into it: libcudart.so.9.0 + libcudart.so.9.0 + libcudart.so.9.0.176) to other PC (/home/user/ccminer/) without installed CUDA on it.
I did:
Code:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/home/user/ccminer/lib
And then:Code:
/home/user/ccminer/ccminer --version
Illegal instruction
Illegal instruction
Why?
I've compiled ccminer on PC with Intel CPU. And I copied it toPC with AMD CPU. But before you've said that CPU doesn't matter, doesn't it?
pallas,
cpu doesn't matter, unless you compiled with cpu specific flags.
is the software the same on the two machines? same OS, same version? same packages installed?
I had no problems sharing ccminer binaries with other people using the same linux OS, it even worked with different distributions, provided it had the same shared libraries available.
Exactly - all the same: OS, miner software, etc.
But could you tell me please if I want to compile ccminer for GTX 1050 only regardless any CPU what should I do?
As I get all I need is add into Makefile.am the following flag:
Correct?
scryptr, Of course I use it... Every time, again and again (for every another PC) i use this file to compile ccminer by default. Or what did you mean by that?
And... Could you please explain how is it possible... There two absolutely identical PC: motherboards, CPU, the same GPUs (1050) from the same vendor. I compile ccminer on one of them and expect that it will work on both PC (make sense?) Nope! It works only on PC it was built on! Why is that?? (btw, it was tested on cryptonight algo).
I think it's not about GPUs architecture. It's about CPU architecture. ccminer is too sensetive to all hardware during its compiling... How to say ccminer to be not so sensetive to get more universal solution?
Thank you!
P.S. But under windows it works perfectly. You don't need to break your brain - you just need to download ready binaries and launch it...... It's a dream for Ubuntu
P.P.S. BTW, what switch should I use for GTX 1050? Never found it in the list.
JUST USE BUILD.SH
Of course I use it... Every time, again and again (for every another PC) i use this file to compile ccminer by default. Or what did you mean by that? I never found this intimidating or difficult.
Well, that's not too hard indeed. But when you've to download nvidia-toolkit (2.5GB) and then compile ccminer (from 5-15 mins) ten times in a row - that's a lil bit frustrating! Do you get me? Further, if you have all Pascal GPUs, you can set switches within the code to build a binary specific for Pascal architecture.
Yup, all my GPUs are Pascal (GTX 1050). But can you gimme please an example how to use switches for Pascal GPUs? Or did you mean maybe flags not switches? Well, those flags won't help - I tell you (see below why).And... Could you please explain how is it possible... There two absolutely identical PC: motherboards, CPU, the same GPUs (1050) from the same vendor. I compile ccminer on one of them and expect that it will work on both PC (make sense?) Nope! It works only on PC it was built on! Why is that?? (btw, it was tested on cryptonight algo).
I think it's not about GPUs architecture. It's about CPU architecture. ccminer is too sensetive to all hardware during its compiling... How to say ccminer to be not so sensetive to get more universal solution?
Thank you!
P.S. But under windows it works perfectly. You don't need to break your brain - you just need to download ready binaries and launch it...... It's a dream for Ubuntu
P.P.S. BTW, what switch should I use for GTX 1050? Never found it in the list.
cpu doesn't matter, unless you compiled with cpu specific flags.
is the software the same on the two machines? same OS, same version? same packages installed?
I had no problems sharing ccminer binaries with other people using the same linux OS, it even worked with different distributions, provided it had the same shared libraries available.
But could you tell me please if I want to compile ccminer for GTX 1050 only regardless any CPU what should I do?
As I get all I need is add into Makefile.am the following flag:
Code:
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_60,code="sm_60,compute_60"
and remove all other flags concerning nvcc_ARCH.Correct?
scryptr, Of course I use it... Every time, again and again (for every another PC) i use this file to compile ccminer by default. Or what did you mean by that?
And... Could you please explain how is it possible... There two absolutely identical PC: motherboards, CPU, the same GPUs (1050) from the same vendor. I compile ccminer on one of them and expect that it will work on both PC (make sense?) Nope! It works only on PC it was built on! Why is that?? (btw, it was tested on cryptonight algo).
I think it's not about GPUs architecture. It's about CPU architecture. ccminer is too sensetive to all hardware during its compiling... How to say ccminer to be not so sensetive to get more universal solution?
Thank you!
P.S. But under windows it works perfectly. You don't need to break your brain - you just need to download ready binaries and launch it...... It's a dream for Ubuntu
P.P.S. BTW, what switch should I use for GTX 1050? Never found it in the list.
JUST USE BUILD.SH
Of course I use it... Every time, again and again (for every another PC) i use this file to compile ccminer by default. Or what did you mean by that? I never found this intimidating or difficult.
Well, that's not too hard indeed. But when you've to download nvidia-toolkit (2.5GB) and then compile ccminer (from 5-15 mins) ten times in a row - that's a lil bit frustrating! Do you get me? Further, if you have all Pascal GPUs, you can set switches within the code to build a binary specific for Pascal architecture.
Yup, all my GPUs are Pascal (GTX 1050). But can you gimme please an example how to use switches for Pascal GPUs? Or did you mean maybe flags not switches? Well, those flags won't help - I tell you (see below why).And... Could you please explain how is it possible... There two absolutely identical PC: motherboards, CPU, the same GPUs (1050) from the same vendor. I compile ccminer on one of them and expect that it will work on both PC (make sense?) Nope! It works only on PC it was built on! Why is that?? (btw, it was tested on cryptonight algo).
I think it's not about GPUs architecture. It's about CPU architecture. ccminer is too sensetive to all hardware during its compiling... How to say ccminer to be not so sensetive to get more universal solution?
Thank you!
P.S. But under windows it works perfectly. You don't need to break your brain - you just need to download ready binaries and launch it...... It's a dream for Ubuntu
P.P.S. BTW, what switch should I use for GTX 1050? Never found it in the list.
scryptr, thank you.
Maybe you can help with another question. Is there a way TO NOT COMPILE CCMINER FOR EVERY PC?!?!
I have several rigs (they are on Ubuntu). I've compiled ccminer for one of them and it's worked. Then I switched ready ccminer to the same hardware configuration (socket, CPU, videocards) and... CCminer just exited after its launching.. So I had to compile it AGAIN... and it worked.
OMG... Should I compile this hell under every PC?....
Thank you!
Maybe you can help with another question. Is there a way TO NOT COMPILE CCMINER FOR EVERY PC?!?!
I have several rigs (they are on Ubuntu). I've compiled ccminer for one of them and it's worked. Then I switched ready ccminer to the same hardware configuration (socket, CPU, videocards) and... CCminer just exited after its launching.. So I had to compile it AGAIN... and it worked.
OMG... Should I compile this hell under every PC?....
Thank you!
Well, I'm trying cryptonight via recent 2.2.2 ccminer (GTX 1050). On Windows it works well. But under Ubuntu it just closed without any error.
Could you tell me please how to solve the problem? Thank you!
Could you tell me please how to solve the problem? Thank you!
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.3 (Linux / Windows)
Any plan to support equihash-192,7? (ZER)
I had some request to support different equihash variants. Currently I'm focusing on requests and general improvements (for 200,9) - so not sure about it.
Re: [Awesome Miner]- Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 5000 miners
patrike, can you please add dstm miner for Equihash? It's the very promising miner coz it has more performance againts other Equihash miners.
The second thing. Can you please add Telegram support for notifications?
And the third thing. How to get information from Awesome Miner Remote Agent? Nothing said about it on the help page.
Thank you!
The second thing. Can you please add Telegram support for notifications?
And the third thing. How to get information from Awesome Miner Remote Agent? Nothing said about it on the help page.
Thank you!
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.3 (Linux / Windows)
induktor ,
That's what i read about in the forums but then again when i tested it, if i put --fee 0 it lowers the hashrate like 1% can disable de fee --fee 0 but it will mine a bit slower.
Nope, you're wrong. Even with no fee option EWBF miner will work on the same rate odd..... anyway the guy's gotta eat, so 1% sounds fair enough 4 me 
but it is strange since EWBF himself said that there is no penalty for putting --fee 0, so, dunno
Anyway, let's stop it coz we are going to offtopic